Direct Link to Latest News

 

Illuminati Promote Both Sides of Ukraine Crisis?

September 3, 2014

icdjacbh.jpg
Left, Ukraine Truth Where You'd Least Expect It  - The Sept-Oct issue of Foreign Affairs

Since its inception in 1921,  the Council on Foreign Relations has been
a key instrument of Illuminati control. From the start, Foreign Affairs has been
its house organ.

When Illuminati errand boys David Cameron and Barack Obama
compare Vladimir Putin to Hitler and castigate Russia for "its aggression," 
an article in Foreign Affairs, Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West's Fault,
totally discredits
them.

Is the
Illuminati promoting both sides of this conflict?










John Mearsheimer, a West Point grad and US Air Force veteran, is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago.
His 2007 book with Stephen Walt, The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy was a best seller. 




by John Mearsheimer
Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West's Fault
excerpt by henrymakow.com


According to the prevailing wisdom in the West, the Ukraine crisis can be blamed almost entirely on Russian aggression. Russian President Vladimir Putin, the argument goes, annexed Crimea out of a long-standing desire to resuscitate the Soviet empire, and he may eventually go after the rest of Ukraine, as well as other countries in eastern Europe. In this view, the ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 merely provided a pretext for Putin's decision to order Russian forces to seize part of Ukraine.

But this account is wrong: the United States and its European allies share most of the responsibility for the crisis. The taproot of the trouble is NATO enlargement, the central element of a larger strategy to move Ukraine out of Russia's orbit and integrate it into the West. At the same time, the EU's expansion eastward and the West's backing of the pro-democracy movement in Ukraine -- beginning with the Orange Revolution in 2004 -- were critical elements, too.

Since the mid-1990s, Russian leaders have adamantly opposed NATO enlargement, and in recent years, they have made it clear that they would not stand by while their strategically important neighbor turned into a Western bastion. For Putin, the illegal overthrow of Ukraine's democratically elected and pro-Russian president -- which he rightly labeled a "coup" -- was the final straw. He responded by taking Crimea, a peninsula he feared would host a NATO naval base, and by working to destabilize Ukraine until it abandoned its efforts to join the West.

putinexpression.jpg(Putin greeting Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko last week. What's with the obsequious expression on Putin's face? Is Petro a 35 degree Mason and Putin only 32?)

Putin's pushback should have come as no surprise. After all, the West had been moving into Russia's backyard and threatening its core strategic interests, a point Putin made emphatically and repeatedly. Elites in the United States and Europe have been blindsided by events only because they subscribe to a flawed view of international politics. They tend to believe that the logic of realism holds little relevance in the twenty-first century and that Europe can be kept whole and free on the basis of such liberal principles as the rule of law, economic interdependence, and democracy.

But this grand scheme went awry in Ukraine. The crisis there shows that realpolitik remains relevant -- and states that ignore it do so at their own peril. U.S. and European leaders blundered in attempting to turn Ukraine into a Western stronghold on Russia's border. Now that the consequences have been laid bare, it would be an even greater mistake to continue this misbegotten policy.


 .........

U.S. and European leaders blundered in attempting to turn Ukraine into a Western stronghold on Russia's border.  Imagine the American outrage if China built an impressive military alliance and tried to include Canada and Mexico.

......

The United States and its allies should abandon their plan to westernize Ukraine and instead aim to make it a neutral buffer.



Thanks to Krister for bringing this to my attention

Related-

Israel and Putin Maintain Close Ties - Israel Did Not Condemn Crimea Annexation
http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/04/israel-russia-strategic-ties-ukraine.html
Putin Gentle on Israel Pounding of Gaza- Jews find him sympathetic

Remember Iraq? Former US intel officers warn Merkel against NATO images of Ukraine
http://rt.com/usa/184512-vips-memo-merkel-nato/

The Downing of MH17 - Is Israel Involved?
http://bollyn.com/14832/

----------

First Comment from Barry

The Illuminati have a history of promoting both sides of major wars, but is this the case in Ukraine?  Going back to the chemical weapon attack in Syria, Putin appeared as the saviour on the world stage and offered a solution.  His statesman-like approach and body language gave the impression that he was truly resisting the NWO.   Then came the coup d'état in Kiev and the overthrow of a democratically government.  Putin responded with the annexation of Crimea, a move to secure Russian strategic interests, which seemed like a reasonable response.  The people of Crimea voted to join Russia and the separatists took up positions in Eastern Ukraine.  The stage is now set with the Zionist-controlled puppets on one side and Putin on the other.  

I hope that Putin is truly resisting the NWO and his speech in Munich certainly gave that impression.  But one thing does not make sense in this story.  Kiev did not fall in a day.   According to Zionist, Victoria Nuland, $5 billion of US cash had been spent to facilitate the transition of Ukraine into the EU.  Also, George Soros set up a Foundation in Ukraine, which he has admitted, played a part in events happening today.   This raises several questions.  Did Putin not see this coming?  Surely he was aware of the process taking place to promote the EU and ferment anti-Russian sentiment in Ukraine?   It seems that for whatever reason, he did little to counter this subversive process and allowed it to develop. 

For sure, we would all like to see Superman appear out of the blue and demolish the evil technocrats who plan to dominate the world.  It's a frequent theme in Hollywood movies, and as much as I would like to believe Putin is that man,  I am yet to be convinced.








Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Illuminati Promote Both Sides of Ukraine Crisis? "

Marti said (September 4, 2014):

Hi Henry. Yes they do and it`s called 'Order Out of Chaos', which is a Masonic motto. My ex came from a family that were Masons - Freemasons - Eastern Star - Rainbow Girls and of course Demolay for the boys. I had no idea what Masonry was or anything about it and really didn`t learn anything until I was divorced. I was divorced 19 years ago and have been researching all of the connections ever since. Order Out of Chaos is the same thing as thesis, anti-thesis and synthesis.


Lance said (September 4, 2014):

I say we're being played.

Mearsheimer is right.

Does anyone else see a Masonic hand shake in the picture?

Why is Putin smiling oddly?

I've read that he is a Freemason and a Jew (mother's side)


Rick said (September 4, 2014):

I agree with Barry. As much as I would like to believe that Putin is not working for the Illuminati, I am yet to be convinced. I think it more likely the Rothschilds continue to pull the strings of everyone involved.


RR said (September 4, 2014):

It is my opinion that the Ukraine is being set up to become the restored Khazarian Homeland. While everyone is distracted with the middle east, and the bloody religious zeal of Israel (which is getting more and more coverage...oddly enough) I believe the truth is that under the one world government it will be the restored and expanded Ukraine (New Khazaria) that will be the head of the world. Everything else is a front and a scam.

All you need to do is look at all the horrors the Ukrainian people have suffered in the last 100 years and it starts to become clear in my opinion. Israel is just a front, the Hebrews have long been eliminated and the real prize , other than a totalitarian repressive world government nightmare, is the realization of 10 centuries work on restoring the Khazar homeland.

I feel that the Ukrainians suffering has only just begun unfortunately.


Bert said (September 4, 2014):

I don't believe Putin is in on it. Absolutely not. He has oligarchs and a Bolshevik fifth column at home as well that he has to smooch with. But when we hear Putin talking about the dangers of a "unipolar world," I believe he is truly speaking from his heart. The "Danger of a Unipolar World" as he calls it, is the danger of Illuminati cutouts like Halliburton, Blackwater and the Texas mafia controlling the resources in central Asia, from opium, to oil. (By comparison, NATO is somewhat of an old bedbug. Everyone knows that it has no political legitimacy. As a military power, it is disorderly and impotent, the occasional bravado of hotdogs and showoffs notwithstanding.)


Henrique said (September 3, 2014):

I find it laughable that people are naive and stupid enough to think that Putin or any other Russian leader could simply surrender Sevastopol ( only Russian naval base in the Black Sea ) to a bunch of puppet thugs of the west and remain as "leader". The simple thought is ridiculous - that's pure geopolitics; when the Americans were funding the agitators ( 5 billion, according to Nudelman ) they knew they were pushing Adolf Putin into a corner, and I bet they already had the whole demonization-propaganda ready. Ukraine is an artificial country with 2 cultures - the East being Russian, the West pro-Western Europe ( and in fact strongly RESENTED against Russia for the Holodomor ).

A powder keg in an EXTREMELY convenient location for NATO and the war-planners. Crimea was supposedly GIVEN to Ukraine by drunken Russian leaders, right ? Even PC Roberts, with all of his pompous intellectual dignity, wants us to accept that, of course. Holy Vodka.

Another detail is the more or less " authorized" anti-semitism that prevailed in some circles there ( even academic ). Now why would the esoteric hierarchy ALLOW that anti-semitic resentment to flourish there ( eventually culminating in the Right Sector, the "strong arm" of the Maidan ) when it readily ( and fiercely ) squashes it everywhere else, through organizations like ADL, JDL, SPLC, ACLU, and equivalents? Resentments and artificial countries are useful, just look at Iraq.

The brothers, the poor widow's sons of Yanukovich's police ( Police everywhere is full of Masons ) didn't react to the initial vandalism, and let it spiral out of control, encouraging the organized violent element ( Right Sector ) to take over the protests. Why? They could have shoved that cookie up Nudelman's ass, as far as I'm concerned.

This is a chess game being played, and people are just stupid enough to get emotionally involved ( exactly what they want ). At the same time the actions of Israel get a little more "bad press", enough to burst emotions being inculcated in the masses for decades by the anti-Israel left, causing among other events, attacks on Jewish children in Europe. A Europe being invaded by immigrants from countries European governments are bombing, of course. It's tragicomic, in a sense. Remember Albert Pike's famous letter about the three World Wars...



Krister said (September 3, 2014):

The motive or reason, might be that the escalating political (and behind the scene, proxy military) confrontation in Ukraine, might be contra productive to the larger plan of first finishing of the Assad-regime in Syria and later the same for Iran. This, now when ISIS is successfully planted as a tool to give USA(Israel) a political green-card to start bombing Syria. So why risk the larger plan if Ukraine can be set on hold (or ice) until the matter of Assad and Iran can be successfully attended.

ISIS seems also to be the perfect tool to spread the ME-war to Europa and other continents, in the spirit of Albert Pike and his three World Wars. Not to forget Leon Trotsky's perpetual revolution (ie. wars).

http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike.htm


The Rahnameh said (September 3, 2014):

No, the Neocon/Zionist cabal is not playing both sides, but they are scapegoating the blame for what they've done on to both sides. Nuland (aka Nudelman) and her husband Robert Kagan are an important link -- she's the Neocon/Zionist implant in the State Department.

She and other shadow government forces outside of the nationalist currents (which exist) are responsible for Ukraine. They all represent the Rothschild Cartel and the Illuminati HQ, Israel.

Like with all their other deeds, they scapegoat the banner, color and authority of Gentile host nations to hide their own bloodied hands in the mess.


JG said (September 3, 2014):

I would have to disagree that the Illuminati is on both sides of this conflict.

This is the new era of world ordered government where all nations that demand the right to self determination like the people of Ukraine and Syria are automatically targeted for invasion.

The outlawing of sovereignty among the nations is the only side the NWO/Illuminati is on. Yes, they will add fuel to these conflicts by funding both sides to make it more bloody and deadly but their end game of total dominance is always the same.

Putin is not the aggressor in this conflict at all nor did he instigate the Crimean vote for independence from the Ukraine.

He has exercised patience and restraint and wants nothing more than a peaceful resolve to this conflict and this why he has been demonized by the Western Media.

I really wonder sometimes if Vladimir is aware of who and what he is dealing with here. America is no longer a sovereign Christian Republic that is rooted in a constitutional government. It also has no coherent foreign policy with any consistency other than deception.

The "Israeli Cons" are in control of American Foreign Policy and have been since the 2nd term of Bill Clinton who was placed into the American presidency to implement this NWO global agenda.

Wars, lies, and deception is America's new foreign policy now that has put in place to achieve world hegemony for the NWO empire and NOT ITSELF.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at