During my divorce I was threatened with losing custody if I didn't agree to 50/50 custody so he could pay less child support.
I agreed for I feared my husband would hurt me after he exposed me and my unborn child to AIDS without my knowledge through sexual activities
He was a wealthy man and didn't want to let go of control and began a campaign of psychological abuse using my child as a pawn
My 11 year old son reported that his father's gay lover was massaging him in bed with his underwear on, and that he no longer wanted to visit his father's house while this man was there as he gave him the creeps and hated him.
I tried to speak to father, but he said he wanted his son to get used to another man touching him, that it was natural.
My attorney brought this to judge's attention and was immediately shutdown. Judge wrote an order stating I was a liar and she didn't believe anything, and she wouldn't let me or my son testify anymore even though he was 11-years-old.
My son who was a big boy started to have physical fights with his father on his days of visitation as he didn't want to be around his boyfriend
I was called into court on two hours notice while my attorney was out of town, locked in the judges chambers, accused of being crazy. My ex and his three lawyers testified against me, and the judge wouldn't allow me one one word in my defence.
At that point out of sheer desperation and in fear for the damage to my son as his father threatened that if he ever spoke about the massages again, his mother would go to jail and he would be put in foster care I offered to give his father custody as that was the only way I could think of protecting him from his father putting him in foster care or worse.
In the end I wasn't found crazy, but was accused of Parent Alienation, even though the man my son was complaining about wasn't his father, but his gay lover.
The judge told me he was a dictator and didn't have to follow any of the laws of the USA and that my son needed to get used to a homosexual lifestyle, and he then ordered no contact between me and my son.
My son begged me to help him, so we ran away. Bounty hunters were hired; private investigators followed my entire family; all our phones were tapped; my families bank accounts were frozen, and my parents mail was censored through the police before they could receive it.
Finally in Feb 11, 2002 I was placed on FBI 10 most wanted list with Osama bin Laden.
I returned myself and my son after judge was removed from my case for bias, but it was too late, as one judge tried to protect the actions of the other judges.
I admitted to running away with my child "interference with child custody" and was told I could use a defense of necessity.
When it came time for my criminal trial the judge asked jurors back in 2006 if anyone didn't believe in gay marriage, those who didn't were immediately dismissed from my case. Only five women were picked, none of them having children and one man with one child.
The judge never allowed me my defence of necessity as to why I was scared for the life of my child and my life, so without hearing that important evidence or course they had to find me guilty. Again the judge was promoting a homosexual agenda, stating I had no right in deciding how my child should be raised and it was normal for fathers to touch their children sexually.
One of the jurors ended up being the best friend of the gay lover that touched my child, and the judge kept this information hidden from us. I was found guilty and given a 30 month prison sentence.
After everyone left the courtroom the judge told my lawyer and the prosecutor to make a "special deal" with me so that I would give up my appeal. Only after much convincing from my family did I give up my right to appeal. As the judge had legally erred 39 times went to jail for six months, spent four years on house arrest and was denied no contact with my son who kept asking for me.
My case is not unusual. As of this writing 2.2 million moms have been denied primary custody of their children. Many of these moms came from the middle to upper income bracket, were well educated, stay at home moms and had controlling wealthy husbands who were in charge of the finances.
My son testified against me after his father actually put him into foster care in order to make sure my son would be scared to death to tell the truth. Nancy Grace did a small section on this trial, wondering why I was put on trial.
I am a libertarian and if you worry about Obama not following the law, surely this can't be a surprise by now. Little by little our government has been trying it's best to take control over our children. If you think losing your doctor or healthcare is bad, imagine losing your child. This is it folks our government is already starting the practices of Nazi Germany and no one wants to see it.
As my daughter who is a lawyer stated to me, why does Obama care about the children of immigrants and allow them to break the law, but a USA mother who tries to protect her own child no one is willing to ignore the law. Quite the contrary, how dare she buck the government and save her child, what right does she have.
Enclosed is a TV interview. As a Jew I ask you not to ignore this story. How many more children must be devastated, harmed, sexually abused and killed before one person in the media is willing to do an investigative report?
I think our government has reached it's tipping point.
First Comment from David-
Normally I sympathize with fathers, because they're always at a disadvantage in family and divorce courts ("When did you stop beating your wife and molesting your children, sir?"). But when a judge brags in open court that he's a dictator and doesn't have to follow any laws, he ceases to be a judge. He is "waring against the Constitution". Judges have immunity only "during good behavior". He's stepped out of those bounds.
If I were Caren -- and I realize she has many battles to fight and doesn't need another one -- I would find out if the judge is appointed or elected. If appointed then I would get copies of his surety bond, bonding agent and appointment commission. Whatever jurisdiction this "judge" is in, that governing body has to have insurance in force to protect against abuse by its employees, be they judges or janitors. Then I would sue him for breach of surety.