Direct Link to Latest News

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text | ShareThis icon Facebook icon Twitter icon Email icon
 

Mike Stone Blames Men for Women Going Feral

September 4, 2026

clancy-3-9.jpg
"It's men that gave them the right to vote. It's men that have allowed them into the workplace. It's men that put up with all their nonsense. So who's really to blame, us or them?

Like children smearing paint on the walls, women are desecrating their own appearance with ugly tattoos, nose rings, and piercings. Like toddlers throwing food and acting up, they're sleeping around in outrageous numbers with scores of men, walking the streets like hookers, and murdering their own babies. There's literally no difference between them and unruly children."

Makow Disclaimer- Mike Stone has a valid point but removing women's voting rights may be a bit harsh. What do you think?

Illuminati Founder Adam Weishaupt, about 1780--

"There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration."





By Mike Stone 
(henrymakow.com)

The Lindsay Clancy murder trial is headed toward a mistrial, which shouldn't surprise anyone because there are nine women and only three men on the jury. 

With White women across America in almost unanimous support of letting Clancy walk free, it's easy to see that at least one woman on that jury, if not all of them, are going to vote for acquittal. In fact, you could bet your bottom dollar that the likeliest situation in that jury room is nine women stridently and hysterically lecturing three men on why Clancy should walk free because she's a victim. A "victim" who has admitted murdering her three children.

Granted, Clancy was taking psychiatric drugs. And we've known for years that psychiatric drugs cause people to engage in violence. Virtually every school shooter over the last twenty years - the real ones, not the fake ones - was taking psychiatric drugs. So if we lived in an honest and upright country - we don't - then the makers of the drugs that Clancy took and the quack doctors who prescribed them to her would also be on trial for murder.

But that's not what this is about. None of the millions of White women who support Clancy or the thousands who are donating to her GoFundMe account are talking about prosecuting the drug pushers. They want Clancy to walk free for no reason other than she is a fellow White woman they feel sorry for and because they want the legal right to murder than own children if they ever decide to. 

If you have a hard time accepting that, then you don't know anything about White women or women of any race. (One of Henry's highly intelligent readers, DA, wrote recently that Black women are just as bad as White women and years ago they rejected Black men in favor of welfare, Section 8 housing, and food stamps.)

Are you a man who favors legalized prostitution? If so, then you are no different. You want prostitution legal JUST IN CASE you one day decide you need it. Women vote overwhelmingly in favor of legalized abortion JUST IN CASE they one day decide to murder their own baby. By letting Clancy walk, they hope to eventually make it legal for mothers to murder their own young children JUST IN CASE they one day decide to do the same thing.

Again, if you don't understand that, then you don't know anything about women.

jones-contrast.jpg
You can blame women for this all you want, but the fault, if we're being honest, lies with men, and, in particular White men.

You don't let a child run rampant through the house, smearing paint on the walls, throwing food, and acting up however they want. In fact, if a child is doing those things then you've failed as a parent. If you had raised them right, they wouldn't be doing those things. If you had raised them with love and respect and boundaries, they'd be as close to model children as model children can be.

It's no different with women. It's men that gave them the right to vote. It's men that have allowed them into the workplace. It's men that put up with all their nonsense. So who's really to blame, us or them?

Like children smearing paint on the walls, women are desecrating their own appearance with ugly tattoos, nose rings, and piercings. Like toddlers throwing food and acting up, they're sleeping around in outrageous numbers with scores of men, walking the streets like hookers, and murdering their own babies.

There's literally no difference between them and unruly children. And it's our fault. We've allowed it and now we have to live with it, because men lack the fortitude and the will to assert their God-given role as protectors of children and society. For men to do that, they would have to change themselves. They would have to stop acquiescing to women, stop hiring them, stop voting for them, stop having anything to do with them, and most of all, they would have to stop watching and jerking off to porn. Not a single man I know has the courage to do those things.

American men are pathetic.
---
Mike Stone is the author of the new book How to Meet and Attract Girls . . . and Why You Shouldn't  and Teen Boy's Success Book: the Ultimate Self-Help Book for Boys; Everything You Need to Know to Become a Man.



Comments for "Mike Stone Blames Men for Women Going Feral "

Christine said (September 12, 2026):

Makow Disclaimer- Mike Stone has a valid point but removing women's voting rights may be a bit harsh. What do you think?

Surely you and Mike Stone don't believe in voting, Henry?

It is a scam.

Since 1948, the "elites" have been relebtlessly pushing the UN plan (i.e. the destruction of "Edom" of the Zohar).

Voting just creates the illusion for the masses that they have a say.

Louis XIV & Co. were much more honest: they didn't pretend anyone had a choice about anything.

(Mie Stone is right about woman though. We are inherently silly and prey to the Devil, I'm afraid.)

Jennifer said (September 7, 2026):

As an American woman of mixed heritage—Northern European and Native American. I disagree with the idea that many women are supporting Lindsay Clancy simply out of gender loyalty but I agree they are supporting her for an anti-depressant defense. The women and men, I personally know supporting Lindsay Clancy are people, who are on anti-depressants themselves and they have a vested interest in having the anti-depressant-get-out-of-jail-free card.

I’ve seen firsthand how these medications can alter behavior and trigger unprovoked aggression. While visiting a family to help with funeral arrangements after their mother passed, I was alone late one night watching a movie. One of her adult sons entered the room in a zombie-like state and suddenly started kicking my feet.

When I screamed, it shocked him out of a sleepwalking episode. He claimed he was dreaming he was in a soccer game. It turned out he was dealing with serious health issues and on heavy antidepressants—he adamantly defends Clancy.

In another terrifying incident, I was driving through a slow, crowded parking lot with passengers. A man in his early 50s sitting directly behind me—who was also taking antidepressants—suffered a sudden panic attack. Disoriented and misjudging a car stopped at a stop sign, he panicked and reflexively wrapped his hands around my neck, trying to choke me out to "stop the car." I was forced to slam on the brakes to protect my life. Afterwards, he admitted his panic attack drove him to react violently as he mistakenly thought I was driving into a car.

Despite witnessing how these drugs impact people, I still believe Lindsay Clancy must be held fully accountable and convicted of murder.

The argument that her actions should be excused because she was on multiple medications ignores the fundamental principle of personal autonomy and responsibility. Every prescription antidepressant comes with a long, explicit list of warnings regarding severe side effects, including agitation, violence, and suicidal thoughts. Taking those medications—and compounding them—involves a choice and a known risk. It is no different than someone making the choice to drive drunk or becoming consumed by an addiction; the decision to engage with the substance or behavior carries responsibility for the consequences that follow.

When I experienced depression over a decade ago, I was well aware of the dangerous side effects associated with these drugs and chose not to take them. Adults cannot treat their doctors like authoritarian parents and abdicate responsibility for what they put into their own bodies. Furthermore, accumulating 13 different prescriptions often means navigating multiple providers without full transparency—another layer of personal misuse of the medical system.

If society allows medication to serve as a complete shield against criminal conviction for murder, it establishes a dangerous legal precedent. The doctor is not on trial here, nor is the pharmaceutical company. Lindsay Clancy needs to be held accountable under the law to make it clear that taking prescription drugs does not grant anyone immunity from the consequences of taking a human life.

According to data from the CDC, roughly 65% of American adults—over 130 million people—take at least one prescription medication, with millions on psychiatric drugs that carry black-box warnings for extreme mental and behavioral side effects. If we create a legal precedent where taking a prescribed drug absolves a person of criminal intent or personal responsibility, tens of millions of people suddenly gain a legal shield for violent behavior. We are moving into a dangerous era where people want a pharmaceutical get-out-of-jail-free card for murder.

rh said (September 6, 2026):

Clearly, Mr. Stone blames men! I say it’s bigger than that. The destruction of Family probably did more harm to the capital structure of the working American family than anything else. Expenses rise for both ex-spouses. Child support is a huge financial setback for most displaced fathers. I would argue that this is part of the socialist's plan…keep the masses stupid and poor. Socialism does not tolerate your individual monetary success. Only theirs. And the greedy so-called "capitalist" employer needs broke employees to show up for thirty years too, at skinflint wages.

In their barnyard, it's not good enough for these pigs to eat all the corn; but it's just as important that you eat none of it for them to feel okay. Destroying the Family served their ends. Now, we need to rebuild. Can we?

When I was quite young, my parents’ generation looked down on divorcees, especially women. They just saw it as wrong I guess. We have moved a long way from that position in 70 years.

JM said (September 5, 2026):

mike stone is 100% correct about women. glad im single never wasted time and money on women. had to work in a factory once with them ghastly money grubbers

Thanks J

"Men are no longer women any more" because women are no longer women.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Archives >>