Direct Link to Latest News

 

MGTOW - Men have Gone Their Own Way

February 16, 2026

What-is-the-MGTOW-Movement-and-Its-Impact-on-Men.png

 Women were designed to nurture husband and children and to be cherished in return.
Feminism taught them that this is "oppressive" and to seek independence and career instead. YouTube is full of videos of women complaining that men no longer approach them. 
They think their only value lies in sex but men no longer have to commit to get this.

Power = penis. Feminism has emasculated men and neutered women. It has turned women into mutants...lesbians or whores. OOnly Fans, 3.2 million women stream strip shows from their bedrooms. Ten million young women proclaim their promiscuity on Tinder. They don't love men. They exploit them.

Society has been subverted by Communists who want to destroy family and decrease population. These haters naturally label MGTOW as "hate." I warned about this in Cruel Hoax- Feminism & The NWO (2008) but womyn would rather be politically correct, and die alone and miserable. They have betrayed their society but more importantly, themselves.



Women really want the lifelong devotion of a loving husband. Heterosexual union requires the surrender of female power for male power expressed as love. 
They can have power or love. But, they can't have both.

I asked GROK---"Men Going their Own Way" MGTOW How would you describe this movement and its influence today?

By GROK 4
(henrymakow.com)

Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) is an online-centric movement that emerged in the early 2000s as part of the broader "manosphere" -- a loose collection of anti-feminist male communities. 

At its core, MGTOW promotes male separatism: men should prioritize their own lives, independence, finances, hobbies, and self-improvement while deliberately avoiding marriage, long-term romantic relationships, cohabitation, and often even casual sexual or emotional entanglements with women.

Adherents view modern society as "gynocentric" (female-centered), corrupted by feminism, biased family courts, divorce laws, false accusations, and perceived female hypergamy or entitlement. The philosophy frames opting out as empowerment and self-preservation rather than bitterness (though critics argue rage, fear, and misogyny often underpin it). 

compare-mgtow.jpg
Left, Commies regard resistance to their hate as hate.

There's a common "levels" framework:

Level 1: Reject long-term relationships/marriage.
Level 2: Reject short-term relationships too.
Level 3: Minimize economic participation (e.g., reduce taxable income to avoid supporting "welfare for single mothers").
Level 4: Full isolation ("going ghost" off-grid).

Most participants stay in the earlier levels. The movement is widely described by organizations like the ADL, SPLC, UN Women, and academic sources as anti-feminist, misogynistic, and part of male supremacist or extremist online spaces, with overlaps to incels, men's rights activists, and figures like Andrew Tate. 

It has been linked to normalizing hostility toward women, though some adherents and observers frame it as a pragmatic response to perceived risks in dating/marriage rather than outright hate. 

Digital ethnographies of forums (e.g., former r/MGTOW) highlight shared emotional support among men feeling lonely or displaced, while reinforcing narratives that blame women/feminism.

Influence Today (as of 2026)

MGTOW peaked in visibility around 2018-2020, with its main Reddit subreddit (banned for hate/incitement issues) reaching ~150,000 members before dispersal. Major platforms deplatformed or restricted many MGTOW spaces, pushing activity to smaller forums, imageboards (e.g., Wizardchan), YouTube channels, and scattered X/Twitter accounts.

In the mid-2020s, its direct organized presence has declined -- no massive centralized hubs like before -- but its ideas have arguably gained wider cultural seepage:Broader "manosphere" content (red pill philosophy, anti-feminist critiques, male self-focus) reaches millions via influencers, podcasts, TikTok/YouTube algorithms, with reports showing two-thirds of young men engaging with masculinity content online.

cancer-mgtow.png
Declining marriage/birth rates, rising male singledom, and young men's conservative/regressive gender views align with MGTOW-like opting out, even if not explicitly labeled as such.

Recent X discussions (2025-2026) show ongoing references: men claiming "huge numbers" are going MGTOW, women "done with men," or society validating MGTOW narratives through perceived toxic femininity and rigged systems.

Some 2025-2026 commentary frames 2025/2026 as a "manosphere" or "MGTOW" era, with men walking away from dating, approaching less, or prioritizing independence -- contributing to loneliness trends on both sides.

Incidents (e.g., rare violent cases tied to MGTOW rhetoric) keep it flagged by watchdogs, but everyday influence appears more diffuse: normalizing male disengagement from traditional roles without formal membership.

Overall, MGTOW today is less a cohesive "movement" with mass forums and more a philosophy/subculture whose core tenets (avoid gynocentric risks, focus on self, reject marriage/relationships) have seeped into mainstream male discontent discussions -- especially amid economic pressures, dating market shifts, and gender polarization. Critics see it as harmful misogyny fueling radicalization; supporters view it as rational self-protection. Its peak may have passed, but echoes persist in broader cultural trends.




Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "MGTOW - Men have Gone Their Own Way "

TA said (February 17, 2026):

I believe mgtow are individuals wanting to protect their assets and share it with close family members upon death and not some female that stuck around for an opportunity. Also, most guys cannot settle with one woman all their life. Imagine eating the same food day in day out. You'd want to eat something different or just not eat at all because it will lose its taste. Guys that settled, down my guess is, they could not get any woman after that.


James C said (February 17, 2026):

MGTOW is this an acronym meaning: "Men groping their own weiners"?

My theory is: "As above, so below." Above: Men are basically walking sperm, driven to near insanity by testosterone that has been unduly stimulated by the sight of immoderately dressed and acting women.

Below: Women are basically walking ovum, dressing and acting as though they either want or need to be impregnated.

And this theory explains why men must be financially successful, and women must be physically attractive.

Women are such hypocrites; they want to be able to dress and act like whores, then complain bitterly if men hit on them. It's an extremely sick and hypocritical game. IMO.


MM said (February 16, 2026):

I've been a long time reader of your website, I visit it regularly, and it's been a precious resource for me learning about the NWO and the powers that (shouldn't) be.

With that in mind, I'd like to comment on your MGTOW piece. Since I've been a MGTOW since before it had a name; since I'm part of that "movement"; I think that I'm qualified to comment on it. The piece got some things right, and it got some things wrong.

One of the major things it gets wrong, particularly the part that Grok wrote, is that we DO NOT hate women! If we hate anything, it's what women have become. We hate the system, its bias against and hatred of men, but we don't hate women. That's number one.

We do, however, view them as beautiful but dangerous creatures, much like a scuba diver would consider sharks beautiful, awesome, and yet dangerous. Thanks to all the power the state gives them, all a woman has to do is point her finger at us, accuse us of doing something terrible to her, and our lives are ruined. Will all women do that? No, but every woman can; that's the problem.

Secondly, we don't go all over TikTok and other platforms crowing about how happy we are as single men like women do. Those of us who are MGTOW talk about it amongst ourselves, but we don't go bragging to the world how great the lifestyle is; we don't have to.

Thirdly, many of us would like to be married. However, we've seen what happened to our fathers, our uncles, our brothers, our colleagues, and friends when their wives divorced them for spurious reasons like not being happy. Is it worth losing our houses, our savings, our livelihoods, and our children? Many of us have decided that it's not. Hence, we choose the least bad option: going it alone.

At the end of the day, MGTOW deals with the world as it is, right here, right now, today. We don't deal with it as we wish it were; we deal with the reality of today's world. The fact of the matter is that modern marriage, what many of us call Marriage 2.0, is a bad deal for men; we see that, acknowledge that, and we make the best of a bad situation. We do what men have always done: we adapt and overcome. That's what men do.

In closing, I enjoy your website. Keep up the good work! That said, the MGTOW piece isn't entirely correct. Thank you.


G said (February 16, 2026):

Thank you Henry, for standing up for hetero couples. I'll just add that for anyone focused on personal growth and/or spiritual progress, marriage, if properly respected, is an incredible vehicle to bring this about.

None will tell you the truth like a spouse who is in a committed relationship with you. And you will get a perspective from the other sex, so your assessment is well-rounded and not just coming from gender stereotypes.

Personally, the things my husband showed me about myself are mind-blowing. They took me out of so much game-playing, competition, and egocentric behavior. And at the same time, they helped me find much greater worth in myself and encouraged ways to nurture my potential. And thankfully there is fun to be had, too.

But most of all, the trust that develops fosters greater and greater love, and equally important, a place to lean when the challenges coming in are inordinately heavy. This, in partnership with God, gives life its sweetest essence, offers continuance to humankind, and stabilizes existence to face the greater world.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at