Robert said (June 25, 2013):

Henry, I know that you think Alex is a controlled opposition. Whether he is or isn't I can't say for certain. But I will say this much in AJ's defense he has done his viewers here in the US and around the world a great service by providing and sharing information that the major media ignores or discounts.

Much of info is exclusive to his site. The people need to know this so they are prepared. He has repeatedly warned us of Martial law FEMA camps and planned genocide. He has warned us of the dangers of vaccines, pharma drugs and GMOs in conjunction with Mike Adams and he has offered the public all this valuable info from one site.

Are AJ's conspiracy theories perfect? Of course not. To his detriment he plays down the Zionist component though he does cryptically refer to it through code words like neo-Trotskyites, globalists, internationalists. If you are knowledgable you can easily figure out who he really is talking about. Let's be honest if AJ ever came out and pinned the true culprits in such open terms as you, Bro Nathanael and David Duke do he would be off the air in a minute. To get a full perspective you have to go to a number of different sues yours included. If A J is a controlled opposition he has hurt them severely. Even if Alex is giving an incomplete view of things he has presented enough info to educate the public that something is seriously wrong with our government. God bless Henry

DAN said (June 19, 2013):

Jim's report on Bohemian Grove is consistent with hundreds of locals who've worked there all along.
They're mostly hotel and restaurant workers from the Bay Area that sign off for the higher pay. They're paid above their industry standard, though many say they have to put up with excessive rudeness from many of the 'elite' attendees.

Alex Jone's famous gate-crashing video of the Grove in 1999 is actually consistent with mainstream accounts of the festivities, like Jim's. . I saw Jone's video way back in 1999. It reminded me of one of Geraldo Rivera's many 'investigative reporting' specials that fizzled. The sexual three ring circus described by MKULTRA survivors probably happened somewhere else. It was standard to lie and confuse victims about location, so that investigators would find no evidence, thus discrediting the victim's credibility. That happened with hundreds of children that testified against NSA Satanist Col. Aquino.

It's also standard that only a select few are tapped for the 'after-party' in any elite enclave: DC, New York, LA, Vancouver, etc. The secret parties are also like Chinese boxes - one level leads to another.

Ray said (June 19, 2013):

MO the Red Ox is a poisoned well! By his "fantastic" description, to tally loony he's poisoning the well, for the real & not loony information, which will be discredited and linked to his raving!

Just like any disinformation. Linking the sighting of Elvis to the 911 conspiracy!

Tony B said (June 18, 2013):

Henry, I see at least parts of this "Red Ox" statement itself as mind control. Some is "old news" and some just doesn't fit. Appears to mix items and personalities into a "guilt by association" package with innuendos that don't all ring true.
--

Red Ox replies:

It is not unexpected that someone telling a difficult truth from 20 years ago about one of the most important events for the most important people in the world would be treated with skepticism.

Let us hope you apply the same instinct to disbelief to all of those BBC and CNN reports, your newspaper, your country's commentators, entertainers and pop stars, all of whom act out the agenda. It is those people who emotionally manipulate the common man 24/7 and get paid for it . Should we start with THEM? You sure it is ME who is reacting to manipulation? I think your instinctive reaction is wrong, and we both know about the agenda, so it's a bit more subtle than YOU THINK it is. You have decades of programming to deal with. You genuinely do think this is supicious emotionally, because you are emotionally manipulated.

Jim said (June 18, 2013):

Okay Henry, I've actually been there. I worked as a valet , hired on last notice as a fill in in 1981 or so during what they call the Low Jinx, later in the summer they have a longer stay called the High Jinx.

I can tell you that I was free to roam around with the other help at night, drinking and carrying on with no sign of security or restrictions within the grounds. There were NO CHILDREN there. There were NO WOMEN there. We went into town and saw the bars where the hookers waited for clients from the camp but that was it. The idea of bringing a woman in seemed very unlikely and a child would have been entirely out of place.

FWIW I was a valet in the camp that had once belonged to Jack London. The Grovers in my group were mostly younger and democrats and a real pain to work for, entirely oblivious and inconsiderate. My friend worked at a camp of self made republicans who were much more generous and respectful to the help.

I talked to workers who had been there for many years. The skullduggery was more about gay encounters with the help or picking up a hooker but nothing more. Bottom line is having been there, albeit for 3 brief days long ago, I think this story is such bullshit...

--
Red Ox replies:

With the greatest respect, it seems unlikely a Valet would be told the truth by the leaders of a worldwide satanic cult, I have to tell you honestly!

--

Jim replies:

My reply is that the Grove is divided into camps with maybe 12 or more guests each but with valets as well. There were no badges or security (this was the early 80's) and nowhere I could not go although clearly there were places I didn't belong. There were many hired help and there were no security checks made. There were also many guests among the campers. I was told it was a place where business was never conducted, only introductions and plans to get together.

Could there have been a secret entrance where children were smuggled in and kept from the vast majority? Maybe but I doubt it. Personally I don't doubt that some of the members engage in some of these act; I just don't think it occurs at the Grove. I would imagine events of this type to more likely occur at remote locations with long term carefully selected staff and more select and exclusive guest lists.

For example while I was there they have a full popular big band, Les Brown and His Band of Renown as campers. Now the leader aside there are 12-16 lowly working musicians in that band staying as guests, far from the kind of powerful people you would imagine to be privy to rituals involving children. So while I think they are dark and rotten to the core I just can't believe that the Grove is where the nasty stuff happens based on my stay there and talks with a friend who worked both Jinx as a valet for many years. Too many guests, too many workers, not enough security , at least back then.

Peter said (June 18, 2013):

Trust, belief and should are words used for dealing with children, not those who objectively assume their maturity.

Reading texts by believers one finds that they are loaded with the seeds of evil simply because they depend psychologically on remaining in a state of continual neotony.

From a spiritual atheist, Peter Trainin.

Andrew said (June 18, 2013):

Perennial teacher Norman Livergood shares some good information & sheds some light & insight on his website www.hermes-press.com with regards to esoteric chritianity & how it went underground and what it passes today as is a form of pseudochristianity or version suitable & palatable to the tastes of rulers like Constantine & King James.

Marcos said (June 18, 2013):

The web of occult activities in movies, music, politics, has but one objective: turn people into Luciferian religion, even if they can't realize it.

See the case of David Icke. Superficially, he says a lot of truth. Behind the curtains, he follows Alice Bailey's Theosophy (Luciferianism) to the letter.

I suggest people watch this very detailed and interesting exposé about Icke in Youtube:
http://youtu.be/vjia7ntPfLE

Matt said (June 18, 2013):

Hi Henry, this KJV article is the most ridiculous since the Beatles not writing the Beatles article. The KJV was the latest and greatest versions that built up over the course of the 16th century.

I'd like to see John Hamer's evidence -based on what? The KJV reaffirms a pristine Protestant Christian faith, and condemns the occult. The KJV has the canonical set 66 books of the bible, set by the early church. It was limited by 17th century scholarship, but based on the Textus Receptus that was close to the majority texts, but far from the corrupted Gnostic texts used in the modern versions, such as the Textus Siniaticus, Vaticanus, Alexandria, etc, which have watered down on teachings of the Divinity of Christ. The KJV survived throughout the Protestant world for centuries, and was admired by its scholarship, potency, and poetic beauty