With the US and Russia trading threats of nuclear war, 

it would be comforting to know nuclear weapons

do not exist. I have difficulty believing those missiles are 

all props, but for the sake of argument,

I post this. Make up your own mind.

by Patrick O'Carroll

(henrymakow.com)

THREE SPECTACULAR ANECDOTES PROVING THAT NUKES ARE FAKE

In Jul 2025, Scotsman Thomas Judge told the "Delingpod" why nuclear weapons do not exist (start = 7 minutes):

https://rumble.com/v6wm2yc-thos-judge.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a

Anecdote #1: Ex-British PM Harold Wilson confirmed GB, US, RU etc. have NO nuclear deterrent

In Dec 1982, Thomas met former British prime-minister Harold Wilson (a Yorkshireman whose full name was James Harold Wilson). Wilson said "Call me Jim", and they got talking about the "Aden Emergency" of 1963-67 when Wilson sent troops to their deaths (and this was still causing him sleepless nights). Thomas asked him "Why did you not push the BIG RED BUTTON, the one that fires the missiles?" 

But Wilson replied: "My OPINION [spoken to skirt around Britain's Official Secrets Act] is that Britain does not have an effective nuclear deterrent. But I will caveat that by saying that it is not a problem because no one else has one either".

So, Thomas asked "Are you telling me that nuclear weapons do not exist?" to which Wilson gave the same reply.

Wilson claimed he did not know (for sure) whether the US president was aware that there were in fact no nuclear weapons. But, he said that the top Russian politicos were almost certainly aware of this fact.

Anecdote #2: Top British Nuclear Scientists confirmed that Nuclear Weapons do not exist

Aldermaston is an air-force base in southern England that is tied to Britain's AWRE (Atomic Weapons Research Establishment), and also to many marches by the "Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament" (CND). The reason for the marches is because Aldermaston is only about 7 miles from (protest-ridden) Greenham Common.

In 1978, Thomas (from Kilmarnock in Scotland) shared a house with two Aldermaston scientists who told him "Nuclear weapons do not exist, it is all a fraud". These scientists also went to the Greenham Common rallies where they openly advised the protestors that nuclear weapons are made-up nonsense and do not even exist.

Anecdote #3: British Nuclear Inspector confirmed that "Nuclear" Missiles have no Nuclear Warheads

Thomas' brother worked for British Military (MOD) Police at the British Navy base in Faslane-on-Clyde, Scotland. Before his death in 2010, Thomas' brother confirmed to him several times, that nuclear weapons do not exist. Also, whenever the Greenham Common CND protesters came to Faslane, Thomas' brother would shout at them: "Just go home, we do not have anything here, there is nothing to see. Honestly, we do not have anything. I do not know what you are all worried about". Thomas' brother also spent years patrolling British nuclear-submarines and military-bases and, on occasion, took a closer look. He could recognize that missiles indeed existed but they had no actual warheads. Hence, he could see that these were in fact wholly-unarmed "pretend-missiles".

THE KEY SCIENTIFIC CRUX

Thomas says the key scientific crux is: Nuclear fission is non-explosive because all explosions are gas-related.

There WERE explosions at the nuclear power plants Chernobyl (1986) and Fukushima (2011), BUT these were GAS EXPLOSIONS that were caused by the buildup of hydrogen. They were not nuclear explosions. And that is because nuclear fission is not explosive and it must be induced and moderated. In Fukushima today you get more radiation from the "Team Antichrist" Scanner at the airport-security-gates than you do from the environment.

The notorious "mushroom cloud" (faked in the Trinity Site video) is white at the top, which is just water vapor from the TNT. Then it is all yellow, which is a hydrogen fire, caused by hydrogen gas, or else gasoline, burning. Then you see smoke but that is just from the combustion of the target's own hydrocarbons.

In a nuclear reactor, the neutrons escape from the core of the nuclear reactor and into the moderator, which is usually water. This heats up the water, and slows the neutrons down. The key is that this process continues many times while the steam that is generated drives turbines and generates electricity. Thus, we are actually living in the age of STEAM because "nuclear" energy is in fact steam-powered energy. By contrast, a purely-theoretical nuclear bomb is a (nonexistent) small, portable, un-moderated, un-cooled nuclear reactor. And because a nuclear weapon has no moderator, the neutrons just fly away. That means that none of the neutrons is captured (hence no heat) and, hence, there can be no chain reaction in a nuclear weapon. In a nutshell, a nuclear weapon has 1) NO EXPLOSION and 2) NO CHAIN REACTION. Hence, a nuclear weapon can NOT work.

Why Hiroshima and Nagasaki were HOAXES

On 31 May 1945, US physicist Arthur Compton told the (fake) Manhattan Project's "Interim Committee" that it would take at least two more years to develop plutonium purification; and that it would take a further year (until 1948) to obtain a sufficient quantity of plutonium. The minutes of this meeting ALSO state that even reactor-grade uranium was in short supply in May 1945, meaning insufficient for any "A Bombs". Thus, we can conclude from the documents and experimental studies that it was impossible to build "A Bombs" in summer 1945.

[Oppenheimer was one of the top four fake-"scientists" of all time, along with Newton, Einstein, and Hawking.]

In Jun 2025, ZioFascist Donald Trump claimed he "bombed 3 Iranian enrichment facilities". But, Thomas asks: If a uranium-based nuclear bomb was never, ever tested and could never, ever work, why on Earth would Iran even be "enriching uranium" in the first place? Thomas says uranium exists in the Earth as about 2 percent of an ORE. Essentially, there are three major isotopes of uranium (U238, U235, and U234). Bomb-builders focus on U235, which only comprises about 0.7 percent of the raw material. Enrichment means increasing the proportion of U235 to roughly 80 percent. Thus, you need around 115 times more volume of raw uranium for that enrichment to work.

Effectively, the alleged "design" of the (nonexistent) uranium nuke deployed at Hiroshima was: Firing a bullet at a piece of 75-percent-enriched U235 in a gun barrel, which allegedly produced a "nuclear reaction". But Thomas says that is nonsense because it would NEVER work. Hence, it is pure fantasy to allege that Iran would even be "enriching uranium" to copy this failed Hiroshima "design". Also, "modern bomb technology" (which also does not work) is alleged to be plutonium-based, so why did the recent "Trump Iran Bombing" even involve uranium?

CONCLUSION

Thomas sums up the MOTIVE for faking the existence of nukes as follows: To control the slaves, the controllers need FEAR on one side and MONEY on the other. A second reason is that nukes provide "Team Antichrist" with a reason to "justify" the existence of supra-national "governance" bodies to bully independently-spirited nations.

A third reason is to give "Team Antichrist" a welcome opportunity to loot taxpayer money via nuclear "accidents" (Fukushima = 260 billion USD, Chernobyl = 200 billion USD, etc.) https://live.staticflickr.com/5332/16982282964_b8b75f6b30_c.jpg

Thomas rounds off with a powerful synopsis: "It is called BRAINWASHING. We have lived for 80 years under the threat of a nuclear holocaust and the destruction of the world because of some videos that somebody forged. Now, just look at that video: It is an explosion and a mushroom cloud but that is not actually possible. And, if nuclear fission is not explosive, then where did that explosion come from?"

In a nutshell, nukes are about as genuine, or as real, as "New Clear Fishin' ..."

Thomas Judge's website: https://thosjudge.com/

Thomas 2020 book "Nuclear Weapons; Fact or Fiction" is available here: https://thosjudge.com/nuclear-weapons-fact-or-fiction/.

-

Related - Michael Palmer MD--No Nuclear Bombs Dropped on Japan