Direct Link to Latest News

 

Is China Part of the New World Order?

February 16, 2013

zhaolagarde.jpg(Left: Money Power banksters Zhao Xiaochuan and Lagarde preparing World Currency)


The US Empire is not the Money Power. China's rise and
opposition to the US fits the familiar pattern: the Money Power's
proxies working towards managed conflict and World Government.






by Anthony Migchels
(henrymakow.com)


To many it is unclear whether China is incorporated in the New World Order or a real competitor to Anglo-American Imperialism. 

There is little doubt that the Money Power co-opted the leadership of the Land of the Dragon a long time ago.

History shows that the Money Power has several tools to motivate peoples in the right direction. Their fingerprints are all over China.

In his excellent analysis of the power brokers in China, St. John Bartholomew reminds us that Marxism is a Money Power operation and that Mao did their bidding. Mao was apparently educated at Yale's department in China. Yale's Skull and Bones were very active in Asia and Mao was probably a member. Most American diplomats sent to him were so too.

According to Bartholomew, the triads, China's mafia-style secret societies, were built up by Masons to combat the Qing dynasty that ruled China until the 19th century and resisted the Opium the British needed to sell to China because they had nothing else to exchange for its vast riches.

The membership list of the Trilateral Commission, the Rockefeller confab similar to the Atlantic Bilderbergers, is littered with Chinese names.

zhou-en-lai.jpg(left, Zhou-en-lai & Henry whutz-his-name discuss how China will supplant the USA over dim sum) )

MONEY SUPPLY

Another indicator is China's money supply. The Chinese Government officially owns the money supply. It is not entirely clear where the interest goes.
However, the Government is under control of the Money Power, so the added value, which is the essence, goes to them. It serves their purpose. The Government also can (and does) create the boom bust cycle the Money Power wants. The Emperors printed debt-free cash.

The Chinese are moving to back the Yuan by Gold, clearly promoting the Money Power's nascent Gold Standard. Meanwhile, its Central Bank President, Zhao Xiaochuan, who is a member of the Group of 30, the Rockefeller-sponsored group of leading Central Bankers and academics, is calling for World Currency. As we have seen, opposition against the dollar is not the same thing as opposition against the Money Power.

China is a loyal member of all the international governance organizations.

Furthermore, over the last decades the Money Power has migrated a substantial part of its manufacturing base from Europe and particularly the US to China. Can there be any doubt that they would be very, very sure that that crucial strategic asset would be absolutely safe there?

CHINA'S RISE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

The build up of China must be seen in light of the decades-old program of the de-industrialization of the West, particularly America. What has been given to China, was taken from elsewhere.

Also, this build up is actually a typical M.O.: think of how US technology and money built up the USSR to create a credible 'threat' in the Cold War. Saddam Hussein is another example: he was made strong to be taken down later as part of the strategy to conquer the Middle East. Or Iran, which is bolstered by often Western/Israeli technology that is transferred via China.

China's rise comes with many dangers. Chinese nationalism is primitive and easily inflamed. Beijing is under incredible pressure internally and happily uses external 'foes' to export these pressures. The latest rows with Japan over some trivial islands are a case in point.

Just like the Money Power conducted the European Orchestra during the 19th century, it now directs a Multi-Polar World.

We know how it all ended in Europe: tightly knit alliances facing each other with ever more paranoia, unable to extricate themselves from the trap. One assassination was enough to light the fuse.

The same can be seen today, with NATO facing the Shanghai Cooperation Organization of Russia and China, with Pakistan and Iran as close associates.

CONCLUSION

China is being built up in a very typical fashion. All the pointers that we have come to recognize are there: usurious control of the money supply, Capitalism, Marxism, 'secret' societies, China towing the internationalist line.

The US Empire is not the Money Power. China's rise and opposition to the US fits the familiar pattern: the Money Power's proxies working towards managed conflict and World Government.

Anthony Migchels is an Interest-Free Currency activist and founder of the Gelre, the first Regional Currency in the Netherlands. You can read all of his articles on his blog Real Currencies

Related:

Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati (Bartholomew)

The US Empire is not the Money Power!

Bloomberg, the dying Fed and the birth pangs of the new Gold Standard
---
First Comment from Dan:


Great reminder by Anthony Migchels not to forget that the only countries NOT in the NWO are listed on the US State Department' or IMF shit-list, and China isn't one of them.

Explaining the history and place of China in the New Order is beyond the scope of a comment here.  Suffice to say that the 'rise' of China since 1974 has indeed been entirely due to massive support from the Globalist synarchy.  I can't even broach the involvement of Sino-Soviet relations during the Mao/Stalin/Khrushchev era.  The best place to begin to understand China's current position at the table is the early 70's, with Henry Kissinger's secret trips to China after the peak of the Vietnam War.

Kissinger's private message to the Chinese Communists was congratulations, they'd won a place at the Globalist's table - let's deal. Kissinger offered the long-term business plan to prop China up as future successor to the American role as manufacturer for the world, and global "Policeman".  The whole deal was laid out back then between Kissinger and Chou en Lai.  Imperceptibly during the 90's while American's partied, Capitol Hill revised General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). GATT had been around since 1948 but kicked in at the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995.

This is when whole industrial regions of factories in the American Midwest began to vanish, physically dismantled and shipped to China.  I hope all readers know the rest.of the story.   China's role in the New Global Order isn't secret, except that land of make believe, mainstream news.   The real story is on NWO organisation websites, like this one, the WTO.

"China's role in the new global order"
http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news11_e/igo_10nov11_e.htm

Review on China by Henry Kissinger

http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1884/article_detail.asp



Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Is China Part of the New World Order? "

JC said (February 17, 2013):

I think I'm beginning to see a pattern.

"The Chinese are moving to back the Yuan by Gold, clearly promoting the Money Power's nascent Gold Standard. Meanwhile, its Central Bank President, Zhao Xiaochuan, who is a member of the Group of 30, the Rockefeller-sponsored group of leading Central Bankers and academics, is calling for World Currency. As we have seen, opposition against the dollar is not the same thing as opposition against the Money Power."

Michel Camdessus, French economist and former Managing Director of the IMF, in 2011 becomes the new leader of the Palais-Royal group, calls for the creation of a supranational banking power, outside the control of any government, which would issue the global reserve currency in the form of SDRs.

Cardinal Peter Turkson, president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace calls for a supranational banking authority identical to the one recommended by the Palais-Royal group. Michel Camdessus is on the list of advisors to the Council.


Peter said (February 17, 2013):

I feel you will get a truer version of the populist competitor Migchels alludes to in his first sentence in that Asia Times article in that link.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/OA12Ad04.html

Concluding a complex history, that comprador class has returned to China in a big way, the thrust of Migchel's article displays this. However, within the massive landmass that is China is an equally massive population that will always mistrust that pro Western comprador class. Something that should always be kept in mind.


James said (February 17, 2013):

It could be like Migchels says, but he has zero evidence. He is just talking. It's a mere suspicion. It could also be that the Chinese have truly separated themselves from their former British overlords. There is proof for neither scenario.

Chances are that he is wrong. Because former slaves or underlings who become strong always want to distance themselves from their former bosses and have a strong desire to be recognized on their own strength. Old attachments count little for new power drunk leaders.

But we will probably never find out the truth. Even a war with billions of people killed could be interpreted as planned by the British money gangsters, with the result explained as good stewardship of the planet and its limited resources. See Georgia Guidestones.

However, I doubt that the Chinese would be accomplices to the eradication of most of their countrymen. This confrontation could also be real, good old competition for survival, like when the Neanderthals met the Cro-Magnons. Just offering this as alternative, without claiming it as the only truth.

Besides, it is very questionable that the Chinese or the London money changers want a true gold standard. That would cut their powers too much, and because of that it would never happen. At most a fake gold standard that looks like the real thing, i.e. another con.

They have conquered the world with paper money and hold on to it via paper money. Doubtful that they would sacrifice that. Too much good competition would come up soon under a regime of honest money, and the parasites would actually have to start working to compete. No more ruling. Ridiculous thought, that they would do this voluntarily.


Gene said (February 17, 2013):

No, China is not part of the New/Jew World Order (NWO) and these are just a few basic clues.

1. Judaism is not an approved religion in China. Christianity and Buddhism are along with Confucism (sp). Christianity enjoys more freedom in China than in the USA. Christianity is the fastest growing religion in the world because of China.

2. China does not have a Communist government. It is totalitarian, but not Communistic. The government owned factories have been closed for at least 15-years. They have one political party just like the USA, but in the USA, the one party has two different names. Under Mao’s/NWO control, there was mass starvation in China and there is not now.

3. The NWO wants severe population reduction. China has stopped enforcing their Mao rule of one child per couple.

4. In NWO countries like the USA, eminent domain lets the government seize as it pleases. In China, they will build roads around people that do not want to sell as illustrated by numerous humorous pictures on the net reflecting this tendency.

5. The Chinese are not developing a world conquering, aggressive military. Most of their development concentrates on developing defense against the NWO’s pit bull, the USA/NATO.

6. China has a government owned central bank which the Jews, if they were in control, would not tolerate.

Although the initial NWO plan was for China to be their next conquest after the USA, free enterprise began developing in 1978 in secret farming agreements which lead to the downfall of Maoism and China stepping off the bankster’s plantation just before the massing of USSR troops on the Chinese border in 1987. This was the NWO trying to intimidate China back on to the plantation. It did not work.

Yes, manufacturing was planned and started by the NWO to move to China. It continued even after China stepped off of the bankster’s plantation because a “good deal” just cannot be resisted by the money junkies. Greed is a supreme force for the money junkies.

With Putin pulling Russia off the bankster’s plantation starting in 2001 and basically nationalizing their central bank in 2012, the NWO had much more global control in 1985 than they do now. The NWO’s planned empire is collapsing and we are currently witnessing the greedy money junkies beginning to eat one another. When things are going as planned, they work together. When things aren’t, there is no honor among thieves.

The Chinese have simply out Jewed the Jews. The Chinese tell the NWO what they want to hear while patiently doing what is necessary to erode the monetary base of the NWO. The economic war has been going one for over 20-years and the Chinese have almost won. Now all they have to do is patiently watch the NWO consume itself.


Justin said (February 17, 2013):

To Henry first , your latest article about China is very interesting, i will add a further piece to the puzzle, about 5-6 years ago, there was a main steam news article here, it said that the Rothschild had come to renegotiate with the Chinese government about taking their 49% share of the central bank here to 51%, they went home without succeeding, so it was written.

I recently got this book, by Misha Glenny ,McMafia, A Journey Through the Global Criminal Underworld (Knopf, 2008) , it is an eye opene. I recommend it you all for many reasons, you will understand, when you read it. The author also issues a brief and clear understanding of politics and politicians in the first part of the book, basically that the grey and black worlds of finance, economics, money etc are part of a politicians gambit and constituency.


Johnny said (February 17, 2013):

kissinger and gang have been telling us about this since the late 60's early 70's.

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=china+slated+to+be+the+next+nwo+leader&ei=UTF-8&fr=moz35

it muscled up when the hard drive mysteriously disappeared back in 94-95.

ive been silent for a while, and have been visiting your site for some yrs now, you have many good articles and for the most part are right on the mark...thanks.


Debra said (February 17, 2013):

China was one of the founding members of the United Nations. China plays a large part in the global agenda associated with Agenda 21 and
a reduction of one-third of the global population. Referred to as "sustainable development", the code name for death / a more
prison-like reality. The few who do remain will be the micro-chipped slaves having lost all of their humanity forever.

The Two Witnesses:-
http://jahtruth.net/horse.htm


Brian said (February 17, 2013):

In keeping with one of Anthony's related articles, I've been saying for years that 2013 would be the year that the Federal Reserve System will have served its purpose and be relegated to the dustbin of history, as it marks the 100th year since its inception.

Apparently there is some occult significance for 100 years to be its lifespan before moving to the next system in the plan for a one-world currency and government. Although it's interesting to note that starting in 1913 there also seems to be monetary-related events orchestrated by the money power approximately every 20 years to now.

Maybe Anthony can elaborate on these 20-year intervals, but 1933 of course marked the beginning of the end (at least for the time being) of a gold standard. I'm not sure of what event may have occurred in 1953. 1973 was around the time of the Breton Woods Conference that in my understanding put the final nail in the coffin of any semblance of a gold standard regulatory system (where Nixon was a thorn in the side of the money power and had to be forced to leave the stage - presto chango, Watergate.) 1993 I'm also unaware of. And now 2013 with the scheduled end of the Fed to be replaced by, wait for it, the resurrection of a gold standard!

Talk about what goes around comes around.

Use - Abuse - Refuse. Classic m.o. of the Illuminati Jews.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at