RC said (May 30, 2023):

Jesus apparently met that Egregor
Mathhew 4

"Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. 9 “All this I will give you,” he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.”
10 Jesus said to him, “Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.

I would also like to add information about the Khmelnytsky uprising. Khmelnytsky was of Polish descent and he was educated in Jesuit College in Lviv. His main opponents - Polish king John II Casimir Vasa was a member of Jesuit Order himself and his military commander Jeremi Wiśniowiecki was of Rurik origin and also was educated in Jesuit College of Lviv.

Another hidden fact. Father of John II Casmir, king of Sweden and Poland Sigismund III Vasa was raised by Jesuits and he installed the Romanov dynasty in Moscow in 1610-12. Michael Romanov's father Filaret spent several years in Malbork castle with Jesuits and was sending orders to the new tsar.

I was also recently told that Putin (if it comes to NWO) really changed from Saul to Paul. But he also has some very dark past himself.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/alexander-litvinenko-murdered-because-he-accused-putin-of-being-a-paedophile-a6824806.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nd2Z3nXnLD0

BG said (May 30, 2023):

...I think you know how Levite priests create the strong egregore,....HOMOSEXUALITY

--
Basically, the white American race is the BITCH egregore of the Jewish dynastic Egregore.

the slave egregore, the white egregore hive mind ONLY exists to do the bidding of the Jewish dynastic egregore.

All highly advanced civilizations have been ruled by dynastic egregores. They had to bomb the entire nation of Korea because the mayor of every city was a member of ruling egregore, the ruling dynasty that had been ruling for 2000 years.

the Japanese royal family was there for 2000 years. the Romanovs were preceded by the dynasty of Rurik, the Vietnam war was really against the Nguyen dynasty, and the Sunnis are actually a dynastic rule of Mohammad's descendants, like the shia are the dynastic rule of the cousin of Mohammad. the Mormons are the dynastic rule of Joseph Smith's many wives as well as Brigham Young's many offspring.

Gene said (March 26, 2015):

Being a Christian, I have proven beyond a doubt that the teachings of Jesus are true from personal experience and the experience of like minded people. Consequently, I have to assume that Jesus did not lie about anything including the Jews that believed on him when he said in John 8:44 - “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”

According to Jesus, the devil/Satan has been around since the beginning so he must not have been a concoction (egregore) of common thought and magic by the Levite priests or the elite Zionists. In the same verse, Jesus says that the devil is their father so they must worship him.

The lies about who the Jews really worship, the egregore if I understand the concept properly, serves to trap Jews in the elite’s custom made prison providing agents to do their bidding because the common Jew doesn’t believe they have a choice. The two primary lies that being Jewish is genetic and that Jews are God’s chosen people make it rare for a Jew to escape the illusional prison to worship the God of love, the real God. Jesus left the door open to everyone that wants to follow his teachings including Jews.

Although the concept of the egregore is true, it should not be confused, or used as an excuse, for the reality of who they really worship, the devil.

Tony B said (March 26, 2015):

This article brings a lot of peripheral, seemingly disconnected, truths into one central spotlight. Excellent.

Colleen said (February 22, 2007):

Mr. Makow,

One should be careful of making broad generalizations. In too many circumstances they don't hold up.

I'm a feminist, a mother of three fine young men, a wife of 24 years, a successful business owner, an amazing cook, gardener, seamstress and poet.

Feminism has not made me a slut who will sleep with anyone. My husband and I share deep love and respect. He admires my strength, intelligence and resilience. We are co-owners of our business and work well together.

Nowhere in your articles lambasting feminism, have I heard descriptions of feminists that I can relate to. I have many friends like myself who seem able to integrate feminism and femininity, feminism and marriage and feminism and mothering.

You are a mere observer of womankind. Your views hold no authority over the actuality of being a woman. You can't walk in a woman's shoes so quit projecting your "manly" beliefs.


Feminist and feminine,

Dear Colleen,

The proof is in the pudding. If you have a successful marriage and family, I have nothing to say to you but Congratulations! But just because you have found a balance, don't ignore the hidden agenda of feminism and the harm it is doing to others: the disintegration of the institution of marriage which directly led to the acceptance of porn, promiscuity and the sexualization of children. For more on this hidden agenda, read my section on feminism at

http://www.savethemales.ca/archives-subject.html

Eric said (February 22, 2007):

Thanks for the article but mostly finding a word for me that describes this evil entity and how it works. People are consciously and unconsciously putting their energy into it. Like some capitalistic market that gets stronger and stronger. I can feel it and I am tempted to concept it. That is the mistake here. Once this feeling is concepted into this world it becomes divided and eventually conquered. I fear we are much to intellectual and that our energy is in our heads, hence the structured way of our slavish programming. The human race is in bad shape and our need to communicate is the biggest pitfall that the evil feeds on. Feeling is the key, emotions will set us free, they carry the energy to lift the veil. All can be communicated that way too, just empty your mind and feel the goodness around you. Godspeed!

Ron said (February 21, 2007):

I am an 33 year old American pilot currently working in Africa as a B747 captain for a national airline. When I haven't been flying into
Europe and South America, I've been sitting in a secure compound in Kampala. Thankfully, I do have internet here although the living is pretty rough right now.

I just wanted to say that I am impressed with your commentaries, and have been visiting your website for life motivation. What you so
eloquently have put into words has been a major eye-opener to me.

I look at a lot of the problems in my life and realize that the feminist and homosexual and sex-saturated programming we are exposed to from day one has caused a lot of damage.

Well, at least the sex-saturated programming. I've always known that feminism was female psychosis and that homosexuality was evil and
disgusting. What is truly chilling and disgusting is who is driving all these social objectives, and why.

I am trying to deprogram myself and follow your advice, but it is not so easy.

Thanks again. We need more intelligent people like yourself out there fighting this noble fight and providing an alternative to the dark path society is on.

DC Dave Martin said (February 21, 2007):

That's a really powerful article you've written on the "God" that serves elite Jews. I will admit that that's the first I have heard of the concept of the "egregore." However, I believe that I wrote about the same thing in my poem "Look Up" at http://www.dcdave.com/article1/050298.html , only I called it the "purposeful collective" that serves no higher purpose than itself.

Your apparent blanket characterization of the God of the Old Testament might be somewhat in conflct with the poem, however. I contrast the current situation with what is called for in Psalms 121, "I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills from whence cometh my help. My help cometh from the Lord."

The contrast with today is not all that great if the Lord referred to is nothing but an egregore, the mere tribal construct of the Israelites. I like to think that many of the Old Testament prophets, and even the writers of the Psalms, have something a bit higher and more universal in mind. It's pretty clear that that's no longer the case when we are dealing with the Talmud, but I think that there's a lot more room for debate over the matter when it comes to the Torah, but then I'm no Biblical scholar.

---

Dave,

I'm no Biblical scholar either but perhaps I needed to be clearer. The elite made an egregore out of the Jewish God. But because of his tribal nature, he lent himself to this. When I read the OT, I have to decide what sounds authentic and what doesn't.
Thanks for writing.

Henry

Brad said (February 19, 2007):

Your article "The God that
Serves Elite Jews" caught my interest. The idea that this god is a thought form I have heard before. The metaphysists like Ledbetter and Hodgson wrote about these thought forms. They claim that a group of people believing in something creates these forms and with enough time and strong belief, these "thought forms" can actually make things happen in the real world (good and bad from the believers perspective).

They are very real and even feel themselves to be real and conscious but they aren't, their only reality being human thoughts and they simply do not exist unless human thoughts maintain belief. You most likely know about this but in case you don't I thought you would be interested.

Frank said (February 19, 2007):

George Piccard [The Liquid Conspiracy] relates the tale the Brit gave him on condition of
anonymity. It goes like this:

World War II was arranged by the elites of various traditions (Piccard mentions the obvious ones: Vatican, the Rothschilds, and... whether as
disinformation or not I don't know, "aliens".) But WWII was a disaster for all these elites, it could well have gotten out of hand and destroyed them all. So they got together and made a pact: They would set aside their differences, take over the world, sometimes favoring one group (the Vatican, perhaps) against another (Zionism maybe) and make it hard for an outsider to know precisely what was going on. It was a conspiracy that constantly shifted and moved, hence Piccard's apt term for it, "the liquid
conspiracy".

After they elites decided on their strategy, according to Piccard's Brit source, they "created" from their own will and awareness an entity that would hold and guard their ambitions till they all came true. Piccard's
description is interesting: The entity now creating the New World Order took on a life of its own, like demons and golems of folklore. Specifically Piccard refers to it as a "poltergeist-like entitiy."

So as you put it in your essay: "The same egregore – the desire to supplant God – animates the New World Order." Indeed it does. And if Piccard's source is accurate (and he feared for his life just divulging it) we know where and when, precisely, the contending forces of the NWO put their squabbles aside and created their uber-egregore. And although this one might be similar to the old egregore created by the Levite priesthood, it is infinitely more powerful and devious.

Peter said (February 18, 2007):

Concerning Lysson's view of the Old Testament passages he referenced, he seems to be coming from a poor understanding of the Bible. God makes it abundantly clear from the beginning that He made the earth and its human inhabitants and He expects people to obey Him. When they don't, there are consequnces. And why shouldn't it be this way? After all, it's His earth. He is the only one who has the right to set the ground rules.

From the beginning, human beings have demonstrated their stubbornness and have chosen to disobey God starting with the Garden of Eden. It didn't take long for man's disobedience and evil nature to reach a point where the "Lord saw how great man's wickedness on the earth had become, and that every inclination of the thoughts was only evil all the time" [my underline] (Genesis 6:5). In all the earth, he could only find 8 people that obeyed and honoured Him and took Him seriously - the sole survivors of the Flood. So did God kill everyone except 8 for disobeying Him? Yes, He did, and He's allowed to because He is God and it's His earth and He sets the rules - period.

After the flood, because of man's sinful nature, he went right back into disbeying God. So God got Moses to write down the 10 Commandments so that people would have no excuse about what they were to obey (Exodus 20). The very first commandment was "You shall have no other gods before me" and then followed "You shall not make for yourself an idol" and "You shall not bow down to them or worship them". So in Exodus 34:11, God tells Moses to "drive out before you the Amorites, Canaanites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites" because they were all disobeying Him and worshipping other gods. In verses12 and 13, referenced by Lysson in your article, God tells Moses to "break down their altars, smash their sacred stones and cut down their Asherah poles", in other words their objects of worship set up in violation of His commandments. I could go over every one of the other passages that you have linked to Lysson's essay and explain why God said what He said but I think you get the idea.

Does God only destroy nations other than the Israelites in the Old Testament? No. Because of their whining and complaining and unbelief, God didn't allow most of them to enter Canaan, the promised land, on the other side of the Jordan River. Because they didn't believe the good reports of Joshua and Caleb and "treated God with contempt", not one of them got to see the promised land (Exodus 14:23). They spent the rest of their lives wandering around in the desert until they died.

Does this sound cruel? Does this sound harsh? "I thought you said God was a God of love", people complain. Yes that is true but God has many aspects to His personality and nature. He is also the God of justice and at times He displays His wrath. But because He is the God of love, we can trust that whatever He does, it reflects true justice and Godly wisdom. Only He can operate in a fully just and righteous way.

There, you've just taken Bible 101. Oh and by the way, you can't lump the Talmud and the Old Testament together - they are two different things. The first 5 books of the Old Testament, the Pentateuch, are also referred to as the Torah. The Talmud, on the other hand, is a record of rabbinic discussions pertaining to Jewish law, ethics, customs and history (Wikipedia).

Donald said (February 18, 2007):

Been away for a while. Great post, it is rare to hear someone talk about the extermination of the Ukrainian Kulaks (Holodomor). 10 million people what a tragedy! This ugly little fact has been swept under the rug for almost 70 years. Probably because it would have embarrassed the sycophants (a.k.a. liberals) of the now defunct Soviet Union. A historian (I can't recall his name) once pointed out that starting with the Armenians continuing through with the various other varieties of communism and over 100 million people have been shot, gassed, drowned, stabbed, bludgeoned, buried alive, eaten, starved, frozen to death, stoned and etc. in the 20th Century and if something is done fast I am afraid the 21st Century will be even bloodier.

Manfred in Australia said (February 17, 2007):

The term "egregore":
Why coin a new word when the existing concepts of SPIRITUAL BODY and NATION-STATE are fully sufficient? I think Judaism has invented this discussion to distract well-meaning people from the essence of contemporary problems, which are entirely the result of Hebrew sophistry and Talmudic Deception as they dominate the wide range of social, political, scientific, and ethical life of the World. Wikipedia itself is of Judaist creation--a fountain of lies and distractions. I try to ignore it, having better things to do.
----

Dear Manfred,

It's significant that the woman used the occult term. It suggests a self awareness. --H

Ian in the Uk said (February 17, 2007):

I LOVED the article on Vaccines / Pharma (below). We have recently had a son and have had phone call after phone call asking him to have vaccines. We just ignored them and then one day our 'health visitor' came by, she totally invited herself. I was out , but she totally laid into my wife and said she would report us to social security for negligence and not looking after our child correctly. It was quiet scary and threatening. We know a lawyer and have sought advice and it is not law here in the UK that you Have to have them done.

My friend has two children of ages 12 and 14 and he never even registered with the docters and has had NO sickness at all really in his family. he gave us some great advice. i think the govenment is in bed with the pharma companies !Its awful

Did you know that the original meaning of the word '' Pharmacia '' is Manipulation or Witchcraft. !

Ben in Australia said (February 17, 2007):

Your latest article is of excellent quality, and really hits home. You've helped reinforce what I already knew: that Judaism has been manipulated and used as a tool to advance the ascension of a Zionist 'inner-party'. The paradigm of the Zionist is based on a false manufactured
sense of God; a 'god' that protects Jews at the expense of the rest of humanity. There can be no doubt that the 'Holocaust' has been placed on a
pedestal by the mass-media; used as a means to nullify 'anti-Semitism' and create sympathy for the Zionist cause. Only Jewish deaths seem to be of any significance. Christian Zionists, such as many in the 'Evangelical' movement, are indeed the most deceived. They think they are supporting the will of God, but in actual fact, are doing the exact opposite; they are advancing Satan's agenda. I am of the view that all true religions are representations of the one divine force; different interpretations stemming from different culutural perspectives. The path to goodness,
self-realisation, love, charity, truth and morality is the common path to happiness to God. 'We' have simply been brainwashed into accepting a manufactured 'clash' of civilisations. There is only one clash: the clash
between good and evil; humanity and its shadowy oppressors. We need to unite.

Jean from Hungary said (February 16, 2007):

Congratulations Henry: you gave a kick in the teeth of the egregore beast!

Only the Jews themselves can get rid of this beast because the blows coming from the "gentiles" cannot but feed it with the so-called "anti-semitic" vitamins as expressed by the "anti-semitism is a positive force for the Jewish people" claim from Dan Cohn-Sherbok. More and more braveheart Jews are fighting the beast and this shows enough that the Jews are not the problem: the egregore beast is a problem the Jews have and they are going to solve themselves.

James said (February 16, 2007):

Could I be as bold as to ask you privately your first reaction on the Zundel outcome... in a context of the Holocaust not of free speech.
---

James,

I think Zundel's jail term casts more doubt on the Holocaust narrative than anything he has ever written.

Henry