Direct Link to Latest News

 

Gallup CEO Challenges Obama Unemployment Stats

February 8, 2015


gallup-chairman-admits-unemploym-300x180.jpgLeft. Jim Clifton,Chairman and CEO at Gallup, says real rate is 11.2%, not 5.6%.


"There's no other way to say this. The official unemployment rate, which cruelly overlooks the suffering of the long-term and often permanently unemployed as well as the depressingly underemployed, amounts to a Big Lie."





Clifton:  "I may suddenly disappear for telling the truth about Obama unemployment rate."  May not make it home for telling the truth.     He says only 44% of Americans have what a good full time job.


Makow Comment:  Those skewed unemployment numbers have wider implications. They move markets and people can profit or lose.  Gold tanked Friday as the US economy was seen as very strong and the market sold off late in the day as it anticipated a rise in interest rates. It seems that the Cabalist Jewish view that perception is reality, even when based on a lie, has become the norm. Obama and his sponsors profit politically. Do they also profit economically? 






by Jim Clifton
The Big Lie: 5.6% Unemployment


Here's something that many Americans -- including some of the smartest and most educated among us -- don't know: The official unemployment rate, as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor, is extremely misleading.

Right now, we're hearing much celebrating from the media, the White House and Wall Street about how unemployment is "down" to 5.6%. The cheer-leading for this number is deafening. The media loves a comeback story; the White House wants to score political points and Wall Street would like you to stay in the market.

None of them will tell you this: If you, a family member or anyone is unemployed and has subsequently given up on finding a job -- if you are so hopelessly out of work that you've stopped looking over the past four weeks -- the Department of Labor doesn't count you as unemployed. That's right.

 While you are as unemployed as one can possibly be, and tragically may never find work again, you are not counted in the figure we see relentlessly in the news -- currently 5.6%.

Right now, as many as 30 million Americans are either out of work or severely underemployed. Trust me, the vast majority of them aren't throwing parties to toast "falling" unemployment.

There's another reason why the official rate is misleading. Say you're an out-of-work engineer or healthcare worker or construction worker or retail manager: If you perform a minimum of one hour of work in a week and are paid at least $20 -- maybe someone pays you to mow their lawn -- you're not officially counted as unemployed in the much-reported 5.6%. Few Americans know this.

unemployed1.jpgYet another figure of importance that doesn't get much press: those working part time but wanting full-time work. If you have a degree in chemistry or math and are working 10 hours part time because it is all you can find -- in other words, you are severely underemployed -- the government doesn't count you in the 5.6%. Few Americans know this.

There's no other way to say this. The official unemployment rate, which cruelly overlooks the suffering of the long-term and often permanently unemployed as well as the depressingly underemployed, amounts to a Big Lie.

And it's a lie that has consequences, because the great American dream is to have a good job, and in recent years, America has failed to deliver that dream more than it has at any time in recent memory. A good job is an individual's primary identity, their very self-worth, their dignity -- it establishes the relationship they have with their friends, community and country. When we fail to deliver a good job that fits a citizen's talents, training and experience, we are failing the great American dream.

Gallup defines a good job as 30+ hours per week for an organization that provides a regular paycheck. Right now, the U.S. is delivering at a staggeringly low rate of 44%, which is the number of full-time jobs as a percent of the adult population, 18 years and older. We need that to be 50% and a bare minimum of 10 million new, good jobs to replenish America's middle class.

I hear all the time that "unemployment is greatly reduced, but the people aren't feeling it." When the media, talking heads, the White House and Wall Street start reporting the truth -- the percent of Americans in good jobs; jobs that are full time and real -- then we will quit wondering why Americans aren't "feeling" something that doesn't remotely reflect the reality in their lives. And we will also quit wondering what hollowed out the middle class.
----



Thanks to Robert for the tip!

Related- Fiddling With Temperature data is greatest Science Scandal Ever
-----------
"Dishonesty, intellectual and moral, has been elevated to an ontological principle and foundation of the modern western political thought and culture."- Lavrov
------------Tyler Durden of Zero Hedge weighs in

 
First Comment from Al Thompson

I have to admire the candid remarks by Mr. Clifton.  I'm thinking that his numbers are very conservative.  In my opinion, the "unemployment rate" is probably closer to 18-20%.  However, whatever the true numbers are, they are bad and it is the results of the dummies in government.  I call them govtards; university- educated intellectual morons.  Their college educations didn't do much to help them properly manage the "government" as we have come to know it.  The fact is, with these numbers, it means that 10 million people are losing their skills and causing family quarrels because of bad finances.

Bankers don't give a crap because they can just "print" or create more money and then charge the people even more interest on money that was never earned.  Government is just a reflection of the idiotic banking system which has proven itself over a period of centuries as a proven failure.  The bankers can't argue with that because just like anyone else, their value is measured by the results of their actions.  Usury must go.

I think it is better for young people to develop skills more associated with their talents and interests and work for themselves.  The skills pay the bills.  If you decide to work for a corporation, you had better have a Plan B because it is only a matter of time the management will stab you in the back, leaving yourself and your family frantically trying to find work.  It's better to work for yourself and then these numbers won't mean anything.

The "big lie" of 5.6% unemployment rate just goes to show how govtards will do anything to make themselves look good, when in fact they stink.





 


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Gallup CEO Challenges Obama Unemployment Stats"

Gordon said (April 16, 2015):


This question has also disturbed me for many years as I could never make economic sense of it until I saw the light. Here in South Africa the franchise restaurants dominate the market and they operated on a churn and burn basis. The basic premise is that someone (a sucker) gets a retirement / retrenchment package and this together with their life savings is “invested” in purchasing a franchise restaurant. This sucker then lives in a fools paradise of running their own business and making losses for a year or two until such time as all the funds are exhausted or they run out of credit.


Bill D said (February 10, 2015):

Thanks for your very informative posts. The latest article suggesting official U.S. unemployment figures are deliberately misleading is little different than the situations in other industrial countries. It is certainly true here in New Zealand. One way the numbers are distorted are the large numbers of people on government-sponsored "training" courses and many with part time jobs being classed among the employed when often they earn little more, and frequently no more, than an unemployment benefit.

About a week ago you posted an article from Oliver Heydorn of Canada on some of the proposals of the Social Credit movement. Among Social Crediters "unemployment" is regarded as a perfectly normal result of increasing automation and ought to be seen as a desirable social advance in that increasing numbers of people can be freed from compulsory work.

However, purchasing power, in relation to production, needs to still be distributed to all. Social Crediters hold that the natural physical world is one of huge abundance. This flies in the face of university taught economics, but then university-taught economics is largely a mixture of misunderstandings, lies and mumbo-jumbo.


Tony B said (February 9, 2015):

Both George and Susan (below) are moving in the right direction.

As usual, neither gets to the heart of the problem: criminally dysfunctional money creation. Rothschild style money creation is simply a conveyor belt of all wealth to the Rothschilds. This makes life a never ending struggle even for the "old" way of factories with hundreds of jobs.

Even if government got rid of all the monopoly capitalist corporate laws which make free enterprise an impossibility against monopoly corporation producers and also franchises, malls and chain retailers, thus making almost all business (and therefore work) local, there will never again be enough jobs. The simple fact is that when production is brought back to the U.S., the new factories will produce items that used to require 500 workers with maybe twenty or thirty.

So, if the producers of products and reasonable government want those products to be bought and used by people then most people will have to be GIVEN the means to buy them. In fact, they'll have to be given the means to simply be alive. Something similar to social credit will have to be implemented.

This knowledge is probably why the self appointed elites (Bill Gates for one) want to reduce world population to almost nothing.

Free exchange medium would give people the means to have real and worthwhile lives as described by George but it would also allow them to be worse than they already are in our pagan nation. Without a return to true religion wherein obedience to the demands of God come first, such a classic utopia as the middle ages knew in Europe will never come about again. Without that we will simply descend faster into ever more miserable worldly hells.


Austin-Australian View said (February 9, 2015):

Hi Henry - we've had to put up with these kinds of lies from government departments here in Australia for decades. I once worked for the former Commonwealth Employment Service (CES) and saw first hand just how those figures were gathered. I was responsible for collecting the statistics for the end of the month report that went to HQ.

The same kind of rules applied back then - if you worked for an hour or more a month then you weren't counted in that month's figures - simple as that. Also, the so called 5% unemployment figure that gets bandied about all the time, looks to me like an "agreed" figure amongst failing governments, the world over.

Politicians are judged on their performance, not their rhetoric, and as you can see from two state elections recently held here Downunder, when governments promise everything and give you nothing, the people toss them out with huge losses against their previous electoral margin wins.

I think that people over there and over here, are starting to develop long memories when it comes to politicians and their promises (lies) but maybe it's too late for that? At least the people will stand up and be counted nowadays, whereas in the past, they'd just put it down to another bunch of broken election promises, and forget about it.

The Abbot government here in Oz has tried to introduce the same austerity measures that were meted out to Greece and the other 'PIGS' countries, but it hasn't worked. The treasurer, Joe Hockey couldn't sell last year's budget for love nor money, as the people are finally waking up to just what "austerity measures" really means - no future...

This morning, prime minister Tony Abbot scored a 61/39 vote in favour of himself, during an attempted spill motion in Canberra - never the less, all the experts on the sidelines are saying that his days are numbered anyway. With 40% of his own party room against him it will be only a matter of time until he falls on his sword.

Political chaos seems to be the new norm across the western world as governments crack and crumble under the weight of huge unpayable bankster driven debt, with no obvious way forward for the little people.
That's what happens when governments tell lies in order to make themselves look good in front of the crowd - it all falls apart eventually.

Nine days after the local Queensland state election, we still have no premier and no permanent government in place, as the people have indicated their displeasure at the same kind of lies and arrogance. It may be down to an independent to hold the balance of power, but will the political parties learn anything from it? Probably not.


Susan said (February 8, 2015):

Totally agree with George’s comment below; however in practice very difficult to do.

Once you extract all of the national chains from any medium to large city the only other significant employers that would provide ‘livable’ incomes are government institutions (i.e. education, military criminal,) medical institutions, banking institutions and technological industries. The ‘institutions’ are parasitical nature and are actually responsible for the ‘unlivable’ conditions that we now find ourselves in. One group of the population is living off the other group without being able to provide the fundamental resources required for ‘life;’ food, water, shelter and heating. Most cities are no longer surrounded by farms or ranches that could produce the amount of food required to even feed one city. Our populations are not ‘producing,’ we are feeding off each other while the ‘controllers’ are use currency as a mediation factor.

In order to have a “life” at this point as an individual in the USA we have to restructure our whole economy. People have to stop consuming and start generating solutions to the crisis that is taking place. Institutional corruption is the primary limitation in solving this crisis and it starts at a local level.


George said (February 8, 2015):

I have my own view of the matter. I believe that there are two words that a young person should remove from his or her vocabulary. One is job. The other is career. What we need to do instead is to live a life. The industrial revolution created lots of so-called jobs that were really slave labor. Robots can take over many of those activities and will do so. Henry Ford was a big man, who offered the best pay he could manage to produce a product he believed in for people who could pay for them with the genuine belief that it would enrich their lives. The dream turned into a nightmare in ways he could not have envisioned, but the concept of lifetime employment for such companies was intoxicating, and became a form of voluntary servitude. The dream of pensions, fulfilled for a time, merely locked in that servitude.

We should never forget the value of free time, the necessity of self-reliance, nor lose our repugnance to all forms of servility. Of course freedom is dangerous. But slavery has its own terrible dangers, when the ship on which the slaves are sailing is sunk. And increasingly, those ships are sinking. The CEO of Gallup means well. But the semantics are misleading. What young people need to be focused on is not finding a job or a career, but building a life.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at