Illuminati Plot History 50-Years in Advance

August 25, 2013


product_thumbnail.php.jpg


The World War Deception, or how the two World Wars
 set the stage for the expansion of the Soviet Union
and the Cold War.



"The two World Wars were an exercise in reducing the number of global power blocs to two."






By Hamad Subani
(henrymakow.com)


In my first post, I mentioned how my persecution at Dalhousie University was triggered by my research into the role of the Soviet Union in the two World Wars. The two World Wars were not historical accidents but cold and calculated undertakings aimed at creating a bipolar New World Order, dominated exclusively by the United States (NATO) and the Soviet Union (Warsaw Pact).

To arrive at this template, it was necessary to destroy the Ottoman Empire, Imperial Russia, Japan, Germany and even the British Empire. The most curious case is the British Empire, which almost like clockwork, started unraveling towards the end of World War II.

In the case of the Indian subcontinent, the British oversaw a violent partition that lead to the creation of two nation states, India (dominated by the Soviet Union) and Pakistan (dominated by NATO). It is interesting to note that nothing on the scale of the partition had occurred between the Hindu and Muslim populations of the Indian subcontinent in hundreds of years prior to the arrival of the British.

Elsewhere, we see similar examples (North and South Korea, North and South Yemen, North and South Vietnam, Communist China and Nationalist Taiwan). In other words, the two World Wars were an exercise in reducing the number of global power blocs to two. And populations of the world were forced to choose between either.

My essay has since then evolved into a book, available for free online reading. In my research spanning several years and more than two hundred different sources, I have come up with some very interesting questions, and some very perplexing answers.

GERMANY MARKED FOR SACRIFICE

Germany, the homeland of the Illuminati, had been earmarked for sacrifice well in advance of World War I.

During World War I in Europe, Germany concentrated its effort on stalemated trench warfare in Western Europe, whereas they could have taken advantage of the confusion prevailing in Russia. But they didn't because Russia had been set aside for the future Bolshevik state.

The stalemate on the Western front also insured that the war did not end until the Bolshevik state had been formed. Towards the end of the war, Germany even formalized a treaty with the Bolsheviks (The Treaty of Rapallo) in which they provided covert assistance to the Soviet military buildup for World War II.

During World War I, Japan received the full support of Britain so that it could inflict humiliating defeats on Imperial Russia. But once the Bolsheviks had consolidated control over Russia, Japan was marked for elimination as a potential impediment to the future Soviet takeover of South East Asia.

Only the United States had the resources to eliminate Japan (a task they gladly performed). The Soviets on the other hand, secured a treaty with Japan since they were in no position to fight the Japanese. While Japanese cities had been thoroughly devastated by B-25 bombers, the populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were spared from such aerial bombings because they were meant to be a sacrificial pyre to the coming bipolar New World Order, in which the fear of nuclear war played an important role in keeping populations allied to their respective blocs.

NAZI GERMANY

The rise of Nazi Germany was like the resurrection of a dummy corporation by Wall Street interests, designed to absorb the debts and liabilities of another "corporation," the Soviet Union.

It was thanks to Hitler's leadership that all of Eastern Europe as well as half of Germany fell to the Soviets. At every stage of the war, we find Germany auto-destructing as they did in World War I.

For example, British forces were stranded at the Dunkirk beach due to a logistical blunder. But they were never taken prisoner by the Nazis, and were allowed to quietly evacuate.

Hitler would advance into the Soviet Union in one of the severest winters. And when the Nazis had Moscow in their scopes, they were ordered to retreat!

Later, Hitler and many high-ranking Nazis disappeared. One of the most interesting case is that of one of Hitler's Generals, Fritz Kraemer.

Conspiracy theorist Mae Brussells claimed that a German namesake in the Pentagon (who oversaw the disastrous Vietnam War, which also resulted in all of Vietnam falling to the Communists) was none other than him.

JEWISH HOLOCAUST

The Jewish Holocaust did happen, and is consistent with the historical hatred the Powers That Be have for Orthodox Judaism. The State of Israel was created to centralize control and leadership of the Jewish people, so that they could be used in dialectical wars against Islamic powers. Sadly, the German people continue to live in a state of denial about their role as high-end-surrogates for undocumented criminal interests.

While things did go exactly according to plan in the West, the New World Order also faced reversals in other parts of the world. The Illuminati briefly lost control of the Soviet Union in the most critical years when Lenin took over. (Trotsky was the Wall Street candidate. Lenin was meant to be an underling.)


However, the disintegration of the Soviet Empire in the nineties was not a failure of this bipolar New World Order.

Rather, the bipolar New World Order had served its purpose. And the time had come to create new blocs based on religious-cultural identity ( Both Albert "Three World Wars" Pike and Samuel "Clash of Civilizations" Huntington would concur).

These new blocs are the West and Israel on one side with the Islamic World (under the leadership of Iran, which is reaping the gains of the War on Terror and the Arab Spring) on the other side.

But since the Islamic World on its own is not strong enough to take on the West, Russia and China have been thrown in as its allies (despite their historical hostility towards Islam).

The wars between these blocs will serve to undermine and discredit the position of revealed religion in human society, as all inflict destruction on all its practitioners, leading to the conquest of human society by the Criminal Elite.
  We are already well into this 50-year plan.

--

Related --- It's all in the long-term blueprint for one-world government. West was plotting Syrian intervention in 2011, according to Wikileaks .
-------    Bahman Nashiri --  Start at 18.25 min -the Master Plan is to create fanatic Islam regimes to initiate world war  Otherwise, Bahman is an admitted Freemason- so read between lines. He says British used MASONRY TO RULE WORLD; elites of invaded countries were initiated. Very true. He says Masonry has changed. I disagree!





Comments for "Illuminati Plot History 50-Years in Advance "

David said (August 26, 2013):

While the articles on your site are usually informative, the recent offering by Hamad Subani, 'Illuminati Plot History: 50 years in advance', is full of historical inaccuracies so as to cast doubt on the author's prowess as a researcher.

For example:
During WW1 Japan inflicted no defeat on Imperial Russia for Japan was an ally of the Triple Entente - Britain, Russia and France. Japan humiliated Imperial Russia in 1905.
The British forces were not stranded on the Dunkirk beaches due to a logistical blunder and then left to quietly evacuate by the Germans. It is true that a halt order was issued by Hitler forbidding the panzers to cross the canal line surrounding the beach head and thus defeat the British before they could evacuate, and it is a possibility this was to allow the British to evacuate. But three days later the German attacks by air and land on the beach head resumed and were unremitting, just as the fighting had been that forced the British back to the sea in the first place.

If your goal is to bolster awareness of a developing world order, i.e. the beast (something I believe is the case) it will not be served by such poor scholarship as this.

Incidentally I am working on a Christian treatise that will provide a sound theological basis for what I believe you are seeking to expose.


HS replies:

apan may have had a treaty with Russia but do such treaties matter when it comes to opportunity? For example, Russia had a treaty of non-aggression with Japan in World War II, but immediately after the atomic bombing, they violated it and moved into Manchuria. After World War I, Russia was in a very weak position. And again, my reference is to the Russia AFTER World War I, in which imperial Russia was almost finished. Japan was clearly in a position to make significant gains, and it was only for this reason that an “Allied Intervention” in Russia took place, which involved the Allies building up a presence in Vladivostok.


Jim Perloff said (August 25, 2013):

Also with due respect to the author, I would just comment that Operation Barbarossa began in June 1941, and the unusual harshness of the subsequent winter could not have been foreseen by Hitler or the German High Command.

--

HS replies:

Please see my book with reference to the controversial weather forecasts the Nazis made use of. They shut out professional weathermen and scientists, and instead relied on some occultists.


JG said (August 25, 2013):

With all due respect to the author here I really tend to disagree on his assessment of Lenin and Trotsky.

Trotsky was no more of a "Wall Street Candidate " than Lenin was a misunderstood nationalist.
The Communist led genocide of 10's of millions of Russian farmers and peasants really did happen and you won't be taught that history in your universities either!


JG said (August 25, 2013):

With all due respect to the author here I really tend to disagree on his assessment of Lenin and Trotsky.

Trotsky was no more of a "Wall Street Candidate " than Lenin was a misunderstood nationalist.

The Communist led genocide of 10's of millions of Russian farmers and peasants really did happen and you won't be taught that history in your universities either!


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at