Texe Marrs: Serpent is Symbol of Jewish Satanism
August 2, 2016
Direct Link to Latest News
August 2, 2016
Peter said (August 3, 2016):
The Talmud is no the Torah.
Jesus identifies evil Jews and names them as the Synagogue of Satan - you make the same mistake everyone does who attacks this evil by not supporting the narrative with the Bible. If you are going to state the true character of Judaism is the Talmud then what is the religion the Jews follow who believe the Torah?
What is the pre-conversion religion of say Jerry Golden who is a Messianic Jew who believes in Christ? The enemy has stolen the Dictionary....
Peace (and you and I Henry, know there will not only be no peace but that we are heading for WW III )
--
Peter
It doesn't matter because the leadership doesn't.
h
Marcos said (August 3, 2016):
The first and most important prophecy in the Bible was told by God against the Serpent, in judgement for his deceiving of Eve. Genesis 3:15.
Your will bruise the heel of the offspring of the woman, but He will crush your head.
Jesus is the offspring of Eve. Satan and the Jewish leaders (whom Jesus called sons -offspring- of Satan) indeed bruised His heel when they crucified Him, but in doing so, crushed their own head unawares, because in that moment Satan lost the power over saved human beings and the Jews lost their temporal power on religion. What a flop.
It was a crushing defeat indeed, and Satan's main objective today is to keep people ignorant of this fact, so they don't seek salvation through the cross. The whole worship of the serpent thing is only an effort to deny this defeat.
Vikram said (August 3, 2016):
The Jew is an enigma. Who/what is a Jew? As E. Michael Jones points out in his 'The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its impact on World History', the Gospel of John 20:19 depicts the apostles locked in a room on the day of Christ's resurrection. They had locked the doors says John, "for fear of the Jews". But John was a Jew as were the other apostles, so the statement makes no sense, unless you understand that already, at this very early stage of Christianity, the term 'Jew' had taken on a very specific connotation, that is, a rejector of Christ. No longer is a Hebrew defined by his DNA, but by acceptance or rejection of the Messiah - the ones that accepted Christ were the first Christians, while the ones that refused to accept Him are called 'Jews'.
The fact that these rejectors of Christ have (in the main) seemingly also rejected the Torah, which is the roadmap that leads to Christ, and instead chosen to be beguiled and seduced by the Serpent's promises is confirmation that they have rejected the God of the Torah for the god of the Underworld. It is a predisposition that goes back to Moses' day and the golden calf.
But note that these rejectors of Christ are only a portion of the Hebrew people. Hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of the Hebrew people have accepted Christ, among them the very first Christians. My hope is that many thousands more will trample on the Serpent's head and take up Christ - their Saviour and the Saviour of the whole world, intended for them by God from the time of Adam's fall.
Sid Green said (August 3, 2016):
It's the Gaon of Vilna (Genius of Vilna)
not the Vilna Gaon. That's like saying the Makow of Henry
I have read that Rabbi's vile Babylonian serpantine doctrine I own Rabbi Bakst's book. Texe Marrs seems OK, be careful of errors. We wouldn't want to discredit our highly valid criticism of the home faith now would we.
like the article
Al Thompson is an imbecile.
Biblical prophecy is going to come to pass and this earth will be singed to a crisp. Have a nice day
Al Thompson said (August 2, 2016):
Why should anyone believe in the Bible? It was written by Jews and Jesus Christ was a Jew according to the writing. After studying the Jewish issue, why should anyone believe anything a religious "leader" says. Many of them are liars, hypocrites, fags, child molesters, and just general perverts. And these kinds of people are found in most religions. I don't have any respect for any of them any longer. In the Bible, Jesus and Lucifer are both identified as the "bright morning star." What's up with that?
Most of the churches are lead by sick and demented teachers with no moral standards.
The problem with writings is that little can be proven as fact. And unless faith is rooted in some facts, then it doesn't have any value. That's my opinion based on experience. The only facts religious teachers can point to are their writings, but writings don't always reflect the facts; they may or may not be true. Then what?
http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-moral-order-of-natural-law.html
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at
Imran said (August 3, 2016):
These particular Jews in that article appear to be popular. Although it seems that they are technically Satanists.
However, I would think that a number of global elite members would have a Luciferian religion with worship of Satan in one form or another, but which is almost exclusively restricted to them only and not the masses.