Direct Link to Latest News

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text | ShareThis icon Facebook icon Twitter icon Email icon
 

Pope Preached Everything But Christ

September 30, 2015

popeF.jpeg
Pope Promotes Freemason Secular Salvation



Where did he say, "You have set aside the teachings 
of Jesus Christ and he is now treated as a disgraced 
relative while hedonism and lasciviousness is championed? 
I cannot praise you as a moral nation. I cannot say God Bless America. 
I rebuke you as a wayward child. Repent." 



by Kieran Dunn
(henrymakow.co,) 

I'm Disappointed.

Pope Francis had the world's attention as he addressed a joint session of Congress.

He focused upon the most pressing secular issues of the day: climate change, immigration, poverty, the death penalty, the refugee crisis in Europe, and global arms trade.

He made veiled and brief remarks about abortion and the family, but as the Vicar of Christ, he did not present Christ as the antidote for sin, which is what ails mankind.

He mentioned Moses and Abraham Lincoln, but no mention of Jesus.

That is why I am disappointed.

Millions of evangelicals and traditional Catholics were disappointed.

The mainstream media hails him as the People's Pope, which by extension means he speaks for Christianity. Pope Francis does not speak for the Protestants, nor the Eastern Orthodox and Coptic Churches which are as old as Catholicism.

The Apostle Peter, considered the first Pope of Catholicism, wrote: But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect. [I Peter 3:15].

Pope Francis did speak of the brotherhood of man-but where was Christ presented?

Granted Pope Francis's very presence speaks of Christ, but what did listeners take away with them?

Where was the message that Jesus spoke-"the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the Gospel."

Where was the message that America's embrace of secularism has replaced the eternal with the temporal-the spiritual with the carnal?

Where did he say "You have set aside the teachings of Jesus Christ and he is now treated as a disgraced relative while hedonism and lasciviousness is championed? I cannot praise you as a moral nation. I cannot say God Bless America. I rebuke you as a wayward child. Repent." 

He needed to remind the nation that "by embracing everything and offending no one, nothing is defined as sacred, no code of conduct is endorsed, and there is no hope for the future. Mark my words, you will be overtaken by evil."

SECULAR HEAVEN

Many centuries ago St. Augustine wrote about the City of God and the city of man. It is a simple concept in that one city is earthly and other heavenly.

One city continues forever while the other ends in judgment.

The city of God is ruled by God himself, while the other city is of human construction.

The late Charles Colson wrote in his book "Kingdoms in Conflict," the Kingdom of God and the kingdom of this world are headed in opposite directions toward different destinations.

For example the U.S. Supreme Court just this year ruled that same-sex couples can marry nationwide, establishing a new civil right.

Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis flatly refused to issue marriage licenses anyone and subsequently defied a court order to issue marriage licenses. Davis said she was acting "under God's authority."  She petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for an emergency stay which was rejected (they don't acknowledge God's authority).

In response to the court's refusal to grant her stay request, Davis stated: I never imagined a day like this would come, where I would be asked to violate a central teaching of Scripture and of Jesus Himself regarding marriage.  To issue a marriage license which conflicts with God's definition of marriage, with my name affixed to the certificate, would violate my conscience.

Kingdoms in conflict.

A survey of American adults conducted by YouGov found that 56% supported the decision to jail Davis, while 65% said she should resign from office.

CHRISTIANS IN CONFLICT

We need to realize like the patriarch Abraham that "we are strangers and pilgrims on the earth and desire a better country, that is, a heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called our God: for he has prepared for us a city (Hebrews 11:13-16)."

This is not to suggest Christians surrender and give up-on the contrary Jesus said plainly--"You are the light of the world.  A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid...Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven" [Matthew 5:14-16].

Therefore, Christians must decide at what point enough is enough! If Christians as a group are not willing to stand for righteousness and live as Christ, then in actually they are practicing atheists- and deny the faith. Think about it! 

  ------
Related- Pope Met Kim Davis 
Did Pope Francis Really Say Jesus Was a Failure?
Pat Buchanan- Pope's World Vs Real World 
First Comment from Marco A:
That was a really nice article that I feel hit many good points. I also noticed that the Pope never mentioned the name of Jesus in the speech I read, which is a shame.

There is power in that name, and people really need spirituality in their lives. Talking about social politics never brings anyone to God. I don't need someone talking to me about the environment, or being hospitable to my fellow man, show me the way to God and those things will come naturally, God is what I need and desire above all.

John the Baptist said when Jesus began His ministry, "I must diminish, so he can increase." But with the media turning this Pope into a celebrity we are essentially witnessing the opposite, all you hear is Francis, but no Jesus.

I can watch 5 minute YouTube videos of Tim Tebow or Manny Pacquiao and come to a better understanding of God than through all these speeches of the Pope, which is sad.

Wasn't there a Masonic plan to create a new religion concerned with the worship of man, and sanctified by man? I think we are already there with people worshiping 'great men' like scientists and what not, and maybe its a harsh stretch, but with all this man praising, and pleasing, it seems like we are heading in that direction even more.

David S adds:
What's worse than his political message to congress, except for the possible impact upon Speaker Boehner to resign, was his homily at Saint Patrick's Cathedral where he said: "And if at times our efforts and works seem to fail and not produce fruit, we need to remember that we are followers of Jesus Christ and his life, humanly speaking, ended in failure, the failure of the cross."
Such a statement is contrary to the the words of Jesus and the New Testament message.  But that is understandable in light of the fact that there is no such thing as a "Pope" in Christian teaching.  Peter was not the first pope because there is no evidence that he was except for catholic dogma, and the cryptic new testament section citing Jesus giving the keys of the kingdom to Peter doesn't help catholic apologetics on this point.  Neither is the Roman Catholic Church the true or only church.  There's as much chance of that as of The Church of Latter Day Saints or the Jehovah's Witnesses have of being the true church.  The papacy is an office in the Catholic Church, nothing more.  



Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Pope Preached Everything But Christ"

Gail said (October 1, 2015):

The Pope means father right? Let’s see what Jesus has to say about that:

Matthew 23 - http://biblehub.com/matthew/23.htm

“And do not call anyone on earth 'father,' for you have one Father, and he is in heaven.”

Is the Pope our Leader? Let’s see what Jesus has to say:

"Do not be called leaders; for I am your only leader.”


I would say that the reason why the Pope doesn’t mention Jesus is because he is a liar and Jesus was about Truth:

1 John 2:22

Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son.

John 4:3 King James Version (KJV)

“And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.”

Is the Pope a liar, he is worse than that. Great article on the Present day Pope from Global Research.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/washingtons-pope-who-is-francis-i-cardinal-jorge-mario-bergoglio-and-argentinas-dirty-war/5326675

Rose said (September 30, 2015):

I don't know why you are disappointed. He's not a pope but an anti-pope. It is to be expected that he acts in this manner. The true pope was prevented from taking the papal chair publically in 1958, Cardinal Giuseppe Siri, who took the name Pope Gregory XVII, and his hidden successor is still alive. These events which are unfolding before our eyes were already predicted by St. Paul and St. John from the New Testament, warned about from La Sallete and Fatima, approved apparitions of Our Lady. They all say the same thing. Sede impede. The seat is impeded.

Jonny said (September 30, 2015):

Thanks for this excellent article. Yes, Francis will not mention Christ because it is not politically correct to do so and because the Catholic Church is a political institution above all else. The actions, errors and omissions on the part of the modernist hierarchy since Vatican II has done untold damage to the Catholic Church and many of her most loyal and devout members. Francis's actions and calculated omissions remind me of Pope Paul VI telling the UN assembly that they (rather than Jesus Christ) represent the last hope for humanity. What an outrageous thing for a "Vicar of Christ" to say to a predominantly Socialist assembly. Vatican II caused a massive divide between traditional and modernist Catholics that continues to divide and weaken Roman Catholicism to the point where Sedevacantism ought to be discarded as a tenable theory and replaced by Catholics finally recognizing that the Church's own dogmas of indefectibility and infallibility are and always have been myths. I would like to recommend the book, "The Sedevacantist Delusion: Why Vatican II's Clash with Sedevacantism Supports Eastern Orthodoxy" found at this link: https://www.createspace.com/5440118.

Colm said (September 30, 2015):

Your contributor Al Thompson [below] cites the child abuse scandals in the Catholic Church as proof of its corruption. He ignores the truth that all corporate media generated scandals are, by definition, psy-ops. So the fact that the Catholic Church has been singled out for the psy-op treatment indicates that it is the only real religious enemy of the New World Order. Protestants, Jews, Muslims, Jehovah's Witnesses have all been given a free pass on the clerical abuse issue by the media. Some Irish Protestants, to their great credit, have complained at the way the Irish and international media have studiously ignored clerical child abuse scandals in their denominations. It's also worth noting that the British media - which hammer the Church relentlessly over paedophile clerics - have hysterically rubbished highly credible allegations of paedophile networks among their controllers in the Masonic establishment, and have now begun to viciously character assassinate the accusers. None of which is to deny the truth of what Mr Dunn says about Francis and the modern Church. Two wrongs don't make a right.

Al Thompson said (September 30, 2015):

My experience with Christian churches is that the pastors teach one thing and do another. The Pope is no exception. Given the text of the New Testament, it is my opinion that the Roman Catholic church was never Christian, nor are any of the other churches. They consistently twist the clear words of the scripture to suit their own agenda. The child abuse issues in the Catholic church is a truthful indicator as to who are these religious people. By attending any "Christian" church, one will add to the delusion just by their own presence. This is a lesson I learned the hard way.

The word's attributed to Jesus Christ "you can tell them by their fruits.." is an excellent way of making important judgments. The speech and the actions of a man will always disclose the truth about him. What the pope promoted while in the United States is the exact position of the Catholic Church. My experience is that most religious leaders say one thing and do another. And the hypocrisy is simply another way of lying. In my opinion, people use churches like a baby who uses a pacifier without ever giving any of it any critical thought. I think it is better to stay away from them and to avoid religious groups. There are too many bad things that can happen to someone who engages them.

"Christian" literature is loaded with satanic symbols and many religious leaders use the Satanic hand symbols. They are disclosing to us who they are so it is best to use the warning and stay away from them.

http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2011/11/teaching-and-power-fruit-of-tree.html

JG said (September 30, 2015):

Pope Francis DID meet with Kim Davis on Tuesday in Washington and give her his praise.

As far as the Pope's mention of Abraham, Moses, and Abe Lincoln before the American congress and not the name of Jesus is politically correct and kept him out of scrutiny and conflict with the Christ rejectors on capitol hill. And there are many. This was a classic case of politics winning over Christ to "avoid the conflict".
The early Christian martyrs did not avoid conflicts that the witness of Jesus might bring to them but welcomed it and defended the name of Jesus till death separated them from this world.

Scripture tells us that a friend of the world is the enemy of God. God is not all things to all people. He is one and his Word never changes and is never compromised. And, his alter does not come to the world but the world must come to his altar.

Tony B said (September 30, 2015):

I grew up with that "Robert P." type b.s. [below] but have for years now been sick to death of it. Protestantism is NOT Christianity. It is vicious and self loving. There is NOTHING spiritual about protestantism. They threw all spirituality out the window when they destroyed the true Church in England. Protestants mostly spout the lies originated with the mass murder of Catholics when England and it's Churches were looted by the likes of Netherlands Jewish financed, Christ hating, Cromwell and his robbing butchers of real Christians. I have lived those lies just as have most Americans, most English speaking people, from where emits into the world the very worst evils on the planet as witnessed every day. Lies are lies, whether or not one ties Christ's name to them.

That said, this "Pope" is anything but a Pope. The Catholic Church, the ONLY Church set up by Jesus Christ, has been co-opted at the top (like almost ever church) by talmudist/masonic/satanists so what else would anyone expect from this guy except the masonic "brotherhood of man?" In other words, WE will run the show God created because WE are God and we were created by some mysterious freak happening we like to call "the big bang." A much harder religion to believe in than real Christianity.

But it fits right in with materialistic protestantism.

-

Reply to Tony b.

The Lord Jesus Christ said, “You must be BORN AGAIN” (John 3:3 – 7) Not go be a Catholic.

A man must be BORN into the true church, I never joined my family I was BORN into it.

Robert P said (September 30, 2015):

The Pope is the “Head” of an Anti Christ organization, which is spoken of in Revelation 17.

This “Great Whore” had “Harlot daughters” the other so called protestant denominations, all of which preach their own doctrines above the pure word of God, making every thing else they do worthless.....
Matthew 15:9.

But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. The Lord calls His children out of these Anti Christ systems.....
Revelation 18:4.

And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, (The Great Whore and her Harlot daughters) my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.


Judgement is coming !!!

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Archives >>