Bad Blood: The Gay Drive to Donate
July 18, 2013
"equality" means everybody has to share
the sexual Russian roulette
of the 'gay lifestyle'.
Canadian Blood Services accepts blood from homosexuals who haven't had sex with men for five years.
How do they confirm the donor is telling the truth?
Hugo Vance believes the gay activist agenda is "to bring heterosexual HIV infection figures on par with the gay population."
by Hugo Vance
(henrymakow.com)
The American Civil LIberties Union (ACLU) is filing lawsuits in strategic states to remove the medical ban on homosexuals donating blood and plasma.
Never mind that just 30 years ago, in the early days of AIDS, thousands of innocent women, children and men died of AIDS from infected blood transfusions. Dozens of medical workers in blood donation centers contracted the disease from contact with contaminated blood.
Gay activists have effectively suppressed the fact that HIV and syphilis has been on the increase among the US male homosexual population.
Comparing 2008 to 2010, the number of new HIV infections among gays increased 12% from 26,700 in 2008 to 29,800 (95% CI: 26,200-33,500) in 2010, with a 22% increase among gays aged 13-24 from 7,200 (95% CI: 6,100-8,300) in 2008 to 8,800 (95% CI: 7,500-10,100) in 2010. Although gays represent about 7% of the male population in the United States, in 2010 homosexuals accounted for 78% of the new HIV infections among males.
SAFE SEX POLITICALLY INCORRECT
Homosexuals are not consistently using 'safe sex' for two reasons.
First, it's "no fun" as I heard one homosexual prostitute put it. Two, homosexual sex thrives on thrills - they get off on extremes and excess.
Homosexual 'cruising' rides on high risk. Is somebody that snorts crystal meth and uses 'poppers' to have anal sex with strangers during 2-3 day binges going to stop to say, 'excuse me, may I see your last HIV test results please?'. or, 'pardon me - hold on while I replace this broken condom'.
Last August in response to the California porn industry shutting down 3 times since 2010 due to syphilis and HIV - despite mandatory weekly STD testing - the AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION announced, "self-policing and testing alone do not work".
"According to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (LADPH), workers in the adult film industry are ten times more likely to be infected with a sexually transmitted disease than members of the population at large." And that's in spite of constant testing. You simply can't sustain a 'risk free' promiscuous sodomite 'lifestyle'.
The power elite's 'Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD)' is handling the publicity campaign. Events, crowds, demonstrations: the usual generation of non-events for media to saturate television, radio and press.
Typically GLAAD portrays Gays as the martyrs - by questioning the safety of their blood donations, we're insulting them, branding them with the 'scarlet letter', burning them at the stake, yada yada...
Watch this short Youtube on the national gay blood drive.
This is typical of Gay social "justice" by which "equality" means everybody has to share the risk of the sexual Russian roulette of the 'gay lifestyle'.
I will be accused of libel for saying this - but there are some at the top of the ACLU and GLAAD whose agenda is to bring heterosexual HIV infection figures on par with the gay population. This is precisely the only way to do that.
How to protect your family and yourself from risking contaminated transfusions in a health emergency? Talk with your local blood banks about donating and having your own blood saved for yourself. Innocent people WILL be infected by this - and that will be suppressed by Media too.
---
Related:
Syphilis epidemic rising in the U.S. and Canada
http://digitaljournal.com/
Porn Industry Shuts Down
First Comment from Dan:
Syphilis rarely sneaks through screening for blood transfusions.
HIV testing on the other hand isn't as conclusion and carries risk of infection though blood transfusion. All medical agencies dealing with HIV know that tests and 'safe sex' aren't failsafe. The Aids Healthcare Foundation has said that "self-policing and testing alone do not work".
Ask any city clinic nurse, especially in ER's that people leading sex addict lives with many contacts per week don't just increase risk of STD's but a host of other diseases. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/hcai-iamss/tti-it/ttdi-eng.php
I just donated blood last Sunday. There's a lot more than sex history to be disqualified. There are several other risk factor questions. The point is that the ban on 'gay blood' is in no way based upon bigotry. Nobody in the medical community dares confront GLAAD to say, "are you calling us bigots and liars?"
That's just not the case. Anyone alive in the 80's knows a lot of innocent people including nurses and blood lab techs died of AIDS from contact with infected blood.
Before AIDS, medical and dental personnel didn't even have to wear rubber gloves.
Public health standards can't be dictated for long by fantasies.
It's going to get ugly. Look at this gay propaganda.
We have to risk our lives so they can "feel equal."
Steven said (July 19, 2013):
The real issue here apart from the true criminality of homosexuality is the donation and use of a real or potentially infectious bodily fluid and putting that fluid into a heterosexual person who is not or may not be infected by any dangerous pathogen. Gay blood must be considered a real or potential bioweapon and its use against heterosexuals ought to be considered genocide under Article 2 parts b and c.
If the genocide convention was intended to protect criminals and perverts it is clear that it needs to be amended or repealed.
Steven
Article 2
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
·
(a) Killing members of the group;
· (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
· (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
· (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
· (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.