David S said (February 21, 2015):

Bill Gates and Co only believe in population cull.
I had all three,measles, Numbs and chicken pox but no vaccines to cure them except the immune system,resulting in an iron constitution.

Stephen Coleman said (February 20, 2015):

"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine."

This has been my argument for years, the day I saw 2 contradicting studies released on the same day. One study disappeared 3 days later, no discussion, no explanation. So much for "peer review".

Science, I contend has degenerated into a fundamentalist religion and its apologists are as narrow and hard headed as any hard core minister. You certainly don't dare question any of their high priests in our universities that mistakenly believe they know something.

According to friend that worked in a vax lab, contamination of vax batches is common and they are marketed anyway with their full knowledge.

I don't consider myself anti-vax, as I have seen them stop livestock epidemics more than once. But they should be considered on a batch to batch bases and some vax I completely discourage their use.

Catherine said (February 19, 2015):

well, now this is confirmation.

I got polio vaccine in Ireland in 1964 and 2012 got diagnosed with lymph c cells.

Naturopath confirmed SV40.

Greg P said (February 19, 2015):

here was also a story I read a few years back that the IPV (inactivated virus) injectable Salk vaccine was also associated with Mesothelioma or Asbestosis.

Meaning that it explained why people who could not have had exposure to asbestos contracted mesothelioma.

I was thinking what a cop out for big pharma to destroy a building product to cover up such a possibility.

A huge coincidence with Polio was DDT. Happened in summer, High sugar intake and all paralysis was "Polio". Usually happened in the more affluent "white" community.

After the vaccine was introduced DDT was phased out and paralysis diagnoses for many types were separated from the Polio cause.
All a big con.

After looking at this for more than 20 years I do not think profit is the main motive. Very handy to have mind you.

I am looking more at the population control model and general sickness preventing communities from being as dynamic as they could be.

Fits in very well with the protocols.
Also the autistic spectrum of illnesses do provide another interesting factor. People with this disorder do display a propensity to be easily regimented and led by a strict set of rules
This is documented by the late Harris Coulter in his book "Vaccination, Social Violence and Criminality". He looked at the mental history of serial killers and the like. The capacity to recruit sufferers of such disorders for violent psychopathic groups and organizations would be a godsend for the NWO and lovers of the protocols.
There are a lot more candidates now than there were in Coulter's time.

My observations are very limited and amateur. Perhaps others can corroborate this?

TWH said (February 19, 2015):

As a child I was, unfortunately, subjected to all the childhood vaccinations that were required in the late 70s/early 80s. The last vaccine I ever had was back in 1992 (a flu shot). I didn't know much about vaccines, other than the media line that they were miraculous at fighting disease, therefore I ignorantly got one. I ended up being stricken with the flu a few days later. That was it for me and vaccines.
I sense that the corporate-controlled media is engaging in another psy-op on the general population in order to frighten people into obediently getting those inoculations filled with such "preservatives" (the big pharma word for them) as aluminum, mercury, and formaldehyde. They tried the scare with H1N1 influenza and now they're doing it again with measles.

With the way some folks are carrying on, one would think that measles was the new black death. Get a load of this woman ( http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2015/02/11/pickering-moms-facebook-post-goes-viral-after-babys-potential-exposure-to-measles.html ). Her histrionics and fanaticism make me cringe. These people are not content to poison their own bodies, but want to force me into poisoning mine also.
Marco asked if the vaccine manufacturers pay for this kind of support or if people are just stupid. I won't discount the fact that paid shills do exist all over internet forums and social media in order to promote falsehoods, but never underestimate the stupidity of the masses. The vast majority of people these days get virtually all their information from the electric propaganda box (a.k.a. television). If some twit in a suit and tie gets on the box and says something is true, well then it must be!
God help us.

Tony B said (February 18, 2015):

There is really nothing to discuss about vaccines, nothing to debate. The damned things are poison, period. Even without the protocols calling for them to be used to poison the goy.

There are two healthy actions to take for the sake of your kids that keep them away from vaccines.

1. Have your babies at home. Most hospitals don't give a damn what the parents want, they grab the newborn child and stick needles full of poison into them.

2. HOME SCHOOL! It turns a life of hell fighting the lies schools tell kids to alienate them from their parents into a REAL FAMILY. Plus it's amazingly easy, not something that requires a college degree. Do you really think God meant for every family to go to college before they raised their kids? For most of mankind's existence schools did not exist. Gee, how did we ever make it to today? Just think outside the box of the stupid, Prussian "sit down all day and be brainwashed" nonsense.

Too, you can tell the schools to stick their mandatory shots.

My kids never had shots. Were almost never sick compared to my sister's kids who got all the establishment crap, even the stupid, worthless, dime store "vitamins," and they were often sick.

Now one of my daughters-in-law has a business helping people to have their babies at home and ALL my grandkids are home schooled and so will be the already six great grand kids.

Marco said (February 18, 2015):

About two days ago I posted a comment on the National Post website for an article that was pushing more ridiculous 'measles propaganda'.
I don't know if the majority of posters are fanatically supportive of pharmaceutical companies (for some unknown reason), ignorant, or paid trolls. But I caused a huge flood of responses in about 10 minutes because I posted a comment along the lines of "Vaccines are dangerous, and numerous physicians, neurosurgeons, researchers etc. provide ample evidence for this...". So I got a good laugh out of all the grown up ignorants calling me an idiot, and that I shouldn't be allowed in public etc.
People even have the audacity to call for mandatory vaccines - do vaccine manufacturers have to pay for this kind of support or are people just stupid?

Unfortunately it seems like many Canadians buy the pharmaceutical BS hook, line and sinker. I wouldn't put anything in my body that has the potential to cause any significant harm to my health, my body is too good to me to do that to it.
And it goes without question that something potentially seriously harmful to health shouldn't ever be forced on anyone, let alone children.

Since when did vaccines become so safe that it has to be forced on us now? If it becomes mandatory to have your children vaccinated at birth in this country, then see you later Canada for me.

Robert K said (February 18, 2015):

People who oppose vaccinations have argued that if the vaccinations are effective then those opting to receive them cannot complain about being in danger from disease contracted by the unvaccinated. This irrefutable logic required a rebuttal by the promoters of vaccination, and they came up with one. They said that some people who would like to be protected by vaccination cannot be because of some pre-existing condition, and therefore their health is jeopardized by those who refuse vaccines.

However, because vaccination itself clearly produces extreme health-threatening reactions in at least a small percentage of the population, the same argument could be made that their interests are harmed by blanket vaccination programs. Yet these susceptible individuals are ignored in the media reporting on this issue, which constantly harps on the potential damage only to the other group.

t reminds me of the (failed) attempt to persuade the population of Hull, Quebec to accept fluoridation of the public water supply about a decade ago. A health officer promoting the change for the city advised the public that the amount added was very small, so there was no danger that it could do any harm. At the time I pointed out that if that was the case then presumably it was also true that such a tiny amount could do no good.

The financial interests involved in medicine these days are so immense and politically connected that scientifically impartial information is practically unobtainable.

Robert K said (February 18, 2015):

People who oppose vaccinations have argued that if the vaccinations are effective then those opting to receive them cannot complain about being in danger from disease contracted by the unvaccinated. This irrefutable logic required a rebuttal by the promoters of vaccination, and they came up with one. They said that some people who would like to be protected by vaccination cannot be because of some pre-existing condition, and therefore their health is jeopardized by those who refuse vaccines. However, because vaccination itself clearly produces extreme health-threatening reactions in at least a small percentage of the population, the same argument could be made that their interests are harmed by blanket vaccination programs. Yet these susceptible individuals are ignored in the media reporting on this issue, which constantly harps on the potential damage only to the other group.

t reminds me of the (failed) attempt to persuade the population of Hull, Quebec to accept fluoridation of the public water supply about a decade ago. A health officer promoting the change for the city advised the public that the amount added was very small, so there was no danger that it could do any harm. At the time I pointed out that if that was the case then presumably it was also true that such a tiny amount could do no good.

The financial interests involved in medicine these days are so immense and politically connected that scientifically impartial information is practically unobtainable.

Al Thompson said (February 18, 2015):

I grew up having to take the polio vaccine in the 1950s. In my early 60s I was told that I had "lung" cancer. I used an alternative treatment for the cancer and I'm still here. I would not underestimate the dangers of the vaccines. The vaccines are a major profit center for the drug companies. Think about it, they make money on the vaccines and then later on these same drug companies make money of the so-called cure for cancer.

Who benefits? Drug companies. Where is the money going to? drug companies.

My problem with this kind of information is in trying to relay it to other people. I have been excoriated by friends and family for talking about the phony cancer treatments or the dangers of vaccines. I would not take a vaccine for any reason as I think God made the immune systems for mankind perfectly.

http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2013/08/chemo-carnage.html