Is Assisted Suicide Part of NWO Agenda?
June 4, 2016
Direct Link to Latest News
June 4, 2016
Elaine said (June 5, 2016):
Of course it is. Anything that has anything to do with darkness and death is on their agenda. So many people are as ignorant as a barrel of bricks, they won't see anything wrong with it. There's plenty wrong with it, but I don't expect the average Canadian to know enough to figure it out. If it makes Canadians feel any better, Americans are in the same boat heading in the same direction and won't know anymore than the average Canadian. I know the powers that be are already doing such things in the U.S.
LM said (June 5, 2016):
This is just a diversion away from a real killer of people by our supposed medical saints. I am talking about iarogenic deaths. Deaths of patients by "mistakes" of doctors and nurses.
We are talking hundreds of thousands of people a year. We are talking millions of people significantly injured a year.
The last place I want to be, given the staggering amount of mistakes, honest, careless or deliberate, is a hospital.
Chet said (June 4, 2016):
I think the Assisted Suicide laws are a very bad idea b/c, at least in the States, they involve the medical profession, thus subverting their mission of saving lives. To trust the NWO State with decisions expediting deaths is naive beyond belief. Because as all readers of this column should know by now is that They Want You Dead.
I had the good fortune to meet Dr. Paul Byrne a few years ago. He is a very respected retired pediatrician who patented a life-saving device for infants. He is carrying a lonely battle to say that the "brain death" term is indispensable to the organ donor industry. Once a person is truly dead, his vital organs (as opposed to corneas) are worthless. In fact, these organs are harvested from still living persons. Too much to explain in this venue, but please check out his website: truthaboutorgandonation.com.
Also, it saves hospitals from lots of expensive treatment that would no longer be deemed necessary.
Most people who want these laws do so out of fear of suffering "needlessly." Inform your relatives you do not want to be a donor and not to consent on your behalf out of misplaced compassion.
James C said (June 4, 2016):
Assisted suicide is a Talmudic principle being sanctioned by the state.
As Elizabeth Dilling documented in her book The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today ([Torrance, CA: The Noontide Press, 1983], p. 25):
Is Assisted Suicide Part of NWO Agenda?
Elaborate pains were taken, rather recently, by Rabbis to deny that "mercy" killings are
permitted in Judaism — because they are. The public discussion was on whether or not a
hopelessly sick person should be put out of his misery. The Rabbis denied that would be proper,
necessarily knowing that the Talmud states otherwise. The Talmud, Sanhedrin 77b-78a, contains
these rabbinical edicts:
"Both agree that if he killed a Terefah [explained in a footnote as 'a person suffering from
some fatal organic disease, recovery from which is impossible'] — he is exempt." And: "If one
kills a Terefah, he is exempt; whilst if a Terefah committed murder: if in the presence of a Beth
Din [i.e. a Talmudic law court] he is liable; otherwise he is exempt."
Tony B said (June 4, 2016):
Henry, it may be coincidence; then too . . .
I have just been reading (Catholic) writings concerning horrible suffering of some people. It was pointed out that many saints became saints through just such suffering. It often makes one realize that God is important, nothing else. The gist of the writings is that people who have no sort of suffering in their lives are much more prone to pride, self love and lack of attention to the demands of God than those who have any sort of physical impediment. In other words, suffering, no matter how terrible, can be the best thing that ever happened to some people as it may be the difference for them of an eternity in heaven or in hell. How does premature death contribute anything to that? It does the opposite, giving the devil more souls which could have been saved from him.
Of course, you have to believe in heaven and hell to see the advantage here. Still, it really doesn't take much mental application if one truly wants to know.
AH said (June 4, 2016):
Hi Henry - I was living in the Northern Territory, Australia, when this became an issue. Former chief minister, Marshall Peron, tried to legalize it back then, due to the fact that he had watched his elderly mother die of a terminal disease. There is no doubt that this affected him, as it would any decent human being.
Arguments offered against euthanasia came thick and fast - some from the religious community, based on their various doctrines or social policies. One of the best arguments put forward at the time came from Europe, where Holland had legalized euthanasia of the ageing and terminally ill some time before.
Some 27,000 people had died under their new law, and most of them were found to have been terminated with a doctor and family members signing their lives away on court documents - many of them, so that "family" could get their hands on the family inheritance. There were no real safeguards in place and palliative care didn't even rate a mention.
For me, it's like the death penalty imposed in various countries for heinous crimes. At first it looks good, sounds like a deterrent, but then along comes a bevy of corrupt officials and politicians who use it as a mechanism for payback and getting rid of rivals through apparently legitimate means.
In short, it's too risky at the best of times, to allow medicos and greedy family members to play God with people's lives...
Al Thompson said (June 4, 2016):
The main problem with assisted suicide is that any way I look at it, the act is murder which is forbidden by the commandments. The idea of man playing God in life and death decisions is evil and it is of the devil.
I think the NWO freaks like to focus on death rather than help people live happy lives. Assisted suicide or euthanasia crosses the line and violates God's commandments. That's really the only way to make a decision. Euthanasia is murder. It opens the door to even more evil and puts the state in the power of God. Assisted suicide is not a good idea.
http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2015/09/on-assisted-suicide.html
Dan A said (June 4, 2016):
I believe in physician assisted suicide. I believe that medical technology in various forms keeps people alive who really should be dead. So people should have the right to end their suffering based on their personal choice. In other words, if someone wants to die I think they should have the right to die assisted by health care providers in some way. People commit suicide primarily to end their pain, physically or intrinsically. So if someone wants to end their life I believe the medical community should assist them in some way.
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at
VR said (June 5, 2016):
I am in favor of assisted suicide, in fact that is what I want when I have had enough -
but I will not necessarily need the 'assisted' part if they just allow me to get the drugs
without arguing with me - I consider it my decision and no-one else's business !!!!
I get the "Exit International" newsletter so I keep up with what works, and it seems that the most simple way is either nitrogen tenting or the animal euthanasia drug.
There are many people out there involved in this, so I am hopeful common sense will prevail and it may be a simple thing when I get to that point in time, maybe in 10 years
as I am now 76 !
I just wanted to express the seriousness of this conversation & how just thinking about lying around in a bed in discomfort for months on end, makes me ready to get off the planet NOW !
Life is sweet, but we have to go and I would rather go when I choose, than let some other
human make the decision to keep me 'alive' for no practical reason.
I bet you get a lot of emails to that effect !