Illuminati Strategy - "Inventing Danger"

April 16, 2013

boston.jpg After the Boston Marathon "terror" attack Monday, I repost this timely 2002 reminder that the Israeli government attacked and killed Israelis in "terror attacks" designed to create the appearance of an external enemy, and justify aggression. This strategy is being pursued in the US today to create a climate of fear leading to a police state. Illuminati Zionists control DHS,  Here is Bro Nate's latest word on Boston marathon . They are using this strategy of "covert aggression" to portray Christians and patriots as a danger to society.

Bomber caught on camera?   who needs a rucksack that size?

By Henry Makow Ph.D.
(Originally, "The Zionist Roots of the War on Terror"
Nov 18,2002)

Until recently, I accepted Israel's self-image as a beleaguered, peace-loving nation in a sea of bloodthirsty Arabs. The idea that this tiny state had imperialist designs seemed ludicrous.

But what if, unknown to most people, including Israelis, the world's power elite was using Israel to advance their plan for New World Order?

What if Israel's role were to colonize the Middle East, and to become the seat of the World Government & Religion?

"Israel's Sacred Terrorism" (1980) by Livia Rokach, a 63-page on line monograph suggests that this bizarre scenario may not be so preposterous.

Rokach's monograph is based on revelations from the personal diary of Moshe Sharett, who was Israeli's first Foreign Minister from 1948-1956, and Prime Minister from 1954-1956.

According to this diary, which the Israelis tried to suppress, Israel's image of vulnerability was a ruse. Israel has always planned to become the dominant power in the region, and "invented dangers" in order to dupe its citizens and provoke wars.

Moshe Sharett

In his diary, Sharett quotes a conversation with Army Chief of Staff Moshe Dayan in May 1955:

"We face no danger at all of an Arab advantage of force for the next 8-10 years...Reprisal actions which we couldn't carry out if we were tied to a security pact are our vital lymph...they make it possible for us to maintain a high level of tension in our population and in the army. Without these actions we would have ceased to be a combative people... "

Sharett concludes: "The state.... must see the sword as the main if not the only, instrument with which to keep its morale high and to retain its moral tension. Toward this end it may -- no it MUST -- invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the method of provocation and revenge.... And above all, let us hope for a new war with the Arab countries so that we may finally get rid of our troubles and acquire our space." (41, emphasis mine)


This policy of "reprisals" or "provocation and revenge" was also called "covert aggression." The U.S. "war on terror" is a continuation of it. Essentially it involves disguising a policy of aggression as retaliation for sham provocations.

For example, Israeli patrols would cross the border to attack Jordanians or Egyptians, and then claim the actions took place in Israel. Once attacked, the army pursued the "aggressors" into enemy territory and wreaked havoc. Ariel Sharon was the leader of a squad ("Unit 101") that specialized in these murderous forays. His 1953 raid on the Jordanian village of Kibiyah killed dozens of civilians. (30)

In March 1954, an Israeli bus travelling between Eilat and Beersheba was attacked and 10 passengers were killed. The UN armistice Commissioner, a Col. Henderson said, "from the testimonies of the survivors, it is not proved that all the murderers were Arabs." He attributed the attack to "terrorists intent on increasing the tensions in the area." (28) Thereupon the Israelis left the Armistice Commission in protest.

In June-July 1954 an Israeli terrorist squad blew up many British and American institutions in Cairo in an attempt to sour relations between the Arabs and the West. Dubbed the "Lavon Affair," possibly this was a precursor to the attack on the World Trade Centre.

From the point of view of "covert aggression", if terrorism didn't exist, Israel would have to create it. In some instances, the terrorists are described as "white." Remember the sniper who killed 10 Israeli reservists at a checkpoint? If he were Arab, wouldn't he have struck again?

Israeli commentators lament that Israel is not a democracy. They say its security establishment has hijacked the country. One pundit remarked, "Israel is not a state with an army, but an army with an affiliated state." They also lament that a culture of corruption, brutality and immorality pervades the army. See Ran Ha-Cohen, "Israeli Elections. So What"

I believe the Illuminati controls Israel's security establishment.


The world's wealthiest families have more in common with each other than they do with humanity. From their perspective, we are "useless eaters." In the guise of "globalism," they plan to increase and consolidate their wealth and power, and reduce everyone else's.

The heart of the Illuminati's power is the banking and oil cartels, (Rothschild, Rockefeller) but it includes many interlocking cartels like media, pharmaceuticals, defence, illegal drugs and prostitution. It operates through the world's intelligence agencies, and groups like the Council on Foreign relations, which grooms all US leaders.

Esoterically, the Illuminati is a secret society within another secret society, the Freemasons who are dedicated to sacrificing mankind to Lucifer.

All of this sounds fantastic because it is kept out of the media and education systems, which are mental caretakers in an invisible asylum.

Recently, Americans have been recruited to do the grunt work of subjugating Islam. This is not the first time the Illuminati has used the U.S. in this fashion. America was embroiled in World War One to free a million British soldiers to conquer Palestine for the Zionists. In the Second World War, the U.S. saved Communist Russia's bacon. Both Communism and Zionism are creations and instruments of the central bankers.


The Illuminati has always used anti Semitism to trick Jews into advancing its nefarious goals.

In the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" the speaker confesses the illuminati has "wiped out every kind of rule except our own." Nevertheless it allows attacks on its plan for world domination in order to create anti Semitism. "Anti Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren." (9-2)

From childhood Jews are taught that they are disliked for no rational reason and Israel is insurance against another holocaust. This attitude dehumanizes their opponents and obviates the need for genuine self-criticism. Often the question is not, is something true or false? Right or wrong? But, "Is it good for the Jews?"

Traumatizing people and convincing them that irrational fiends threaten their survival is an effective form of mind control. Such people will throw morality and reason to the wind and, if necessary, become savage, mindless killers themselves. They are easily exploited by forces that may not be Jewish at all, that may be anti Semitic, and plot their destruction.

Now the Illuminati is using the same tactic on Americans. The Mossad's fingerprints are all over 9-11. Apparently, Israel's Zim Container Lines moved their 200-man office out of the WTC the week before and no Israelis died in the attack. Seven of the supposed Arab "hijackers" seem to be alive.

If Osama bin Laden didn't exist, the United States and Britain would have created him. Osama may be genuine but there is evidence that he has received money from the British MI-6 as recently as 1996. According to the French daily Le Figaro, Bin Laden met with the CIA station chief in Dubai in July 2001. He serves the purpose of those inciting a bogus "clash of civilizations."

In the domestic sphere, the persecution of Jews has become a cultural paradigm. Lately, women and gays are the Jews, taught they're oppressed by heterosexuality, and homosexuality is normal. . Millions of lives are being ruined. The Illuminati's hidden agenda is to destroy society's immune system (its ability to resist totalitarianism) by attacking its red blood cell, the nuclear family.

In conclusion, "covert aggression" is the primary means by which the Illuminati enacts its long-term plan. Americans have been incited to become oppressors by a phoney Muslim threat. Unaware of what's done in their name, Americans are now like Jews asking, "Why do they hate us?" 


See also Makow - "The Zionist Protection Racket"

Alex Jones - Proof Boston Marathon was a False Flag 


First Comment by Dan

Astute people can tell the difference between 'real' terrorism and State terrorism.  Unfortunately there's aren't as many astute people as there were before 911. 

The latest one in Boston consisted of bombs placed in sidewalk trash cans. (NBC is calling them 'backpack bombs').   So what's the point of bombing ordinary people. Nobody has taken credit for it, or made demands or even used the 15 minutes of fame to make a statement.  When bombing is pointless and the explanations are left to the authorities and media, it's State terrorism.    For example  Bloomberg news says, "This is very likely a terrorist attack."

And other MSM outlets speculate on 'Saudi suspects'.   But this is nothing but hot air. 

They've unreported that the Boston Bomb squad was running a "controlled explosion drill"  Such drills have been done through an FBI program under Homeland Security for years.

Boston Marathon Bombing happened on Same Day as "Controlled Explosion" Drill by Boston Bomb Squad

I tend to think it's lame racket like "The Boy Who Cried Wolf".  They overused it after 911 until people didn't buy in when they pulled "7/7".  Osama seemed to obligingly blow something every time Bush or Blair's credibility ratings went down. 

The Obama Administration just launched it "Austerity" budget on the floor of Congress just before this happened.  The nation should be hearing Obama explain "the death of 1000 cuts" he wants to deploy on Americans.  Instead, we get to hear him beat George Bush's old war on terror drum.

"Barack Obama has promised that those responsible for the attacks in Boston would "feel the full weight of justice" as he ordered the FBI to lead the hunt for the bombers." 

Always look for who benefits.   The only beneficiary of this are those who will vote FOR Austerity budget cuts.  The cuts are world wide, they are nothing but a way to transfer more public resources to the Globalist banks.  Don't forget that's what's really going on.   Bombings and shootings are merely distractions from that in America.
Also a way to 'tighten security' so that people won't protest.  It's a bully move.

Comments for "Illuminati Strategy - "Inventing Danger" "

Steven said (April 17, 2013):

The Saudi man was one of the wounded and authorities found no evidence that he did anything wrong.

He was just at the wrong place at the wrong time just like any one else. My best guess is that government agents did the Boston bombings just like the 911 attack and the rest of the terror attacks. The question is which government of what country?

I suspect it is a nation that has the least respect and love for gentiles and wants a police state and can operate in America with out attracting attention to itself. Now who might that be

Richard said (April 17, 2013):

Have you ever seen Terry Gilliam's 1985 movie "Brazil" ? It was a surreal black comedy based on Orwell's 1984. But it has an element not in 1984........constant bombings of civilians by mythical 'terrorists'.

If it's been a while, you probably know it was predictive programming, but I just watched it again and it is a must see. It was prophetic. Like other Gilliam movies. (Gilliam is of course as Illuminati as Stanley Kubrick).

If you download free torrents for computer it's available from by googling 'brazil + terry gilliam + pirate bay'. Or use your usual video rental channels.

The movie vanished from public awareness after 911 of course. It was pulled from TV re-runs since 2000.

The opening scene is a bombing in shopping mall. Then the TV talking head asks the Ministry of Information Chairman 'Helpman' , "What do you believe is behind this recent increase in Terrorist bombings?"

Helpman: (who looks like Maurice Strong) "Bad sportsmanship. A ruthless minority of people who just can stand seeing the other fellow win. If these people would have just played the game, they'd get a lot more out of life."

Brian said (April 17, 2013):

Greetings from the People's Republic of Massachusetts!

It seems to me that this latest false flag event was long overdue and inevitable. The psychopaths-in-charge have long memories, and in this case you have to go back 238 years for them to exact some form of revenge.

This 2nd "Boston Massacre" occured on this unique day we call "Patriot's Day", whose official sanctum as a holiday exists in only one county (Middlesex) in the entire State. As many know, it commemorates the recognized beginning of the American Revolution with the skirmish at Lexington and Concord.

The intent of Rothschild-backed England was to incite the Colonials into a war whose victory was seen as being a foregone conclusion that would mean the installation of a NWO - 18th Century style. But something unthinkable happened along the way to the 'invincible' British Army, and they were defeated by this "American rabble".

They never forgot, and now this latest chapter in what has ever since been the attempt to bring down this country, has hit home to where the 'thorn in their side' started.

Tragic of course, but a lame attempt nonetheless in what is increasingly looking like the fizzling out of their "Great Work of Ages".

We'll see just how far they get before they're defeated for good this time.

This was obviously a continuation of the assault on the 2nd Amendment. Ironically in response to the Battle of Lexington and Concord, known as "the shot heard 'round the World". This being an attempt to 'stifle shots fired for freedom' by disarming us.

And who was this particular marathon in honor of? The people of Newtown, CT., many of whom were actually at the finish line when the explosions occured.

Cruel bastards.

JV said (April 17, 2013):

What an excellent article ; it's all there in a nutshell.

I have expressed before concerns about nomenclature of political discussions, re Wittgenstein.

I don't like web sites like "Real Jew News" that use the moniker "the Jews", as if all Jews are in the same bag, or as if just being a Jew is is being part of a greater Jewish conspiracy. This website does excellent work in informing people, but 'sloppy use of semantics' often leads to bad things down the road. 'Muddy terminology leads to muddy thinking'; 'Garbage in, garbage out.'

Re 'careful selection of terminology', as said, the use of the term 'illuminati' bugged me because it trips on the use of the self-preferred term of aggressors, by the defenders. Homosexuals, more accurately, descriptively, 'anus fuckers' (can't get more anti-life than that) knew they had to 're-brand', and so termed the term 'gay', and now if you don't use THEIR word for themselves, you are considered 'homophobic'.

The 'illuminati' , 'illumined ones', 'higher spiritual beings sent to earth to save us from ourselves' is a term satanists have dressed up in to fool most free masons and Jews and all the rest. The propaganda value of 'mind associations' in the human brain means that if you associate crap with ice cream by calling it ice cream long enough, they will begin to accept crap. If you call a nest psychopaths 'the Royal House' long enough, they begin to smell like England for the average brain of the average Englishman, and riches provide the proof of 'success' to illuminate these psychopathic upper castes.

But, having said all that, I have no better terminology to name the 'illuminati zionists'; however, I mention all this only to hope that the various web sites who take on the zionist illuminati come together in choosing a common analytical term that is not ethnic and not a term the illuminati use to describe themselves.

Re your description of the intermarriage between the Jewish rich and the British nasal Norman Empire-experts ruling caste, similar patterns of intermarriage existed many places over many centuries, and so as Sand, Atzmon, Koestler and others, the 'ethnic' identity nuances and realities and the term 'Jew' leads to built-in semantic inaccuracies.

Most 'ethnic identities' are relatively modern patched up constructs made up to serve the advent of the 'nation state' about 300 years ago. The German-speaking state-lets were a bit late out the starting gate (1870) and so manifested a high philosophical culture, until, with 'the new nationalism', imposed, hit the shoals of WW 1 and 2.

Robert said (April 17, 2013):

Inventing Distraction

I had been thinking about the same aspect of the Boston attack that Dan mentioned, "terror" as distraction. Gone from the headlines and from people's minds are the growing discontent and simmering resentments with Washington as the economy heads south, any stormclouds brewing over recent scandals, and Washington's daily shenanigans. Here we go again with temporary solidarity, patriotism, and the feeling that government officials are on our side, while they continue to screw us and move the agenda forward.

Peter said (April 17, 2013):

With regard to the actions of the zionists/illuminati - capt Archibald Maule Ramsay wrote a book about this ( attached) in 1952, called 'The Nameless War' - For me, reading this book was most illuminating - if you'll pardon the pun - It explained the underlying driving force behind the great
revolutions in history and his chapter 'Development of Revolutional Technique' explains what has happenned in Lybia and is now taking place in Syria. The book is available free, on-line :

In spite of his position as a prominent MP in the U.K. government, he was imprisoned for the
whole of the period of WWII to prevent his communication with the British public - many of
whom supported Hitler's fight against jewish Bolshevism.

Thank you for your website - I now never read the establishment press - it has taken me 50 years to realise that it is just propaganda !!

K said (April 17, 2013):

My bet is that the ‘government’ (FBI, BATF, etc.) already know who set off the Boston bombs. The perpetrator will be a white male patsy that has the proper profile and was coached throughout the plan, leaving bread crumbs that law enforcement will follow to his arrest. As always ask “Cui bono”; as only the police state benefits.

Thanks K

Another "tell" is that no one in government is ever held resposnsible for allowing these "terrorist" attacks to occur. If 9-11 had been anything but an inside job, heads would have rolled.


JG said (April 16, 2013):

The Boston bombings, who will the culprits be? Along with gun confiscation the true American Patriots are next on the "hit list" of Homeland Security. My guess is the culprit or culprits of this tragedy will be young white males belonging to an underground anti-government organization. The vulnerable American Public will eat this up "hookline and sinker".

Brian said (April 16, 2013):

Check today's Toronto Star's sports section, 1st page. Some wag proclaims that people gathering in crowds now at risk. Well, well, maybe that's the point of the bombing: scare tactics. People can't very well gather to organize for change if they fear they'll be blown up, can they?

The perp, of course, was 'thought to be' a Saudi. Sirhan Sirhan comes to mind although he was a Palestinian, I believe. All the same props are in evidence such as the "drill" being conducted and bomb sniffing dogs. A drill for London's bombing, the FEMA people being at the WTC the day before.......all the same threads....but will people notice? Many do. A guy at the coffee shop cottoned onto the drill piece......

What to do, what to do. Things are certainly accelerating - on all fronts. Like the game is in "overtime."

Meanwhile, keep doing what you're doing.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at