Direct Link to Latest News

 

Mother: Is Daycare Good for My Son's Development?

April 14, 2015


boydaycare-photo.jpg


A reader raises her two-year-old
at home but her husband
thinks daycare is necessary to teach
the child to interact and be assertive.
What do you think?
 











by Sandra
(henrymakow.com)

 
I am writing in the hope that you can give me your advice. My husband and I have a two-year-old boy. So far, I refused to go back to work, and have stayed with my child at home, while my husband works full time and supports our family.

This is best for our child, both from my own experience (my parents pushed me into daycare system when I was a kid, and it was sheer torture for me.) I am horrified at the possibility of placing my child in such an environment and scarring him, the way I was scarred.

However, my husband, thinks if we don't give our son to the daycare system soon, he'll run the danger of becoming too 'passive', 'unassertive', and become a 'target for bullies', due to having spent his formative years exclusively at home with his parents.

My parents put me in a daycare at the age of 5, so that I "learn to socialize and be a part of a structured group." (I was an only child, by the way, just as my son is.)

I absolutely hated the following year-and-a-half of my life - I still carry scars. I entered the elementary school and, surprisingly - loved it. It was so different and so much better than the dreaded daycare system.

My husband was sent to JK at the age of 3 and a half and hated it and was bullied through much of his school stay, from the age of three to high school graduation. He partially blames this on the fact  that his parents were late to place him in the educational system. Because he started to socialize late, he never learned to be assertive and avoid/defeat/combat bullying that he was subjected to.

I absolutely dread placing my young son in this early childhood education mincing machine. On the other hand, my husband and a family friend got me paranoid and worried that if we wait for our child to enter the grade 1 at the age of 6 - he will be ill prepared to function optimally in an organized group of kids, too passive, unassertive and quiet. My son, by the way, is very perceptive, quiet and sensitive, yet very active.

In your experience as a parent, as a concerned citizen, and intelligent author, would you be able to please share your opinion on this with me, and / or direct me to some of your or others' articles / texts that discuss this particular issue? 

Do you by any chance know of any studies that deal with correlation of being bullied at school and entering the educational system later (say, at the age of 5) rather than earlier (say, at the age of 2 or 3), or studies that show the exact opposite to hold true? I am starting to do my own internet research on this, but so far not much has come up.

Thank you very much for your reply in advance.

-
This was my reply; I welcome yours:

I am not really "qualified" in this area but my reaction is to support you, In this society you don't want to be socialized. The only daycare I've seen was a pretty cold place but I expect there are better. The spectre of "bullying" is hypothetical. Being forced into a group is no guarantee your son will become assertive. It could have the opposite effect. Stick to your guns and raise your child according to your best instincts.

First Comment from Dan:

Too many men have been brainwashed this way.  Still, I was surprised to read that the father of this boy says he blames being bullied in school on his parents not handing him over to day care before age three.   He must have been born fairly recently, the 1980's perhaps. That's recently enough to have no reference points to know what natural parenting was like before it was hijacked by social engineers.

In the real world both boys and girls learn how to assert and protect themselves from aggressors of any age. If the man fears the boy won't learn self assertion from his own  father, he should use the daycare money to enroll him in a martial arts academy.   If he complains that martial arts isn't gender neutral enough, give him horsemanship lessons. 

By the way, three really is too young to throw the child into 'interaction' with strangers all day with his mother or father not present.  You expect a toddler to 'assert himself' at 2 or 3 years old?  That's why the social engineers insist the 'the younger the better'.   They want them completely helpless.  A three year old boy really is helpless.  He should be with mother, learning interpersonal exchange with her - there is no surrogate for a child's bond with his mother.  The first 4 years should be without the distractions of the 'world'. He's going to have to enter that battlefield soon enough.  There's plenty of development that best happens in the home.  He could learn to read at home.  (I did).

Believe me, when I taught 4th grade Sunday school a fews years ago, I saw the result of today's daycare and 'drive by' parenting.  The boys are already withdrawn and effeminate because day care wont' LET boys assert themselves.

I recommend reading 'Weapons of Mass Instruction' by veteran public school teacher John Taylor Gatto.   And this essay, for starters. Why Schools Don't Educate  

Sandra writes: Many thanks for posting my letter to you on your web site! I read the comments carefully. I immensely appreciate the commenters' willingness to share their own experiences, their opinions, suggestions and advice. These comments strengthened my belief that I am doing the right thing by not "offering" my child on the "altar" of contemporary, urban daycare system.






Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Mother: Is Daycare Good for My Son's Development?"

KJ said (April 16, 2015):

Stay at home with your child. Daycare would provide ANTI social training.

Daycares are a hotbed of illness. You're not allowed in unless you vaccinate your child (we didn't). "Socialization" is a psychiatric concept to socially engineer us into obedient, conformist and restrained zombies.

I found a morning nursery school with a charming and tolerant teacher. My sons went there for a few mornings a week. Otherwise, we ventured out to the art galleries and museums, the park and restaurants. I used to send my kids to the local greasy spoon restaurant for a BLT (bacon, lettuce and tomato sandwich) to practise their manners when they were about 8 and 10. Create!

I ended up homeschooling my kids. They are now 26 and 28. They are both sweet fellows who care about me and Grandma, who try to engage their fellow man in survival activities and who have supported themselves since they were 16. The younger one is a senior stylist at a posh hair salon and the other is a dancer with the Mannheim National Ballet.


MH said (April 15, 2015):

Having worked in a Daycare owned by a hospital chain, as an RN who worked home based Pediatric cases, and having raised children of my own ,without a doubt children are superbly better off both physically and emotionally at home with a loving parent!

Children are socialized out and about with their parents, relatives and family friends!

Would you rather have them in a Daycare where there are children who bite and spread diseases?

My youngest also worked in Pre Schools as a young adult college student and was."Never so sick in her life"! She also recalls the experiences as having been ,"The worst jobs I ever did as far as dealing with moral conflicts."

By example , when certain children who frequently bit others broke the skin or left bite marks, the Manager warned the " teachers" not to tell the victim's parent who did the biting.

In the Infant Room , the babies were placed in the cribs with blankets around their mouths to hold the pacifiers in and the supervising room teacher chastised the employees who picked babies up who were crying to comfort them! At a hundred dollars a day fifteen years ago ,I would have expected my infant's needs were well attended to!
The latter example was the last straw for my daughter who promptly handed in her notice!

There were parents who requested cameras so they could view their children during the day on cell phone apps at work.i recall the panic this instilled amongst the " teachers" who repeated the same old line that the Daycare could not afford it.

The brochure advertised a bi lingual curriculum which in reality translated into singing a little song every day in only one room about the colors in English and in Spanish."Red is rojo" still echoes in my brain That this was aptly labeled a "curriculum" was laughable!

My oldest daughter also experienced the DayCare saga due to her husband's insistence on "socialization" for my Grandson. After enrollment in three or four she finally gave up the myth. My niece ( who is employed by the public school district) told me all throughout the early years of grade school you can tell who went to DayCare ............"

Their emotional behavior was immature compared to the children who stayed home with their parents


Tony B said (April 15, 2015):

Good God! How far removed from reality can people get themselves? This couple thinks they need "studies" to raise their one kid. Okay, study up on what the word "parent" means.

RAISE YOUR OWN KIDS for crying out loud.

I home schooled my kids by myself (my wife left us for the glory of smelly beer bars with all three in diapers - cloth diapers you washed out in those days). It's no big deal to home school. Your kids are learning from you every second they are around you anyway. They watch and copy without even realizing it. Educating them as well as raising them is YOUR JOB, not any organization's. Ask God why he gives kids to parents rather than to soviet daycares and "schools" which don't teach needs for living.

All my grand kids have been home schooled (14 of them) and my great grand kids (6 already) will be also. These offspring, when they were kids, were ALWAYS the first to begin a conversation with other kids, ALWAYS. They developed - BECAUSE THEY WERE RAISED AT HOME - real self-esteem, they didn't need any half baked, brainwashed "teacher" to tell them they needed it.

More to the point of this article, those now grown are all confident people with successful lives. Their employers always ask if there are any other siblings coming up in the family because they want to hire them. Moreover, none of them takes any crap from ANYONE but none of them is unfair to anyone either. Does that answer the couple's questions?

My question is: Why do the questions of this couple even exist?

By the way, they should have MORE kids. That's the very best thing they could do for themselves and their son.


TT said (April 15, 2015):

Sandra stay true to your instincts.. I have a wife and sister-in-law who are of the same philosophy as your husband. I have had 4 children to my wife, the first 2 kids, I insisted that she be a stay-at-home mother, which she did happily, the children were calm, socially adaptable, assertive, kind people. The other 2 were in childcare at very early ages (6-12months old) due to my wife rediscovering her career and ambitions, they are both politically correct (ie homo-friendly, feminist, anti-Christian), brash, arrogant, rude, argumentative...the list goes on. Purely anecdotal data I know, however, plain as day to me.


Mike said (April 14, 2015):

My son was in various daycare from the time he was about 2 years old. He is now 13 and is very quiet and shy, especially at school (not really at all around his good friends and family). So I guess my son had the exact opposite experience of what your husband thinks will happen. He went to a few different daycare's from a very young age and ended up shy and passive anyway. He hasn't really been bullied though, as far as I am aware, though he has been picked on occasionally (in other words, no sustained bullying that I am aware of).


Linda K said (April 14, 2015):

I home schooled both of my kids through high school. My daughter got a BS in Nursing last May, my son is attending college for a degee in HVAC technology.

They are bright, personable, responsible, independent members of society.

My daughter was briefly in school to 3rd grade - she still talks about how much she hated it and was thrilled to be home schooled.

They are not socially inept, can carry on a conversation with all age groups - both adults and their peers.

I was blessed beyond measure to be able to stay home and do this while my husband worked and supported the home financially.

I knew in my heart I was called to do this and I see every day the blessings God has bestowed on these two young adults. I am forever grateful. Those were the best years of my life.

If you sense it isn't good for your baby please go with that intuition. If you are a believer in God - pray for guidance. I promise He will show you.


Jimmy said (April 14, 2015):

Stick to your guns!

My wife and I have a 8 year old, 2 year old (June) and infant. We are 31 and 30 respectively. Keep your children at home. We have decided to have Suzy, my wife, stay home and take care of the kids when I am gone at work and then when I get home we split the work load.

I would never want my kids to go into daycare.

It is expensive.

Kids can have positive social interactions when Mom takes them out of the house into positive play experiences, such as the park, children center, play date with family or friends.

My two year old is a social butterfly. I thank most of his developments to his mother, my wife.

If he goes into public school, he will be well equipped.

Equip yourself in the Armor of Christ and be strong!

You are doing the best thing for your son keeping him home!


Diane said (April 14, 2015):

I am a stay at home mom of three boys. When I first decided to stay home, my husband had daily rantings, but now he agrees it was the best thing.

I have a public health background and have 15 years experience. For the past three years have volunteered 10 hours a week in my kids preschool, kindergarten, etc.

In short, in my opinion, you have done the most important thing, staying home during the first two years. The third year also is tremendously important for a mom to stay home, not necessary at all for day care, but only a few times a week to have some structured playtime.

Try a mom's playgroup co-op or small day care twice a week or so. After what I've seen, and I live in one of the top 10 school districts in the US, teachers can not supervise kids play enough in the 2-3 age group, unless there is a one to five teacher/kid ratio or less.

At three and a half they start needing some structure, social skills/friendship skills (sharing and caring) as well as work on separation, to get them ready for preschool in the fourth year. A co-op is a great way to go, or create your own playgroup where kids can have a snack together and some playtime and sharing. Then by four, they are ready for part or full time preschool.

I think only children do need regular contact with other children, but there are other ways to do that besides daycare. I am still friends to this day with the moms from our local coop, where my kids went during their age two and early three years.


Al Thompson said (April 14, 2015):

I had 2 sons and I avoided any day care unless my wife and I had to go somewhere. I didn't like leaving my son anywhere with people I didn't really know.

My wife stayed home with the boys and that was a blessing for me. I could concentrate on making money and she took care of our household. It worked great.

The real trouble comes from schools; both public and private. I see no value in any schooling as it stands today other than learning to read and write, and develop math skills. The rest of it is garbage which doesn't prepare the young person for any kind of career. Free public education is a plank of the Communist Manifesto so it is natural that people who deploy this system of teaching are communist oriented. The school system naturally attracts psychopaths just as basketball attracts tall people. Idiocy is the product of a communist system.

I think it is best to keep the young people at home for as long as possible. I agree with Henry in that you don't ever what them to be "socialized" in today's environment. School is like an early prison camp that lasts 12 years for high school, and then another 4 years for college.

Day care is a plague on the children as they are put in an unloving environment. Children need to stay at home with mom or dad. This way they don't pick up too many stupid ideas.

I used to hold the same opinion of "socialization" until I saw the horrid results. Sandra has made a very smart and intelligent decision and I don't think she should change anything. Thank God there are still women out there who have the courage to do the right thing for their children.


Lance said (April 14, 2015):

As a father of two girls aged four and three, my wife and I send them two days a week to pre-school at our local Methodist Church. We’re lucky that my wife gave up her career to stay home and raise our girls too.

We decided to put them in so they would have interaction with other kids and it would break our hearts to drop them off five days a week from 7:30-6:00. We’ve sacrificed a lot monetarily but it’s been worth it raising good kids. It’s a big bad world out there and having my wife there with them has been priceless.

There has only been one issue with our four year old and it was a boy pushing her. My advice to her was if he did it again push back (hasn’t happened again). Thanks again for continuing with your site and exposing the bankers who are the puppet masters behind the Punch and Judy show we watch on the news every night.


AG said (April 14, 2015):

Sandra, I work as an advocate against child sexual abuse all day long. I read the cases in the news daily. Often, there are cases of day care facilities where the woman, or her boyfriend, or both, were sexually abusing the children. I watch Judge Judy on television daily (she is a phenomenal Judge, and I love the law). Her cases often involved day care workers.

I would NOT leave my child with ANY of those people. I did not go to any dare care facility as a child. Nor did most of the kids in the 1960's and 1970's. Who leaves their child in a dare care facility with strangers and strange children at such a young and vulnerable age?

I'm sorry, I think it is a bizarre thing to do to a child. Parents need to protect the mind and body of children that young. This is not an age to leave a small child with people who are probably very unstable, and with children who are being raised in homes where their parents are often selfish, depressed, addicted to drugs or alcohol, and who have little or no morals.


Konrad said (April 14, 2015):

I saw a video some time ago where the speaker made glowing references to a book:
MAGICAL CHILD by Joseph Chilton Pearce. It might be worth investigating.

I looked it up on a search engine and it might be one thing the lady is looking for.

Thanks Henry for helping people.!! and all the best to the concerned mother!!


Richard said (April 14, 2015):

I am a product of 8 yrs elementary education at Catholic School in NYC. The standards were very high, the education excellent, yet I was bullied mercilessly every day. This continued when I went to Public High School as I was a shy kid (probably bright high functioning Aspergers’s Syndrome) and the nuns and teachers did almost nothing to stop this behavior, as they were overwhelmed with so many other issues.

As a result I grew up to be a very law biding citizen, but carried enormous scars inside and never lived up to my life potential. I can say somewhat objectively it was because of this situation. I would have fared better with home school.

I was an introverted emotional cripple. I see the need for socialization as it is vital in later life, getting on well with your peers and working cooperatively within a team structure.

But what I went through did no teaching except fear and I don’t have an answer right off to address those necessary skills. As they say you can’t live in a vacuum. I would love to hear comments.


D said (April 14, 2015):

I have a Master's degree in teaching. When my daughter was born, I surprised myself by refusing to send her to daycare, despite my husband's preferences. I became convinced it would be better for her in her formative years to be loved rather than tended to, put on storage, as I was making money to fill our home with plastic toys.

We were struggling financially at that point as new immigrants from Poland. My daughter and I developed a very close bond. We talked and played, and walked to the park, and cooked together. We read books and painted pictures.

I should say my decision did not go well with my husband. Feminism got him. He was very disappointed in my (perceived) inability to appreciate progress. It would be dishonest to say that our marriage was not affected by my decision.

When my daughter was two years old, I tried to please my husband and applied for daycare. There was a wait, as it was a much sought-after place. Finally I took my daughter there for half a day. I was permitted to stay with her. It was a beautiful day in May or June, the window was open, the birds were singing, yet the children were not allowed to go outside for the most part of the day. They asked, but were told to stay indoors.

My daughter never wanted to go back. She said she hated it there - and I could not make myself to begin a brainwashing project, where I would outline before her all the wonderful things about the place. At two she spoke better Polish and English than any of her peers spoke one language.


As parents we have tremendous power to influence our children, to brainwash them. If only we could be sure that we ourselves have not been brainwashed into believing that a two year old needs to learn social skills in a daycare!

In school my daughter did extremely well. She is now a McGill graduate. Yes, she was bullied when younger, because she always stood up for bullied friends, and became a target herself. She was not easily influenced by mob mentality.

There is so much to say, for example I could tell you the story of my friends, who put their one year old in daycare, and she loved it. She cried at first, but gave up trying to convince her mom not to leave her there. She must have realized there was no point, and made the best of her new life. She is doing splendidly now at the age of three. A beautiful and intelligent girl, her language skills are not anywhere near what my daughter's were at two, but it won't make a difference in the future!


Marcos said (April 14, 2015):

This is a complex situation that depends basically on the quality and the time spent on daycare.

Before the kid is three, all he cares is his mother. Three seems to be the best time to start some kind of socialization. In the past, this was done by playing with neighbors and cousins from extended family. Today, there is not much option to day-care.

My kids entered day care at three and it was a very good experience for them. Particularly for the youngest, who used to be very introvert and quiet. He blossomed at day care and became a happier kid. I have no doubts that day care or kindergarten, was good for him.

However, it must be noted that: it was only a part time school, during the morning. The rest of the day he had his mother for himself. Also, it was a quality school, with loving and attentive teachers who sincerely cared for the boys and who allowed the parents wide participation and collaboration with the school. I don't think that this is easy to find or to afford today.

I highly recommend a series of books called "My 3 Year-Old" (and 4, 5, 6, etc) by the Gesell Institute as a good practical instruction manual for the different stages in the life of a child. They were a heaven sent for us and always on the spot.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at