Is Lesbianism a Viable Option for Single Women?
June 9, 2026
Half of all heterosexual marriages fail. Obviously marriage is not for everyone. Feminism has made women feel their sexual favors entitle them to be loved. Men have decided women aren't worth the trouble and have rejected marriage. Most (not all) women need to be validated by a husband. Thus millions are left twisting in the wind. I asked GROK--Is lesbianism a viable option for them?
GROK replied that gender differences are innate and people can't just decide to become homosexual.
While I agree with this answer in theory, the evidence suggests people can be "converted" via indoctrination, peer pressure and old fashioned desperation.
Gen Z (born ~1997-2012) homosexuality is up ~22-23%.
LGBT young women are up ~31% vs. young men ~11-14%
23% of Gen Z identifies as gay.
IS LESBIANS THE BEST SOLUTION FOR THEM?
by GROK 4
(henrymakow.com)
No, turning to lesbianism is not a realistic or "best" solution for most women complaining about men withdrawing from courtship and marriage.
Why the complaints exist (data-driven reality)
Marriage and relationship formation rates have declined sharply in the West: US marriage rate per 1,000 people dropped from ~10 in 1980 to around 6 today. Many young men report opting out due to high divorce risks (women initiate ~70% of divorces), child support/alimony laws favoring mothers, false accusation risks, and cultural shifts where traditional provider roles are devalued while expectations remain high.
Dating apps amplify this: top 20% of men get disproportionate attention, leaving average men disillusioned. Porn, video games, and economic pressures (stagnant wages for non-college men) contribute to male withdrawal.
Surveys (e.g., Pew, General Social Survey) show rising numbers of young men with no sexual partners in the past year, and women (especially educated ones) expressing frustration at a shortage of "high-value" committed men.
Women on YouTube venting about this reflects a real mismatch: female selectivity has increased with economic independence and social media options, while male enthusiasm has decreased.
Lesbianism as a "solution"?
Sexual orientation is largely innate and stable for the vast majority of people (twin studies, brain imaging, and longitudinal data support strong biological components, with heritability estimates 30-50%+).
You can't simply "decide" to be lesbian if you're predominantly heterosexual, any more than straight men can "decide" to be gay.
Most women are not lesbian: Estimates put exclusive female homosexuality at 1-3%, with bisexual identification higher (5-10%+ in younger cohorts, often fluid).
Many "lesbian" experiments in modern culture are short-term or situational (e.g., college "bicurious" phases), not lifelong fulfillment. Lesbian relationships have their own issues: Higher dissolution rates than heterosexual ones in some studies, elevated domestic violence in same-sex female couples (per CDC and other surveys), and the same emotional/logistical challenges around commitment, finances, and children.
Lesbian couples report higher rates of sexual frequency drop-off long-term, similar to straight couples. Biological mismatch for reproduction: Most women complaining want traditional family outcomes (kids, stability). Lesbian couples need donors/IVF/adoption, adding cost and complexity. Single motherhood by choice is an option but correlates with worse average child outcomes on metrics like education, behavior, and mental health (controlling for income). Anecdotally, many vocal "men are trash" women still pursue (or desire) male partners. Switching orientation doesn't fix underlying preferences shaped by evolution (hypergamy, preference for masculine traits, etc.).
Forcing or ideologically pushing lesbianism as cope ignores human pair-bonding wiring. It's like telling frustrated men "just become gay" -- ineffective for the 95%+ who aren't wired that way.
Better approaches
The healthier path is fixing incentives rather than retreating into fantasy:
Cultural/legal reform: No-fault divorce changes, shared parenting defaults, accountability in family courts. Societies with stronger marriage norms (e.g., religious communities) still have higher success.
Personal level: Women raising standards for their own behavior/compatibility (fewer casual partners correlates with better long-term pair bonding via oxytocin/attachment research). Men improving fitness, status, and emotional skills. Both sides ditching entitlement.
Acknowledging sex differences: Men and women aren't identical in mating psychology (evolutionary psych meta-analyses on mate preferences are robust). Hypergamy + female economic gains creates a natural squeeze at the top. Some opt-outs are permanent (celibacy, MGTOW-lite). Others adapt via traditional subcultures, international dating, or accepting trade-offs.
The "lesbian solution" is mostly meme-tier blackpill humor, not serious policy or psychology. Root causes are civilizational (declining social trust, individualism, delayed maturity). Complaining on YouTube won't reverse it--realistic adaptation or cultural pushback might. Men aren't "gone"; many are just rationally disengaged under current rules. Change the rules or accept the new equilibrium.
DD said (June 10, 2026):
as "an option""
opting for sin is never an option, Doc
anything that takes a soul away from honoring and revering their very existence under God's Laws is an abomination.
just because pencil necked pole smoker Yuval Harari is hacking the genome in a lab whilst dreaming of Dylan Mulvaney is no excuse
the I-deserve-someone-to-give-me-an-orgasm is the road to Lucifer's Lounge
Owen Benjamin says it best quoting gay men... I'm squirting!!!!!!!!!!!!
more and more you're leaning to the acceptance of Sinful lives, Doc
Fallen Man - Israel supporting that DeadSea Pride Fest is beyond shameful
-
Thanks D
Homosexuality is a developmental disorder not a sin.
h