The Jew of Wall Street
January 18, 2014
(left, Leonardo di Caprio as Jordan Belfort)
Throughout history, organized Jewry subverted Christian
societies and undermined Christian values. The movie,
The Wolf of Wall Street, continues this tradition
by glorifying and normalizing deviant, degenerate behavior.
"The goyim are a flock of sheep and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock?"
-Protocols of the Elders of Zion, 11
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
"The Wolf of Wall Street," directed by Martin Scorsese, is a movie about Jews ripping off goyim and wasting themselves with cocaine and prostitutes. But you wouldn't know it because the protagonist is a goy played by Leonardo diCaprio, better to spread the movie's satanic values.
Just as many Jews changed their names, Hollywood has skewed ethnicity. For example, in Chicago, the Jewish lawyer played by Richard Gere is the Irish "Billy Flynn." In Shattered Glass, the Jewish homosexual plagiarist is portrayed as a straight gentile, better to convince the goyim that gay-Jewish behavior is their behavior. In Mean Streets, Martin Scorsese makes the street criminals white, although in real life they are black. Throughout history, anti Semitism was justified because Jews subverted Christian societies and undermined Christian values assisted by their Freemason proxies. The Wolf of Wall Street is the story of Jewish stock swindler Jordan Belfort who sold his clients millions in fraudulent securities. He ended up crashing on drugs, divorcing and spending 22 months in jail. He still hasn't repaid his victims.
Typically, the movie opened Christmas Day.
THE REAL STORY
The real story is not told. Why did Belfort and his Jewish colleagues feel no remorse about taking peoples' life savings? It's because they are goyim!
(Jonah Hill, left, plays the only explicitly Jewish character, Donnie Azoff)
"But, just between us [Jews], let's talk about Belfort-the-Jew -- let's go there. In the movie, you never really understand how someone so gifted can be so morally unmoored. But in his memoir, upon which the movie is based, whenever Belfort refers to his Jewish roots, the diagnosis becomes more apparent.
He is a kid from Long Island. His dad, Max, grew up "in the old Jewish Bronx, in the smouldering economic ashes of the Great Depression." Belfort didn't grow up poor by any means, he just wasn't rich enough. The hole in him wasn't from poverty, but from desire for acceptance. The "blue-blooded WASPs," Belfort writes, "viewed me as a young Jewish circus attraction."
Belfort had a chip on his shoulder the size of a polo pony, and so did everyone he recruited. They were, he writes, "the most savage young Jews anywhere on Long Island: the towns of Jericho and Syosset. It was from out of the very marrow of these two upper-middle-class Jewish ghettos that the bulk of my first hundred Strattonites had come...." [He gave his company the goy name Oakmount Stratton.]
(left, the real Jordan Belfort)
It's not complicated, really. Poor little Jordan wanted to show those WASPs whose country clubs he couldn't join that he was smarter, richer, better. What he failed to understand is that just about every Jew, every minority, shares the same impulses. But only a select few decide the only way to help themselves is to hurt others. "
Eshman engages in the typical Jewish self-deception - the belief that Jews are reacting to anti-Semitism when in fact many cause it in the first place. The Talmud preaches that non-Jews are animals created to serve the Chosen. It is attitudes and behaviour stemming from this racism, and the Satanism inherent in the Cabala, that has caused anti-Semitism.
Eshman asks Jews to examine if there is something fundamentally wrong with their values: "Belfort, like Bernie Madoff, is an extreme example. These are guys who feel they have nothing, they are nothing, so they will do anything to acquire everything. They cross a pretty clear line and just keep going.
The question that gnaws at me is whether there's something amiss in the vast gray area that leads right up to that line. Are the Belforts and Madoffs unnatural mutations, or are they inevitable outgrowths of attitudes that have taken root in our communities?
These days, we are deep in the pit arguing over the American Studies Association's (ASA) boycott of Israeli academics and whether Jewish students at Swarthmore College's Hillel should host anti-Zionist speakers... But are these conversations we need to be having [as] ... our communities become breeding grounds for the next Madoff, the next Belfort. That's not a movie. That's a shame."
KUDOS to Rob Eshman for going as far as he does. But Jews have to go further and recognize that Cabalist Judaism is essentially a satanic cult. The fact that it has taken over the world in the guise of secularism does not make it any less so. And everyone needs to attack Hollywood for its pernicious influence on modern society. One screenwriter actually confronted Scorsese and DiCaprio at a screening, saying "Shame on you. Disgusting." An actress Hope Holliday tweeted, "Three hours of torture. Same disgusting crap, over and over again." And the daughter of one of Belfort's lieutenants went public exposing the sham of this lifestyle. "Behind all of it was really just insidious soul-sucking shame masked by addiction, which we love to call ambition, which is really just greed."
Another rap against Jews was that they do not produce anything, but just trade. I don't think that's true of most who are very hard working in a variety of professions. Still the stock market has become a giant casino and the goyim now are also traders big time. CNBC is 24-hr buy and sell. For every development, the question is "What's the trade?" Then Jim Cramer comes on with "Mad Money" and riles the goyim some more.
The stock market is bigger than porn. Who can resist the temptation to make large sums with a few keystrokes?
The Wolf of Wall Street pretends to be a cautionary tale. But ultimately it promotes the thing it pretends to condemn and makes me ask, "Are Illuminati Jews and Freemasons leading us to a crash similar to Jordan Belforts?"
First Comment by C:
Finally decided to sit through "wolf of wall st." yesterday after reading your article...
I am surprised that no one talks about how the substance use in the film leads to supernatural guidance and control and a complete break-down of any morals someone might have from a loving mother or friends in youth...
it seems obvious that wall street is controlled by satanic forces this way... interesting that McConaughey's character seems so shamanic and New Age... and that even though the director seems to want to mythologize this chanting mantra, it feels hollow... sad to see that the protestant culture has allowed itself to be so corrupted by an obviously satanic culture... but reading the Old Testament one see the same repetition of falling away from God... youth will see this film and think this is the path they must take to "adulthood"... sad no loving heterosexual couples (you know: the ones that reproduce) with true romance ever portrayed by media... very telling.
supernatural influence is implied throughout the film, but in such a way that the message is probably lost under the aegis of being "f'd up" and doing "f'd up" things...
maybe it is Scorcece's directing style, but why so much panache when portraying debauchery and yet no sensitivity about the man's lost path... the film comes off as a bacchanal celebration of "do what thou wilt" pagan idolatry...
inside he is lost and empty, spiritually dead, yet there is no emotional sense for this as if the director cannot come to terms w his own emptiness.