
"Zionism is but an incident of a far-reaching plan. It is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon."
Jewish banker Louis Marshall wrote these words in 1918 to quell anti-Zionist resistance from American Jews.
Zionism is one half of the Communist-Zionist (Left-Right) nutcracker that the Rothschild banking cartel is using to control political discourse and start debilitating wars needed to undermine Christian civilization and snuff out believers in God (including ethnic Jews.)
The ultimate aim is the destruction of Israel (and the West) in a world war
from which Communist China, Russia and BRICS will emerge victorious.
Zionism because it is an incident in a far reaching plan to rob humanity of its birthright.
Excerpt by Henry Makow Ph.D
Louis Marshall was a Jewish insider. In 1914, Louis Marshall was part of the legal team representing Leo Frank, a Jewish pencil factory manager convicted of raping and murdering a 13-year-old employee named Mary Phagan. Marshall initiated an ultimately unsuccessful appeal of the case to the United States Supreme Court.
In 1906, with Jacob Schiff and Cyrus Adler,[32] Marshall helped found the American Jewish Committee (AJC)
The letter was part of broader debates within American Jewish leadership between Zionists (favoring a Jewish homeland) and non-Zionists (who prioritized assimilation and opposed political nationalism). Marshall's position helped broker a temporary truce, allowing the American Jewish Congress to form in 1918 without fracturing the community.
Source and Publication
This letter appears in Louis Marshall: Champion of Liberty--Selected Papers and Addresses, edited by Charles Reznikoff (Jewish Publication Society of America, 1957), Volume 2, pp. 721-722.

Full Text of Louis Marshall's Letter to Max Senior (September 26, 1918)
To Max Senior I am informed that it is contemplated to hold a convention in Pittsburgh in the near future for the purpose of protesting against Zionism, and that you are to take a prominent part in the gathering. I feel a delicacy in making any suggestions on the subject, especially where my opinion has not been asked and the intrusion of my views may be regarded as offensive.
..." The American Jewish Committee, although its members are in the main non-Zionists, recognized the political importance of the Declaration, and its strategic significance as a factor in the effort to defeat the Central Powers and for strengthening the cause of the Entente. ...
I am confident that the Balfour Declaration and its acceptance by the other Powers is an act of the highest diplomacy. It means both more and less than appears on the surface. Zionism is but an incident of a far-reaching plan. It is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon. All the protests that non-Zionists may make would be futile to affect that policy...
I would regard public antagonism to Zionism at the present time as an act of treachery to the welfare of Judaism. I am not attempting to criticize anybody else's act. I am only telling you how I would regard my own action in the present circumstances. ...
Finally, let me say to you as one who has for many years studied Jewish conditions in America and who understands the beating of the public pulse, that nothing would so greatly tend to strengthen the Zionist cause at this time as the holding of a convention whose purpose it is to attack that cause.
The Zionists, whether their views be sound or otherwise, are the advocates of an affirmative policy. It is one that appeals to the imagination. It is replete with poetry. It is regarded by the religious-minded of all creeds as tending to bring about the fulfilment of ancient prophecies. It aims at the reconstruction of a land which has been under the oppressor's heel for centuries and which inspires enthusiasm in the hearts of those not easily stirred.

At this moment the entire civilized world is on fire with the inspiration that follows in the wake of a dramatic military victory. What can a handful of men, whose programme must be one of negation, accomplish against so positive a programme as that of the Zionists, endorsed as it is by the great liberal Powers of the world?
The outcome would be pitiable from the standpoint of the anti-Zionists. If I belonged to the Zionist organization I would ask for nothing better than such a convention as that which you have in mind be held.
It would be like Mrs. Partington seeking to keep back the Atlantic Ocean with a broom--you would be simply overwhelmed. But even that would not concern me. I believe ordinarily that every man should be permitted to seek happiness in his own fashion. But what does concern me is the welfare of the Jewish people, not only in America, but in foreign lands. Knowing as I do the sacrifices that you have made for them, the splendid service that you rendered while abroad in the interest of the Joint Distribution Committee, I regard it as my duty to ask you to do all that lies in your power to defer the holding of any convention of the kind proposed until the war is over. Give me the credit of believing that I am speaking advisedly.
-
JD said (October 5, 2025):
Nah- they're all dying for the glory of the the 2 religions( government + Judaism) they all worship like the zombies on steroids they all are. "Stupid is as stupid does", so "good riddance", I say.
Fro my song:"Hell 2 Pay":
"You might be a big-shot mafioso hit man,
Or just another dumb-ass murderer for your state.... there'll be hell to pay, there's gonna be hell to pay"
From "Hell 2 Pay":
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Q32DADQNOMo&list=RDQ32DADQNOMo&start_radio=1&pp=ygUVSGVsbCAyIHBheSBmYWtlIGV5ZSBkoAcB