April 2018 Archives

The Real Agenda Behind "Gay Rights"

| 1 Comment
justin-trudeau-toronto-pride-parade-2017.jpg

(left, Prime Minister Castro and wife at Toronto Gay Pride Parade 2017) 

Because of the Masonic control of government and media, society is

stupidly oblivious to the hate-filled attack on our heterosexual identity, an attack most vicious, insidious, and pervasive. Do you remember any public debate and vote on this subject? The article below documents the real agenda behind "gay rights"

i.e. destroying the heterosexual character of society. 

Written 17 years ago, it is prescient.






The Other Attack on Our Manhood ( Updated from Sept. 2001) 

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Since 1970, gay-feminist activists have waged a campaign to foster homosexuality among heterosexuals. They are candid about this goal. 

worst.jpeg

"The end goal of the feminist revolution is the elimination of the sex distinction itself," says Shulamith Firestone (The Dialectic of Sex, 1972, p.11) "Heterosexual hegemony is being eroded," says Gary kinsman.

 "The forms of sexuality considered natural have been socially created and can be socially transformed." (The Regulation of Desire: Sexuality in Canada, 1987, p.219) 

"In a free society, everyone will be gay," says Allen Young, a pioneer of the Gay Liberation Movement. (John D'Emilio, Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America, p.322)


Unlike us, gays understand that their campaign for "equal rights" will erase the distinction between gay and straight. In the words of gay historian Jonathan Katz:

gayteens.jpg

In one sense the right is right...to accuse the gay and lesbian rights movement of threatening homogenization....if gay and lesbian liberationists ever achieve full equality, they will do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division. The secret of the most moderate, mainstream gay and lesbian civil rights movement is its radically transformative promise (or threat, depending on your values). The Invention of Heterosexuality, 1995, p.188.

Gay and feminist activists have found common cause because ignoring all scientific evidence, they insist male-female distinctions are artificial. While many heterosexuals consider themselves "feminists", feminism is a homosexual movement. It believes that men and women are not only equal but the same and only social conditioning makes us different. Homosexuality is love of the same.

Today, gay and feminist activists want "people" to make love to "people" regardless of their sex. They depict normal heterosexual behavior as pathological. They demonize men as abusers and the heterosexual family as oppressive. The way to social justice, they believe, is to abolish heterosexuality altogether.

Gay-feminist activism is founded in Marxism and is a subversive force. Both the Gay and Woman's liberation movements were spawned by the 1960's Marxist "New Left" These groups transferred the Marxist analysis of class to gender. The goal is the same: the "patriarchy" (white men, capitalism, class) is the source of all evil and must be destroyed ("transformed"). Women (the proletariat) and anyone else deemed "oppressed" (gays, certain favored minorities) must be handed position and power.


LACK OF RESISTANCE


Why have straights passively endured this attack?

 1) The gay-feminists have waged their war with impunity by asserting their victim status. Guilt, whether founded or not, is a very potent weapon. Straights can't even defend their own sexuality for fear of accusations of "homophobia" and "sexism." These days anyone who does not want to be gay is homophobic. 

Sweden-Toys-R-Us-Ad.jpg

(Current Toys R Us Ad in Sweden)

2) Typical Marxists, they practiced deceit successfully. They attracted widespread support by pretending to champion women when in fact they always had a revolutionary homosexual agenda. Now politicians and media are in massive denial because they have empowered these radicals and even put them in charge of educating the young. The situation is comparable to the liberal refusal in the 1940's and 1950's to admit the government was riddled with Soviet Spies.

Many public schools virtually "break the ice" for gays. For example, the Grade Seven curriculum in Ontario introduces 12-year-old children to oral and anal sex. Phyllis Benedict, president of the Ontario Elementary Teacher's Federation said the union is "trying to promote a more positive [homosexual] environment in schools." (National Post, Aug.16) This extends to undermining the heterosexual family by reading books like "Aasha's Moms" and "Two Dads, Brown Dads, Blue Dads."

On the other hand, heterosexuality is virtually a taboo. Our children's textbooks have been rewritten to eliminate any hint that men and women might be different, live in traditional families, or behave in "stereotypical" ways. 

As a university lecturer, I tried to teach novelists like D.H. Lawrence, who portrayed male-female love in positive terms. I was accused of "sexual harassment" by feminist activists and lost my job. (Sexual harassment is now defined as anything that makes a feminist uncomfortable.)

DEMORALIZATION

As heterosexuals, we cannot explore our sexuality because homosexuals may be "uncomfortable." This has led to the demoralization of society. We cannot celebrate men as masculine and women as feminine. We do not celebrate heterosexual love, the greatest gift that life offers us. This daily denial of our sexual identity amounts to persecution. It used to be 'live and let live.' Now gay and feminist activists will not let us live.

ross-r.jpg

In a recent episode of the TV show Friends, Ross and Rachel are in a sports car. Rachel avoids paying a speeding fine by flirting with the handsome traffic cop. Ross takes the steering wheel and is stopped for driving too slowly. Well, if Rachel can do it, so can he. Ross tries to flirt with the male cop. I found Ross' behavior demeaning and embarrassing. The message is that we can all go both ways -- even the cop. This is the reality behind the gay activist demand for "equality". It isn't enough to tolerate them, we must become them. It doesn't matter if we are comfortable, as long as they are.

There was more on the same Friends episode. Chandler's father apparently is a drag queen. (Hypocritically, "he" is played by Kathleen Turner.) Chandler and Monica attend a drag performance by his father. Chandler reveals that he and Monica are getting married soon. There is awkwardness because dad wasn't invited. But don't despair. Chandler invites him to the wedding and we all enjoy a liberal "feel good" moment.

This situation would be deeply humiliating to any male who honors his own masculinity. We model ourselves on our fathers. Marriage is a heterosexual sacrament. A drag queen represents everything the son has rejected. But heterosexual values don't matter as long as drag queens are made comfortable. It's a wonder Chandler isn't gay himself. Stay tuned.

Homosexual behavior makes straights uncomfortable. Most men find the sight of two men kissing deeply repulsive. Gay families are not the same as ours. The adoption of straight children by gays denies their differences and distorts development. Gay marriages are different from hetero marriages and should have a different status. The gay demand for "equality" deliberately distorts our perceptions of ourselves. It implies the gay experience is the same as ours. It is not. As Katz says, the "secret" purpose is to "do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division."

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the homosexual model does not fit heterosexuals. It's time to recognize that homo and heterosexuality are in fierce competition. There can only be one model. The most important domestic issue of the dawning 21st Century is:

Will ours be a heterosexual society that tolerates a 4% gay minority?

Or, will it be a homosexual society that persecutes a 96% straight majority? History is full of examples of minorities that have persecuted majorities. Take Communism for example.

If straights don't establish the norms, gay activists will. 

-------------------

Related - Gays Acknowledge their Lifestyle is Toxic

------------------- Charles Socarides MD   - How America Went Gay 

-------------------- Gender Ideology Goes off the Deep End 

Why All Porn is Gay

| 27 Comments
Hefner.jpg

(Porn king relied on gay porn)


Think of heterosexuality as monogamous 

and dedicated to rearing children; 

homosexuality as promiscuous 

and concerned with sex for its own sake.





Porn is creating new generations of heterosexuals who behave like homosexuals. 


(Updated from Feb. 2006) 

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

In 2004, a woman revealed details of Hugh Hefner's sex life.

If the Playboy founder is any indication, a life dedicated to porn and promiscuity leads to homosexuality and impotence. The 60's icon of suave masculinity was, in old age, a grotesque self-parody.

Hefner, who died last September, paid a bevy of whores $2000 a week to be his "girlfriends" and have sex with him every Wednesday and Friday. He used Viagra and watched male gay porn to stay erect while as many as ten concubines mounted him in succession. The other girls simulated lesbian sex to arouse him.

"He doesn't really do anything," says Jill Anne Spaulding, author of the book "Upstairs." He just lies there with his Viagra erection. It's just a fake erection, and each girl gets on top of him for two minutes while the girls in the background try to keep him excited. They'll yell things like, "F-k her daddy, f-k her daddy!" There's a lot of cheerleader going on!"

No one becomes a playmate without having intercourse with Hefner. The "girl next door" is now a whore, and Hefner's maudlin example of arrested development is a fitting epitaph for his Playboy Philosophy.

Playboy was not a spontaneous phenomenon. It was social engineering designed to foster homosexuality and family breakdown. See my "Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution." This is why Spaulding's revelations got so little publicity.


DEFINING HOMOSEXUAL AND HETEROSEXUAL


The "establishment" agenda is to destabilize and neuter us by encouraging homosexual behavior. This ensures we don't propagate since homosexuals have sex but generally don't have children.

They redefine "homosexual" as a "sexual preference" or "lifestyle choice" rather than a developmental disorder to entrap us. Never mind that the vast majority of homosexuals come from dysfunctional families or suffered sexual abuse as youths. Our reluctance to embrace homosexuality is considered "bigotry."

In response, let's take some liberties with these definitions ourselves. Having the right paradigm is the key to healthy behavior.

Forget about what you normally think of gay (same-sex) or straight (opposite-sex attraction.) Think of heterosexuality as monogamous and dedicated to rearing children; homosexuality as promiscuous and concerned with sex for its own sake.

Heterosexuality involves bonding permanently with a member of the opposite sex for love and usually procreation. It is participating in the natural life cycle, in the intrinsic meaning of life. Personal and societal health depend on heterosexuality.

Homosexuality is a form of arrested development caused by an inability to form a heterosexual bond due to identifying with your biologically opposite gender. As a result, homosexuals compensate using sex as a surrogate for love.

In these terms, society has become more homosexual because, due to social engineering (i.e. the "sexual revolution," feminism) many heterosexuals now fail to permanently bond. Normally, happily married heterosexuals can put sex in perspective and move on to more important things.

A perceptive reader recently wrote me: "If heterosexual sex outside of marriage is acceptable, if we eliminate the procreative aspect from sex, are heterosexuals any different from homosexuals in regards to the sexual activity?"

Exactly. I know these definitions are not "politically correct." PC is propaganda, social engineering and mind control. PC is an old Communist Party (i.e. Illuminati) term.

I do not disparage gays. According to my definitions, the vast majority of homosexuals are really "heterosexuals" like Hugh Hefner. And a small minority of homosexuals are monogamous and partake in some traditional heterosexual values.


HOW SEX BECAME AN ACT OF HATE


Last year I wrote: "Throughout modern history, Illuminati bankers have used "sexual liberation" to subvert society and establish their subtle tyranny. As Masonic revolutionary Giuseppe Mazzini wrote, "we corrupt in order to rule."

The Illuminati bankers need to introduce "world government" to translate their unjust monopoly over credit into total world control.

They realized that they couldn't take control until they destroyed the family. This was a main plank of the Communist Manifesto in 1848, along with the creation of a private (Rothschild) central bank.

Every major "revolution" in modern history has increased Illuminati banker control and the sexual revolution is no exception.

The Illuminati used Hugh Hefner's "Playboy" to divorce sex from love, marriage, and family. They own the major cartels and control the media through advertising.

The movies are very effective in fostering homosexuality. Sex is often something reserved for your enemies. Recently I saw "Dr. No" (1962) again. The fashionable James Bond has sex with a woman even after he realizes she is involved in an attempt to kill him. After they have sex, Bond has her imprisoned.

In the movie Munich (2006), the Israeli assassins confront an attractive woman who killed their colleague. She displays her goods and suggests her death would be "a waste of talent." She thinks they might have sex with a woman they intend to kill.

Human beings are malleable and take their standards from movies. There is nothing so destructive to human society as the separation of sex and love. It reduces men to dogs, and women to fire hydrants.

The Illuminati wishes to harness sex in the interests of hate. Love is the enemy of hate and must be destroyed.

ALL PORN IS GAY


According to our definition of homosexuality, (i.e. promiscuity outside of love and/or procreation), all pornography is gay. The porn consumer is engaged in a promiscuous masturbatory fantasy. He is not focused on his marriage and progeny.

From what I have said, it should be clear that homosexuality is incompatible with heterosexuality, just as promiscuity is incompatible with monogamy. Gay activists admit their goal is to destroy heterosexuality.

Pornography is poisoning heterosexuality. There is a place for tasteful nudity as a stopgap while seeking marriage.
(See my "Managing the Male Sex Drive" ) But as you know, pornography has reached epidemic proportions. "Adult Video News" predicts revenue of $12.6 billion this year. The Internet has literally thousands of porn sites. TV and pop music increasingly are pornographic.

Pornography warps the way a man sees all women and girls. Many sites include girls as young as 14. See "Erototoxins"

Young females think they are useful for one thing only. Thousands in the porn industry display what everyone has instead of cultivating what is rare and valuable: femininity and the qualities sought in a wife and mother.

I hate to burst the bubble on a billion-dollar industry: Young naked women are practically identical. They have identical equipment. Boobs and bush. Symmetrical faces. Do men need to see literally thousands of examples?

There is something addictive here. Why don't men get sick of it? Why don't they suffer from gynecologist's fatigue? The plethora of breasts and splayed legs takes the wonder out of sex and causes contempt for women and impotence. Maybe this is the point: new drugs keep people running on empty. (See "The Porn Pharma Complex")

Sexual attraction is mostly a function of a woman's fertility. (Are men attracted to postmenopausal women?) Women are designed to marry and procreate when they are young and most attractive. Marriage ensured that men would have to commit if they wanted sex. By undermining marriage, occult social engineers have turned a critical social and reproductive activity into a lifetime obsession, better to divert, degrade and control the masses.


FINALLY

We were not prepared for the attack on our humanity by "sexual liberation" and porn. We didn't know our leadership had been subverted by the Illuminati.

Marriage and family are the essential building blocks of society. Family ensures that each new generation is properly nurtured and prepared for life. Most people receive values, purpose, identity, and love from their family roles. Heterosexuality provides life with profound meaning. There is no greater potential for love than marriage and parenthood.

Raising a child is the supreme act of devotion and faith in God; and is practiced and tested every day.

Homosexual social engineering is gradually destroying these sources of happiness and health, personal and societal. Porn is creating new generations of heterosexuals who behave like homosexuals. 

---------------------------------

Related-   YouTube - What You Didn't Know About Hugh Hefner 

PLAYBOY and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution 

 "Confessions of a Survivor of the (Homo) Sexual Revolution"

A sex addiction web site.

New York teens turning to Lesbianism


Now, Heterosexuals are in the Closet

| 9 Comments
closet.jpgby Henry Makow Ph.D.

(Updated Nov 27, 2008)

Although 97% of the population is not gay, there is relatively little cultural support for heterosexual institutions (family, motherhood, fatherhood); roles (masculinity and femininity); and life events (courtship, marriage, birth and child rearing.)

Although building a strong family is probably the purpose of life and key to happiness for most, this knowledge is kept under wraps. Millions of dollars are spent to make women find careers but not a dime to become mothers. On the contrary, women who devote their lives to family are criticized.

If you search "heterosexual" in Google, you will get 16 million citations. Search "homosexual" and you get more than 20 million citations, pretty good for 3% of the population. ("Lesbian" got 10 million.)

Per capita "homosexual" received 100 times the citations "heterosexual" got. "Homosexuality" (10.7 million citations) got roughly 11 times the citations of "heterosexuality" (990,000.) Per capita, homosexuality got 3500 times more citations than "heterosexuality."

The fact that the word "heterosexuality" is in rare use is a shocking illustration of the cultural vacuum the non-gay majority inhabits. Our majority "default" status doesn't explain it. In terms of cultural support, non-gays are being starved or as I will suggest later, poisoned.

Another example. There are 21 times as many used books listed with the Advanced Booksellers Exchange under the keyword "homosexuality" as "heterosexuality" (24233 to 1154). Per cap this means there are 6750 references to homosexuality for every one to heterosexuality .

Heterosexuals are being brainwashed to function "on the quiet," "out of the public view," so that we don't "offend" our gay brothers and sisters. There are exceptions but generally speaking our lifestyle and rituals are not celebrated. Instead they are portrayed in a jaundiced way.

On the other hand, homosexual behavior is portrayed as cool and trendy. Kate Perry's "I Kissed a Girl" got more than a million views on YouTube.

Certainly, there is an obsession with male-female sex but mostly in homosexual terms, i.e. promiscuous and anonymous. Heterosexuals are being turned into homosexuals in the sense of being unable to establish a permanent bond with the opposite sex.

Heterosexuality is the basis of the natural life-cycle; it is not a "sexual preference." Non-gays, especially women, are naturally monogamous because heterosexuality ultimately is about procreation.

Heterosexual norms and institutions are routinely ridiculed and affronted in the mass media.

For example, in opening scene of the hit movie, American Wedding, (2003) which is aimed at impressionable teenagers, the future bride performs fellatio on the groom from under a table in a crowded restaurant.

At the wedding reception the groom's unruly friend accidentally has sex with the groom's grandmother in a dark closet. He thought he was making it with the bride's sluttish sister. The grandmother is so satisfied that she removes her objection to her grandson marrying a shiksa. In the final scene, another friend performs cunnilingus on the unruly friend's mother in a bubble bath.

This cultural assault on heterosexual norms is part of a long-term program by the Masonic Jewish financial elite to decrease population, destroy the family and destabilize society.

Far-fetched you say?

The Rockefeller Foundation is funding this campaign. Type in Google "Rockefeller Foundation" and "Women's Studies" and you will get 136,000 entries, many acknowledging support. Type in RF and "homosexual" and you will get 221,000 entries. Type in RF and "heterosexual" and you get only 11,700 entries, mostly in reference to their promotion of homosexuality.

The Rockefeller Foundation is on the vanguard of the elite's efforts to breed a slave race. For almost a century, it has funded research and lobbying designed to control population (the pill, abortion) separate sex from procreation (e.g. the "Sexual Revolution," The Kinsey Report) and destroy the nuclear family.

It has funded the eugenics movement worldwide including Dr. Josef Mengele's experiments on live concentration camp inmates. Ladies, these are the folks who are bringing you feminism. See Rockefeller, Nazis, The UN, & Genocide

The Rockefeller Foundation's agenda is reflected in government, education and the media. It doesn't matter which party you vote for, which TV network you watch, which university you attend. The agenda is the same: the New World Order, not-so-friendly fascism run by the London-based cartel of cartels and their New York branch office.

I have written more than two dozen articles about how heterosexuality works. (See "Cruel Hoax") They resound with many people. Agree or disagree, I haven't had a single interview or mention in the mainstream media. This is not sour grapes. It merely illustrates that our "free and open" society is a fraud. We have freedom of speech. Being heard is another matter.

It is a misunderstanding to think Communism is dead. Communism was always an instrument of the New World Order and still is. See "Wall Street's Utopian Hoax: Communism and the New World Order."

Communism takes many forms, all designed to advance the rule of the  central banking cartel by infiltrating and subverting Western culture and institutions. Feminism is designed to destroy the family (a long-time Communist goal) thereby creating docile and facile people.

"Women's Studies" which originated in Communist Training Schools, is devoted to the indoctrination and psychological neutering of young women at university. They learn that men ("the patriarchy") are the cause of the world's problems. Gender roles and family are social inventions to oppress women. They devote their few precious years of fertility to starting a career instead of a family.

From "Women's Studies" feminist militants fan out to all departments of university and society to act as dreary Rockefeller "change agents" and Commissars. They demand that the record of civilization be recast in terms of women's oppression and research and policy conform to feminist diktat. See "Remove Feminist Professors"

I was expelled from the University of Winnipeg for teaching the work of an unrepentant heterosexual D.H. Lawrence. Meanwhile, two lesbian instructors who showed lesbian porn to high school girls at summer school and told them to use zucchini to satisfy their sexual needs are still teaching. See "Give Back the University of Winnipeg"

I urge you to read Dr. Charles Socarides' book "Homosexuality: A Freedom Too Far" to understand the true nature of homosexuality and the insidious campaign to mainstream it. As a psychiatrist, he treated homosexuals for 40 years. See also "Is this Gay Behavior Sick?"

The cry of "equality," "tolerance" and "diversity" is the classic underhanded Masonic Jewish Communist- elite method of subverting society. They champion some minority whom they portray as victims. They divide and conquer, putting their minority agents in power. They call this "progress" when in fact it is social disintegration and tyranny.

Their claim to champion "equality" is belied by the fact that their proteges far outnumber anyone else per capita. This is about power not justice.

In today's context, "tolerance" etc. really means non-gays must embrace homosexual behavior. This is also seen in their attempt to force schools to adopt "gay friendly" values.

Resistors are typically accused of "hatred" and "intolerance." There is a clear distinction between accepting differences without rancor and not wanting to adopt those differences yourself or to see society subverted.

The continuing assault on heterosexuals is seen in the demand for same sex marriage which is really about redefining and destroying marriage. Few gays want to marry.

Gay adoptions are criminal. Heterosexual children need heterosexual models. So is the policy of Big Brothers to allow gays to mentor fatherless boys. They don't let straight men mentor teenage girls.

Homosexuality is a developmental disorder. The elite's policy is to use it to subvert heterosexuality. I elaborate here.

In conclusion, our political and cultural leaders are sell-outs and frauds that have embraced a collective death wish for society. They think they have sold out to "the corporations." But the corporations mostly belong to one interlocking cartel. This is controlled by people who actually believe in the Occult. Their agenda is to subvert Western Civilization and create a world dictatorship dedicated to Lucifer.

The promotion of homosexuality is designed to weaken us so we will submit to this tyranny. This is behind the lack of cultural support for heterosexuals.

We live in a world where only minorities have identity to undermine the collective interests of the majority. In the Protocols, the author writes, "we shall undermine all collective forces except our own."

We can resist by reaffirming the traditional family and the elements necessary to make it strong.The most important ingredient is strong responsible male leadership and willing resourceful female collaboration and love.

--

No Uproar Over Gay-on-Gay Homocide


Sexual "Liberation" is Illuminati Subversion

| No Comments

Throughout modern history Illuminati bankers have used "sexual liberation" to subvert society and establish their subtle tyranny. As Masonic revolutionary Guiseppe Mazzini said, "we corrupt in order to rule."


19-2-2005

by Henry Makow Ph.D.


The Illuminati bankers need to introduce "world government" to translate their unjust monopoly over credit into total world control.

They realized that they couldn't take control until they destroyed the family. This was a central plank of the Communist Manifesto in 1848.

Every major "revolution" in modern history has increased Illuminati banker control and the sexual revolution is no exception.

The bankers have encouraged sexual dissipation using their various "progressive" fronts: liberalism, feminism, socialism and communism.

The great appeal of left wing movements has always been the lure of "free" sex (i.e. free of the restraints of love & marriage.)

How is free sex subversive?

A healthy society is concerned with its survival and the propagation of its values. This requires that new generations are born and raised in a healthy manner, i.e. in a nuclear family. In a healthy society, women are honored for nurturing and educating the young, a role for which they are naturally suited.

Thus, the bankers set out to undermine and disparage women's role as wives and mothers.

They extolled "sexual liberation" because promiscuous women are less dedicated to family, and less attractive and suitable as wives and mothers. Furthermore, if sex is freely available, men have much less incentive to marry or be faithful .

Women were brainwashed to think they were being "exploited" by their family and should seek fulfillment in career instead.

The bankers used paid subversives like Betty Frieden and Gloria Steinem and the mass media to make it seem that Feminism was a spontaneous occurrence.

At the same time, they severed sex from marriage and procreation and exalted romance as the main source of fulfillment. Hollywood practically has angels singing hosannas when the stars have sex. It created this bogus religion.


THE TRUTH ABOUT SEX


Sex is a natural function like eating food. If we didn't have food, we would think about nothing else.

Because of the gender confusion (caused by Feminism) many people are sex starved and are obsessed with it. As a result, society suffers from arrested development manifested as an obsessive adolescent preoccupation with bodily functions, genitals, pornography and homosexuality.

If we have plenty, we know that divorced from love, "sex is the biggest nothing in the world." (Andy Warhol)

Similarly, romantic love is mostly infatuation based on the expectation of some great advantage (usually sex or security.) I have seen businessmen generate the same kind of heat while making a lucrative deal. But, like AOL-Time Warner, romantic mergers often go sour.

A marriage based on sexual attraction is like a chair with one leg. True love is based on character, personality and trust, tested over a long period of time.


YOUNG WOMEN


The inflated status of fertile young women is another characteristic of our Illuminati-induced dysfunction. These women remind me of poker players recklessly overplaying their hand. They have lost the capacity for love, and sex is a paltry substitute.

Their dependence on their sex appeal is very risky. The shelf life is short and the competition is fierce. Jaded males look at 1000's of practically identical naked women on the Net these days without being turned on.

Increasingly they need drugs to respond and I suspect disgust with women is the unconscious reason. Viagra and Cialis sales are in the billions.

Does it make sense to use these drugs?

Socrates said that when he no longer had a sex drive in old age, he was "released from the jaws of a wild beast." Why would any man take a drug in order to be captive once again?

Hormones generated by the testes cause the male sex drive which takes control of our minds. How powerful are these hormones?

Most young men would agree that their sisters are barely tolerable. However, other men's sisters are an endless source of wonder and fascination.
What's the difference? Sex of course.

Are there harmless drugs that could suppress the production of these mind-altering sex hormones? Perhaps they could be made widely available to young men.

Then women, deprived of their magical spell, could be seen clearly and men could concentrate on something else. When a man falls in love based with a total human being, he could go off the drug.

Of course, a better solution is for men and women to marry (or establish a long-term loving relationship) at a much younger age (i.e. 18-20) like they used to.

People decry marriage because sex declines in importance over time. I thought that was the purpose of marriage.

Sex belongs to an age-and-stage, i.e. courting and procreation. We weren't meant to be obsessed with it for our whole lives. There are much more important and interesting things to do.


CONCLUSION


Modern women are the victim of a monstrous hoax perpetrated by the Illuminati bankers and their lackeys in media, government and education.

Women have been defrauded of a secure and essential social role, that of wife and mother. In exchange they have accepted the role of sex objects and worker drones.

They tart it up with terms like "freedom" and "independence" but many are lonely, bitter and increasingly desperate. They have been cruelly duped by an evil power. Consequently, to varying degrees they have betrayed themselves, their husbands and their children. (I don't object to women pursuing careers, only putting them before family, if indeed they want one.)

Sex is used by the Illuminati as a reductio ad absurdum. Everything good in life, all relationships, culture, love, caring, justice, beauty, and intelligence; is flattened by what has become a sick societal obsession.

The Illuminati use sex to corrupt and debase. The pornography that floods our in-boxes is part of a widespread campaign to degrade us. A morally degraded people are a weak people, and a weak people are easily disinherited.

-----------------------------------

A thorough study of this subject can be found in E. Michael Jones' 650 page book, "Libido Dominandi" Sexual Liberation and Political Control."

See Below "American Women are Bitter"

See also "Managing the Male Sex Drive"

and "Love is Based on Mutual Dependence"

Scroll Down for Reader Comments





Monthly Archives

Pages

  • about
Powered by Movable Type 5.2.13

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from April 2018 listed from newest to oldest.

February 2018 is the previous archive.

June 2018 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.