Direct Link to Latest News


Makow- All Porn is Gay

June 16, 2023


(Porn king relied on gay porn)


Think of heterosexuality as monogamous 

and dedicated to rearing children; 

homosexuality as promiscuous 

and concerned with sex for its own sake

and the more the better.







Satanist social engineers have made heterosexuals behave like homosexuals. 


Latest -Hef's Bisexual Son Joins Onlyfans


(Updated from Feb. 2006 and April 23, 2018) 

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

In 2004, a woman revealed details of Hugh Hefner's sex life. 

If the Playboy founder is any indication, a life dedicated to porn and promiscuity leads to homosexuality and impotence. The 60's icon of suave masculinity was, in old age, a grotesque self-parody.

Hefner, who died September 27, 2017 paid a bevy of whores $2000 a week to be his "girlfriends" and have sex with him every Wednesday and Friday. He used Viagra and watched male gay porn to stay erect while as many as ten concubines mounted him in succession. The other girls simulated lesbian sex to arouse him.

"He doesn't really do anything," says Jill Anne Spaulding, author of the book "Upstairs." He just lies there with his Viagra erection. It's just a fake erection, and each girl gets on top of him for two minutes while the girls in the background try to keep him excited. They'll yell things like, "F-k her daddy, f-k her daddy!" There's a lot of cheerleader going on!"

No one becomes a playmate without having intercourse with Hefner. The "girl next door" is now a whore, and Hefner's maudlin example of arrested development is a fitting epitaph for his Playboy Philosophy.

Playboy was not a spontaneous phenomenon. It was social engineering designed to foster homosexuality and family breakdown. See my "Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution." This is why Spaulding's revelations got so little publicity.


The "establishment" agenda is to destabilize and neuter us by encouraging homosexual behavior. This ensures we don't propagate since homosexuals have sex but generally don't have children.

They redefine "homosexual" as a "sexual preference" or "lifestyle choice" rather than a developmental disorder to entrap us. Never mind that the vast majority of homosexuals come from dysfunctional families or suffered sexual abuse as youths. Our reluctance to embrace homosexuality is considered "bigotry."

In response, let's take some liberties with these definitions ourselves. Having the right paradigm is the key to healthy behavior.

Forget about what you normally think of gay (same-sex) or straight (opposite-sex attraction.) Think of heterosexuality as monogamous and dedicated to rearing children; homosexuality as promiscuous and concerned with sex for its own sake.

Heterosexuality involves bonding permanently with a member of the opposite sex for love and usually procreation. It is participating in the natural life cycle, in the intrinsic meaning of life. Personal and societal health depend on heterosexuality.

Homosexuality is a form of arrested development caused by an inability to form a heterosexual bond due to identifying with your biologically opposite gender. As a result, homosexuals compensate using sex as a surrogate for love.

In these terms, society has become more homosexual because, due to social engineering (i.e. the "sexual revolution," feminism) many heterosexuals now fail to permanently bond. Normally, happily married heterosexuals can put sex in perspective and move on to more important things.

A perceptive reader recently wrote me: "If heterosexual sex outside of marriage is acceptable, if we eliminate the procreative aspect from sex, are heterosexuals any different from homosexuals in regards to the sexual activity?"

Exactly. I know these definitions are not "politically correct." PC is propaganda, social engineering and mind control. PC is an old Communist Party (i.e. Illuminati) term.

I do not disparage gays. According to my definitions, the vast majority of homosexuals are really "heterosexuals" like Hugh Hefner. And a small minority of homosexuals are monogamous and partake in some traditional heterosexual values.


Last year I wrote: "Throughout modern history, Illuminati bankers have used "sexual liberation" to subvert society and establish their subtle tyranny. As Masonic revolutionary Giuseppe Mazzini wrote, "we corrupt in order to rule."

The Illuminati bankers need to introduce "world government" to translate their unjust monopoly over credit into total world control.

They realized that they couldn't take control until they destroyed the family. This was a main plank of the Communist Manifesto in 1848, along with the creation of a private (Rothschild) central bank.

Every major "revolution" in modern history has increased Illuminati banker control and the sexual revolution is no exception.

The Illuminati used Hugh Hefner's "Playboy" to divorce sex from love, marriage, and family. They own the major cartels and control the media through advertising.

The movies are very effective in fostering homosexuality. Sex is often something reserved for your enemies. Recently I saw "Dr. No" (1962) again. The fashionable James Bond has sex with a woman even after he realizes she is involved in an attempt to kill him. After they have sex, Bond has her imprisoned.

In the movie Munich (2006), the Israeli assassins confront an attractive woman who killed their colleague. She displays her goods and suggests her death would be "a waste of talent." She thinks they might have sex with a woman they intend to kill.

Human beings are malleable and take their standards from movies. There is nothing so destructive to human society as the separation of sex and love. It reduces men to dogs, and women to fire hydrants.

The Illuminati wishes to harness sex in the interests of hate. Love is the enemy of hate and must be destroyed.



According to our definition of homosexuality, (i.e. promiscuity outside of love and/or procreation), all pornography is gay. The porn consumer is engaged in a promiscuous masturbatory fantasy. He is not focused on his marriage and progeny.

From what I have said, it should be clear that homosexuality is incompatible with heterosexuality, just as promiscuity is incompatible with monogamy. Gay activists admit their goal is to destroy heterosexuality.

Pornography is poisoning heterosexuality. There is a place for tasteful nudity as a stopgap while seeking marriage.
(See my "Managing the Male Sex Drive" ) But as you know, pornography has reached epidemic proportions. "Adult Video News" predicts revenue of $12.6 billion this year. The Internet has literally thousands of porn sites. TV and pop music increasingly are pornographic.

Pornography warps the way a man sees all women and girls. Many sites include girls as young as 14. See "Erototoxins"

Young females think they are useful for one thing only. Thousands in the porn industry display what everyone has instead of cultivating what is rare and valuable: femininity and the qualities sought in a wife and mother.

I hate to burst the bubble on a billion-dollar industry: Young naked women are practically identical. They have identical equipment. Boobs and bush. Symmetrical faces. Do men need to see literally thousands of examples?

There is something addictive here. Why don't men get sick of it? Why don't they suffer from gynecologist's fatigue? The plethora of breasts and splayed legs takes the wonder out of sex and causes contempt for women and impotence. Maybe this is the point: new drugs keep people running on empty. (See "The Porn Pharma Complex")

Sexual attraction is mostly a function of a woman's fertility. (Are men attracted to postmenopausal women?) Women are designed to marry and procreate when they are young and most attractive. Marriage ensured that men would have to commit if they wanted sex. By undermining marriage, occult social engineers have turned a critical social and reproductive activity into a lifetime obsession, better to divert, degrade and control the masses.


We were not prepared for the attack on our humanity by "sexual liberation" and porn. We didn't know our leadership had been subverted by the Illuminati.

Marriage and family are the essential building blocks of society. Family ensures that each new generation is properly nurtured and prepared for life. Most people receive values, purpose, identity, and love from their family roles. Heterosexuality provides life with profound meaning. There is no greater potential for love than marriage and parenthood.

Raising a child is the supreme act of devotion and faith in God; and is practiced and tested every day.

Homosexual social engineering is gradually destroying these sources of happiness and health, personal and societal. Porn is creating new generations of heterosexuals who behave like homosexuals. 


Related-   YouTube - What You Didn't Know About Hugh Hefner 

PLAYBOY and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution 

 "Confessions of a Survivor of the (Homo) Sexual Revolution"

A sex addiction web site.

New York teens turning to Lesbianism


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Makow- All Porn is Gay "

JC said (June 17, 2023):

How are healthy men supposed to get relief from sexual tension? They need sexual release every 72 hours. Having sex with prostitutes is now incredibly dangerous because most of them are probably vaccinated and will shed their disease. In fact, having sex with anyone who is vaccinated is incredibly dangerous. Also, having a family in this day and age raises a lot of serious questions. With the entire world rapidly descending into absolute hell, why would any sane person even want to bring someone into the world? It seems sadistic to me, and I'm not a homo.

Even Jesus Christ warns against procreating at the time of the end, and we are definitely approaching the time of the end: "Daughters of Jerusalem, do not weep for me. Weep for yourselves and for your children. The time will come when you will say, 'Blessed are the women you can't have children! Blessed are those who never gave birth or nursed babies'" (Luke 23:28-29). Emphasis mine.

Aldous Huxley was my favorite author. I think he summed it all up rather nicely: "Ignorance, militarism, and breeding, these three--and the greatest of these is breeding. No hope, not the slightest possibility, of solving the economic problem until that's under control. As the population rushes up, prosperity goes down.... Another ten or fifteen years of uninhibited breeding, and the whole world, from China to Peru via Africa and the Middle East, will be fairly crawling with Great Leaders, all dedicated to the suppression of freedom, and armed to the teeth by Russia or America or, better still, by both at once, all waving flags, all screaming for Lebensraum."
(Aldous Huxley, Island).

The unending flood of illegals from all over the world proves that Huxley was right.

SJP said (April 24, 2018):

Re: Why All Porn is Gay - I don't disagree with the article's premise, yet I suggest porn addiction and homosexuality are likely both a result of children being raised by out-of-control mothers and weak or absent fathers, i.e., a yearning for The Father.

I neglected to make clear that I think the appeal of pornography comes from anger at mothers and a sublimated desire to control and commit violence against them.

My own experience was that overcoming anger by forgiving my mother caused the appeal of porn to evaporate.

James C said (April 23, 2018):

What a biased, narrow-minded, ignorant question: "if we eliminate the procreative aspect from sex, are heterosexuals any different from homosexuals in regards to sexual activity?" The writer is probably a Catholic who believes that the sole purpose of sex is procreation. There are many valid reasons why some heterosexuals may choose not to procreate. For example, given the existing state of the world, I cannot imagine why anyone would want to procreate. Second, many heterosexuals suffer inherited genetic diseases, which they do not want to pass on to offspring. Third, the state of the economy has become so hideous that raising a family in this day and age is an ongoing nightmare. Unless you have a secure six-figure income, you shouldn't even remotely consider having a family.

In conclusion, heterosexuals are not gay simply because they choose not to procreate. On the contrary, it can be the wisest, most humane thing to do.

Howard said (February 26, 2009):

Great article Henry; few are honest enough to tell it like it is. 2 obvious points. If homosexuality is a trait born in DNA, by definition the trait exterminates itself with that generation. One of your detractors pointed out he was a gay Christian. I mean no offence here, but that's as impossible as a person being a Christian murderer, liar, pedophile, astrologer, or witch. I used to think the ultimate oxy-moron was Military Intelligence, now I think it may be Military Chaplains. Christianity like the bible is not negotiable; we can take it or we can leave it. Just don't complain to Jesus is He decides to do the same.

Don said (February 26, 2009):

Good article about all porn being gay. I have one question that I think readers should ponder. Why should anyone pay for this stuff when it is given away for nothing?

Anyone who surfs the net will sooner or later be re-directed to a porn site. There must be thousands of sites. If one chooses, they could look at these sites for days on end without paying a penny. So why would anyone pay for this stuff? In a way it is like a restaurant that serves happy hour hors d'oeuvres without limit in order to entice patrons to stay for dinner. I have witnessed that scenario firsthand and almost always the people eat and drink their fill and leave without buying dinner. Internet porn is similar in this respect.

Looking at it strictly as a business, I have serious doubts as to whether it could survive giving away free samples of everything virtually without limit. I would bet that the sites are supported by funding other than the viewers or that there is a mixture of “sponsored” porn and viewer supported porn. The banksters promoting this filth have no qualms about collecting money for something they are giving away for free anyway, so the fools that pay are an added bonus to them.

I don’t buy nor do I know anyone who buys – porn or magazines such as Playboy, and I’m not writing about 700 Club members etc. In addition, I’ve never seen anyone purchase such a magazine when I’ve been at a store. Maybe someone buys this stuff at 3 AM, but with the economy being what it is, there must be some cutbacks and we should expect to see some of these businesses fail. That is - unless people are so addicted to it they buy it instead of food, or it is financed by other means this industry will collapse. I believe that the porn industry is financed by other means and will always be available for viewing regardless of the economy.


Dear Don,

I suspect it is being subsidized to corrupt young women (the models) and all men. -h

BM said (February 26, 2009):

Your article "Why All Porn Is Gay" is certainly provocative. I think that "Why All Porn Is Male" would be a more accurate title, though: it involves the "male gaze" and biology. Of course, male-on-male sexuality would only compound this basically male phenomenon of... voyeurism? objectification? promiscuity? (This promiscuity is nothing new: look how much appears in the Bible for example, among various religious patriarchs. For one thing, look how many wives they had!)

The Illuminati religion is a SOLAR PHALLIC CULT. This idolatry is at the core of modern Freemasonry. I'd recommend looking into the relevant presentations by Bill Schnoebelen, and William Cooper's "Mystery Babylon" series (on YouTube), for ample documentation.

The Cabalistic/Talmudic traditions you rightly decry represent PATRIARCHAL traditions (the "Traditions of the Fathers", which Jesus condemned). They embody male supremacism - not only Jewish supremacism. When male supremacism revs up, you're likely to see a lot of porn and promiscuity (or, alternately, a lot of hypocrisy, repression, and sexual abuse/pedophilia).

Lesbians and straight women, in my experience, do not tend to be nearly the porn aficionados that many gay men and straight men are. It's primarily a MALE phenomenon - not a "homosexual" phenomenon. (If you notice a lot of porn within the gay male community, that's essentially because it's male-on-male, i.e. male squared!)

I would agree with you that the sex act has primarily a reproductive function (as many traditions affirm). From that base, we can perceive a continuum of sexual activity that spreads further and further from this center. You seem hung up on the "homosexual identity" issue, implying that there is such a fixed state as a "heterosexual identity": in fact, any such rigid division is arbitrary, manmade, and not found in nature. Nor do you address bisexuality adequately. (I certainly don't find that self-identified homosexuals and bisexuals are any better served by the Illuminati than are self-identified heterosexuals! We're all in a similar cultural mess: and ought to show more compassion to one another. This will help thwart the Illuminati's divide-and-conquer strategy.)

Animals, like humans, are sexual: period. Gender attraction is a complex continuum. It's perhaps unfortunate for sexual theorists that the messy reality doesn't fit into neat conceptual boxes... but there you have it. Reality is not binary - contrary to what the machine-mind would have us believe!

Sexual intercourse can be a lot of fun: but eventually it's probably time to "put away childish things" and aim one's sights higher, rather than prolonging Peter Pan priapism! Beyond physical beings and sexual beings, we are spiritual beings. Yet many monastic traditions have sought to repress natural human sexuality - with disastrous results! Perhaps there is a time to explore one's sexuality and go a bit wild (youth), and a time to become more disciplined (maturity).

Randy Rimmer said (February 26, 2009):

I have just read your article and could not keep from laughing. The internet is a wonderful illuminator for showing just how utterly
stupid some people allow themselves to become when their critical thinking and logical functions are overwhelmed by prejudices, bias
and/or underlying mental deficiency.

Unfortunately there is no cure for foolishness so you will just have to suffer as you do from craziness. You poor creature.



I love your name. Fitting.


Bill said (February 26, 2009):

nteresting coincidence that this was rerun on rense today. i visited today.

it features lesbian vids, hetero vids (but mostly anal or oral), strange fetish vids like vomiting and an occassional shockingly violent vid (real, not staged). its totally free. the combination seems to be a witches brew of some sort.

not sure how to trace a websites origin but i have a feeling it is a psyop.

Jubin said (February 26, 2009):

At first, I did not understand where you were coming from on any issue. Slowly, I started to come around, when I would read from other sources, lines of thought or events that you clearly and cogently had already confirmed. I fought you all the way though, always looking for holes here and there, mostly finding none, actually at this moment I cannot think of one. I am good at looking for and finding holes, inconsistencies, but reading your work, and looking up your background, I found none really, and like I mentioned I was looking all the way, every time, but came up against a logic that pointed to my own holes. ha! kind of the ultimate switcheroo. proof of something. anyway, for some reason at first i was put off probably because i was equating some of your work vis-a-vis men with robert bly (cooky). But as I mentioned the logic and the argument is so very tight and revealing at the same time that all you can do is say yes. so thanks. very valuable. For example, regarding ' why all porn is gay [encore]' , you put into place and words ideas that i have been aware of but could not quite make sense of, until reading some of your work. and then having it confirmed by outside independent events or persons. so thats good. take care.

Ben said (February 19, 2006):

You have articulated many of my own ideas regarding the role of pornography, etc, and its primacy in our changing culture. (I am referring to your recent article 'Why All Porn Is Gay.') I feel you are really on to something here. I think it can be stated that pornography has become the dominant cultural medium of the twenty first century. The speed with which it has surfaced from the gutter and into the very heart of the mainstream, has been breathtaking. As you rightly say, we were not at all prepared.

Its impact- particularly via the internet- with its indiscriminate range, combined with ever-improving developments in mobile technology, have yet to be fully understood; though its effects are being felt. We live in a confused, shadowy realm where technology is sexualising our infants (whose precocious development appears to be mirroring this, as if there were a causal, or material relationship between the factors) yet we succumb daily to ever more sentimentalised, even paranoid ideas about 'child protection'.

You may also have considered the distinctly homosexual- or, at least, the not-exactly heterosexual- qualities of many female 'porn stars.' This is another example of technology (in this case, cosmetic modification) contributing to the creation of a New Master Race. The idealized woman- so far as she exists in the imagination of the American smut industry- possesses none of the spiritual attributes so long associated with feminity. This is increasingly true of her physical aspect also. I have long believed that there is something non-female, even non-human, about the silicone-enhanced, inflated grotesques of popular smut. I fear it is most definitely the shape of things to come.

Consider also the industry's obsession with anal sex, and what we see revealed is the incursion of the worst aspects of gay culture foisted upon the mainstream.

Keith said (February 17, 2006):

Dear Henry
I agree with your thesis that all Porn is Gay and the general thrust of your argument, but I disagree on some technical points. I think it is a mistake to refer to them as The Illuminate. This will cause many people to dismiss you as a crank.
I prefer the term "The Brotherhood of Unnatural
Love", the BUL. This is what their chapter calls
itself in Australia where I live. I know a great deal about them from personal experience and from research.
Of course world wide they trade under a
proliferation of names, "The Uranians", etc, but BUL conveys what they are and encompassed all of history, while Illuminate implies they are something relatively modern. They are very ancient, but have never been all powerful and they are more vulnerable today than in
all history since we now know what causes their trait and how to wipe it out so they are frantic to stop the public learning the truth - which would finish them off.
And I think it mistaken to suggest that the belief of the Media and The Left that humans are infinitely malleable is true. If they were then they would have total control of us and there would be no hope for us at all.
Such defeatism causes people to give up in despair
which is the most wrong thing to do since we are on
the brink of victory over this ancient menace.
What they all fear and have always feared is the
light. Indeed folklore and popular TV thrillers
symbolism then as vampires and they are spot on!
But it is not a stake through the heart that is
fatal to them, but the simple truth.

Don said (February 16, 2006):

The U.S. Government and the chivalrous males are going to declare war on porn. Click here: War on Porn. Obviously, they do not understand why porn is so rampant these days and generating vast revenues. Here is a hint, women are not putting out for their husbands anymore and overall American women are ugly and mean to be around, so an American male has no choice but to find porn as a satisfying alternative to find sweet, pretty, lovable, and naked women. It is really easy to put the porn industry out of business - women starting having sex with your husbands everyday and do anything he asks of you, and the rest of you American women start being nice and sweet, willingly to serve the American male in any way he desires as is your calling as a woman. In the meantime, here's to Larry Flynt.


Chad said (February 15, 2006):

am a gay Christian. I’ve been raised in a Baptist family my entire life. I’ve known I was gay as long as any heterosexual knows they are straight – you just grow up knowing, it isn’t something that develops or changes over time. I realized I was different through my involvement in the Church. Thus, I kept it all locked up inside – even tried praying it away constantly when I was younger. I have never gone through any kind of molestation. My family is very healthy. My mother and father love each other and all five of their children. I just want to let you know how rash your judgments are. I kept my virginity longer than all but one of my straight friends – losing it only to my first and only boyfriend. Many of my gay friends are virgins. I’m not going to pretend that all homosexuals are filled with morals, because they are not. Exactly the same thing can be said for heterosexuals. Therefore, your statements in Why All Porn is Gay are completely uneducated and you, as an academic, should be embarrassed of your generalizations. Don’t speak of things you are not 100% sure of. How many homosexuals do you know personally?

Dear Chad,

Some gays are born gay because of testosterone imbalances in gestation. Apparently you were one. Don't be so arrogant. I have researched homosexuality thoroughly. I know a half dozen gays. I have even been to a gay bar. See my section on homosexuality at or go to

Anonymous said (February 15, 2006):

We are "programmed" through television and have been since its' invention and introduction into our homes.

It is used to manipulate our senses, and through
repetition (brainwashing), we accept that which is depicted to us on a daily basis.

They are attempting and have been quite successful thus far in conditioning a society to believe that sex is love and that both do not equal the sum of each part.

An instantaneous satisfaction without any strings
attached. Our young girls believe they are worthless unless they can deliver that which they see the female species project on MTV each and every day. T and A!!

The breakdown of marriages and families is the
ultimate price that we pay.

Whatever it is that they PRETEND to despise, we can be certain THEY are responsible for shoving down our throats every minute of the day.

The women's movement hindered and tore apart the
male/female relationship.

Women need men and men need women and not just for SEX!!


Their tool now for reaching millions of children is the internet where pornography abounds in living color.

Robert said (February 15, 2006):

Think about how much efforts and pains your paternal and maternal ancestors have endured for centuries to continue their own progenies through love, union and/or survival, culminating toward until your birth and life today. You are the today's product of your ancestors' efforts to survive by procreation or by love. That is the greatest gift of life and that gift
is you, God willing. That's same for your wife. That's same for everybody on Earth. That would be the same for all the children so hopefully they may continue giving the same gift of life to their children as their ancestors and parents did before, God willing.

So what does homosexuality really represents in a
nutshell in the today's world? A dead-end. No desire to continue the family lineage or keep giving the gift of life to future descendants? The gift of life is the beautiful gift from God.

True, some gays and lesbians have children (but I
suspect these children would end up as omosexuals
anyway, though they won't tell you of that out of
denial and uncertainty). Still, a large majority of gays and lesbians aren't really seeking to continue their own unique lineage to the future and would rather be just promiscuous with the members of the same sex for the sake of experiencing life's carnal,fleshy pleasures. That is a truly Luciferian gift.

When you have children, teach them the gift of life from God. God willing.

Jason said (February 14, 2006):

You're absolutely right - as usual. Homosexuality represents a mental and
societal disorder which threatens to undermine and overtake the important bond between men and women.

Homosexual activists, with clearly biased
studies, have been wholly unable to demonstrate a genetic link, though we do know that people can enter the homosexual lifestyle, leave it, and even return and leave again in cycles - hardly a hard and fast genetic behaviour.
We also know that homosexuality had been successfully treated for decades
into the early 1970's and even in places today (where those offering treatment aren't run out of town by powerful lobbyists).

We know that a disproportionate number of homosexuals were abused early on in life, and in
the case of male homosexuals, more often had strained relationships with their fathers (or absent fathers). We know that homosexuality is not a preferred sexual behaviour anywhere else in the animal kingdom - though researchers struggled to prove this as well, and that it is inconsistant with both evolution and creationism. That it continues to go unchallenged
and uncontested is mindboggling - especially when we consider that its teachings permeate every classroom across the nation.

Roberta said (February 14, 2006):

Viagra and the like have become part of the problem of pornography. They both demean a person by insinuating that sex is more important than the person. Thank you for your work.

Pat said (February 14, 2006):

Interesting to note as well that anal sex, previously considered a male-on-male homosexual act, has pretty much replaced vaginal sex in porn. And it's normally treated like the icing on the cake, the "ultimate", in much the same way regular intercourse used to be.

Christian said (February 13, 2006):

As a 30 year old married father of two children (3 and 1) I found it very refreshing and encouraging to read your article on pornography on the Jeff Rense sight (Old Hugh with the sad sad bunnies...)Before meeting my wife (now 9 years ago) I was the classical philanderer,
bedding every women I could. In a way this has provided me with a stable entry into married life, as that curiousity which to my mind is
artificially enhanced by almost every message fired at you during the course of a day, has been satisfied. Even though I cannot escape that
feeling that indeed sex divorced from love is the main message bombarde at everyone. I for one am sticking to my guns and am raising two beautifull children who give me such an incredible sense of achievement when I stop
and think about.

Not saying it's easy to maintain a funtional marriage and raise kids (who to my mind are influenced by the Illuminati subversion left right and centre), but reading your article certainly was a breath of fresh air.

Thank you kindly for sharing your insights (even though I do not always completely agree, but that's a thinking mans' perogative to my mind).

Thanks Christian, for reminding me that being a father may be the culmination of a man's development, and perhaps everything else is a preparation.


Thank you kindly for your comment, it is exactly the reason why any form of establishment is desperate to marginalise these fantastic aspects of
the human nature of the male species. The realisation that one can actually create new life out of love is nothing less than awe inspiring to
me. If only more would embrace this and try to focus their love and dedication towards their family, big government would have a remarkably
hard time selling their hollow diversions and keeping man from fullfilling a destiny that goes beyond the stars. After all, love is what makes it all
happen. It takes blood, sweat, tears and the realisation that some life force has chosen you to permit you to nurture it and teach you what powers
of conquest are at your disposal when providing limitless love and patience without wanting to reap any form of short term reward.

Yours sincerely, a proud young father.

Jeff said (February 13, 2006):

Henry: The cited similarities between promiscuous hetero- and
homosexuals are apt. But perhaps another all-embracing term would be
illustrative: autosexuality, another aspect of the cultural onanistic
solipsism being foisted upon an unwary populace. Best...

Good point Jeff. Sex without love is masturbation.


Lloyd said (February 13, 2006):

I just have a couple of questions for you. One of them is why do you hate homosexuals. The other is why do you seem to think that feminism and homosexuality were 'designed' to harm society? For one thing, the feminist movement has helped a lot of people. Women can now get promotions without having what you deem "homosexual" sex with their bosses. We now have the right to vote, maternity leave, and laws that protect us from men who thought it was ok to rape and beat their wives and children.

Also, For another, being gay does not make you promiscuous. In fourteen years, ive met maybe 200 openly gay men and women. All of them behaved in exactly the way you describe heterosexuals. They only wanted to fall in love with one person and have kids. Out of all the straight people ive known, at least half of them (more than 400 people for sure) have behaved in the slutty, trashy way you talk about gays. You mentioned also that gay people come from dysfunctional families. I realize you were probably talking about simply promiscuous people, but, just so you know, being "horny" isn't just a product of your environment. Its also your genetics, you idiot.


You are lying to yourself and others. Studies show that the vast majority of homosexuals are extremely promiscuous. I am redefining the terms so that heterosexuals can see what is happening to them. I don't hate homosexuals. I hate self destructive behavior.


Erin said (February 12, 2006):

I enjoy your writing and very much appreciate the
pieces in which you examine gay propoganda and it's effects on society. I thought you would be interested in reading an online article about so-called "pansexual" teens in a "progressive" New York high school. Reading this made me feel so very sad for today's youth.

It starts off as:

"The Cuddle Puddle of Stuyvesant High School
Researchers find it shocking that 11 percent of
American girls between 15 and 19 claim to have
same-sex encounters. Clearly they’ve never observed the social rituals of the pansexual, bi-queer,metroflexible New York teen."

Dan said (February 12, 2006):

It wasn't until the 1980's, with the availability of video, that I realized that porn is sooooooo gay.

At that time I would pay exhorbitant prices for 2 bucks worth of video tape. I'd pick them based on the lurid images on the box.
But when played, I noticed that 80% of what I was watching was guy's asses, guy's genitals, and guy's faces having climax. I actually used a stop watch to figure the percentage.......80%! With just enough female shots thrown in so the viewer wouldn't suspect he was watching gay porn!
The women were generall obscured by the back of the males, and their faces weren;t shown much at all. Only the guy's face was shown having climax becuase the women never did climax. How many porn vids did you ever see in which a woman actually had an orgasm? Well, it's just about nil.
It doesn't really work. I never got turned on by the males. But what it did was warp my view of women. It was a long, long time before I could see past a girl's body into her mind and heart.

Notice also mainstream reports occasionally that every country which the US had bullied their way into, has been flooded with cheap porn. Including Iraq.

Ronan said (February 12, 2006):

Your latest article is very interesting. If sex is for love/procreation rather than than just a pleasure principle then that logically implies that that contraception is immoral then you are very close to the official position of the Catholic church. Pope Paul VI reiterated the Catholic church's commendation of contraception in 1968 in an encyclical called Humanae Vitae (on Human Life) and he predicted the
catastrophic consequences of separating sex from procreation which has been fulfilled over the last 40 years.

All Christian churches rejected contraception until 1930 when the Anglican church broke with 19 centuries of Christian condemnation of contraception and the rest of the Protestant churches followed the Anglican lead over the following decades. Future generations will look at the Pill as not some wonderful invention but as the "suicide pill of the West"

BQ said (February 12, 2006):

Henry, I have read that the adult video industry is run by gay men now. That's why the videos feature women doing sodomy with men, among other gay bedroom activities. They are teaching men to do gay sex this way.

Rick said (February 11, 2006):

May I suggest an article dealing with all the porn on regular TV. I am at a point that I will not have the TV on when company is over. TV acts as a land mind for porno when surfing. And every sitcom has a happy fun loving gay in it. Isn't gayism so cute. Tee he hee.

Every time I turn the channel some woman is screaming yes. Flipping through REGULAR channels we came across an orgy is progress! Women were going up and down screaming yes yes while men in the background were masturbating on the rug. This was prime time and not late at night!!! Regular Canadian TV too! Any kid surfing alone can find this stuff. Then the churches just say, "Oh well. It's just a sign of the times."

A Therapist from Hungary said (February 11, 2006):

As you say, "There is no greater potential for love than marriage and parenthood." Marriage and parenthood are indeed the essential cements of the human societies. Most psychologists admit that a child raised in a non-familial structure (street or institution) or even in a love-lacking family is likely to develop personality disorders. Whenever these disorders are expressed by an exagerately submissive or dominating behavior, they generally result in a lack of self-confidence and, thus, an increased psychological influencability. The oligarchies monitoring the current social engineering in our societies are probably aware of these castrating psychological effects and are even satisfied with them: the elitist world these oligarchies are wanting can be realized only if most of us are unable to resist the „new world order” propaganda.

In Hungary, for instance, the actual government is such a puppet of the international banksters that the PM has recently proposed to take away the children from the poorest Rom Gypsy families and raise them in special institutions. As most of the at least one million Hungarian Gypsies (no official statistics are available) are jobless, it would concern several hundred thousands children. Fortunately, psychologists and social workers has alerted the public opinion in time against this criminal project. Traditionnally, the family is very important for the Hungarians and especially for the Gypsies. The Hungarian ruling class is such subverted to the international banksters that I wouldn`t be surprised if the project of isolating at once so many children from their parents was intended by these banksters to be a large scale social engineering experiment.

Those children raised without parental love are not only particularly receptive to any propaganda but are also potential killer machines: the deprivation of parental love results often in the unability to feel empathy. The nazis recruited the SS troops preferentially amongst the „Hitler Jugend” children who were early isolated from their families. The bloodiest soviet troops of Stalin were recruited in similar youth`s organisations. In more ancient times, the most fanatical and cruel soldiers of the Ottoman empire were the so-called Janissars who were taken from their slaughtered christian parents during the imperial campaigns and raised inside the imperial army. Today, the most infamous snipers of the planet who regularly shoot children or even babies in Palestine are often the offsprings of collective children raising inside militarised kibbutzim. Throughout history, it can certainly be found many examples of killer machines raised outside of natural and loving familial structures.

No doubt that the proponents of an elitist „new world order” are going to need legions of killer machines to slaughter the many millions who refuse to be enslaved. Some think these legions will be composed of lobotomised human clones but, both technically and financially, it could be much easier for the oligarchs to use the good old scheme of the Janissars...

Carolyn said (February 11, 2006):

I'm disappointed in your "Homosexual Sexual Revolution" article (the current one).

You speak of Illuminati Bankers ... we don't know that International Bankers are "Illuminati", but we do know they are Jewish.

You speak of porn producers as "Illuminati". That's the first I've heard that, but i do know they are almost all Jewish.

You say movies have the greatest influence on our behavior of all the media. Is Hollywood controlled by "Illuminati" or by Jews?

Wherever the Illuminati are, they seem to all be Jews! Or a large part of them, anyway. We can't ignore this fact, and Jews need to answer for it ... even the so-called innocent ones. They are too small a percentage of the population for this to be anything but a Jewish conspiracy. You are NOT helping us get to the bottom of it and stop it.

Dear Carolyn,

Funny how people who think they are persecuted are ready to persecute other innocent people. If I thought the conspiracy was "Jewish," I'd say so. If anything, the Illuminati may be half-Jewish like John Kerry. By your standards you'll have to answer for your half.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at