Water-Powered Cars & Inventors Killed

November 21, 2013

Genepax.jpg(Left, Genepax, a Japanese car that can drive at 50km/h for an hour on a liter of water.)


Humanity is being held hostage
by the Illuminati bankers who control
the oil cartel.








"The number one thing that will diffuse the [Illuminati agenda] is to bring in an alternate energy source."




by David Richards
(henrymakow.com)


Water-powered cars have existed for years.

Oil, with its attendant evils - pollution, oil wars, oil spills - are unnecessary.

Water-powered cars have been given scant media coverage. In some cases, the inventors were intimidated into ceasing their work or assassinated.

The Illuminati quash free energy technology because it would transform society and breakdown the economic order. If you control the energy, you control the people.

Stanley Meyer, who invented a water fuel device, encapsulated the agenda: 'The internationalists want zero industrial growth, zero population growth... There is a move to force countries to sign over their natural resource rights, and if you sign over your natural resource rights, they have taken over the countries without even firing a shot. The number one thing that will diffuse the entire episode is to bring in an alternate energy source.'

Most of the cars use water as a source of hydrogen, which is a very efficient fuel.

Here is a list of men and companies who have invented water powered cars.

Herman Anderson 2.pngHerman Anderson (1918-2004) - Herman had an illustrious career as a scientist at NASA testing hydrogen powered rockets. He used this knowledge to create a water-powered vehicle which he believed would transform the world.

Herman created a water powered Chevy Cavalier (left). See Video


He was allowed to drive it, but was banned from selling or manufacturing the vehicle in his home State of Tennessee. The official reason was that the car gave off too much radiation. However, hybrid cars (that use both electricity and oil) produce a similar level of radiation and are legal. Go figure.
 

In 2008, a Japanese company called Genepax unveiled a water-powered car.  They received a patent for the vehicle in Japan and demonstrated it to the press. The car is extremely efficient, able to drive at 50km/h for an hour on a litre of water. It runs on virtually any form of water too, even tea and soda.

A year after the launch Genepax stopped selling the cars due to lack of funds. They currently have a website that explains how to convert your car to run on water. 
 
stanley-meyer-headshot245x3.jpgStanley Meyer (1940-1998) - The most famous water car inventor. The American created the 'water fuel cell', claiming that any car fitted with it could run purely on water.  A local television station filmed him driving a dune buggy powered by the device.

The British Advanced Energy Institute reported, 'We recently sent a delegation to witness Stan's work, to really evaluate it, and came back saying "this is one of the most important inventions of the century."'

In 1998, Stanley was murdered. He and his brother Stephen met two Belgian men at a restaurant who claimed to be potential investors. After drinking a sip of cranberry juice, Stanley grabbed his neck and ran outside, where he was violently sick. Stephen recalls, "I ran outside and asked him, 'What's wrong?'. He said, 'They poisoned me.' That was his dying declaration."

The following day Stephen tracked down the Belgian men. "I told them that Stan had died and they never said a word, absolutely nothing, no condolences, no questions." A week after his death, the Feds came to Stan's home and confiscated his car and research equipment.

 
 steven ryan with motorbike - clip from documentary.jpgSteve Ryan's water powered motorcycle - In 2005,  "60 Minutes" featured the inventor Steve Ryan demonstrating his water-powered motorbike. The footage shows Ryan fueling the bike with just water and then driving it 50mph along a highway.

Ryan's firm, BiosFuel were planning to sell motorbikes with the conversions in them. However, the company went quiet before announcing, 'Due to political and economical reasons, we are unable to sell the motorcycles.'
 
The Joe Cell - An Australian man, only identified by the name of Joe "X", has designed an Energy Cell that utilizes water for a fuel.

Unlike the other devices that use water as a source of hydrogen, The Joe Cell uses electrically-charged water as the "gate" or medium through which to draw a special kind of energy from the atmosphere. The existence of this free energy (termed the 'ether') is denied by orthodox science but adhered to by alternative scientists like Nikola Tesla. Ken Adachi explains in detail how The Joe Cell works.

Joe's experiments with various prototypes of his Energy Cell were recorded on amateur videos recorded in Australia from 1993-1997.

Joe X was the victim of threats and harassment that succeeded in stopping him talking. However other researchers have taken his videos and manuals and tried to build the device.

A man called Bill Williams studied the tutorials and claimed that he was able to power his truck using the fuel cell. He shared his findings with a group of fellow enthusiasts online. He explained in detail how he was intimidated into stopping his research:

In 2006, Bill posted this on the group: "I was standing in front of my truck, and this late model 2005 or 2006 Ford Explorer pulled up and parked diagonally in front of my truck.

"The driver got out of the rig and approached me. At about the same time, the passenger opened his door. The driver stated that they wanted me to stop working on all forms of alternative energy. He also stated that we know everything about me, my family, and all my projects past and present.

"At about that time the passenger reached and held up a file that was about 2 or so inches thick. He opened it up and showed me telephone transcripts, emails, messages from the groups that I had belonged to. They knew where my kids worked, the times they are at work; also my wife's working hours, my grandkids' school, etc. They knew everything.

"The driver said that if I did not stop working on this (he then opened up the left side of his jacket and showed his weapon that was holstered) that there would be other consequences. He also stated that he wanted me to post that I was no longer working in this field and to destroy all my work, i.e. cells, drawings, lab journals, everything!"

After a few days of contemplation, Bill decided to abide by the demands: "I thought I was strong but when illness to the family comes into play, I have failed. I am truly sorry. I will not be working in any form of alternative energy field anymore. I destroyed my device tonight along with my written data and lab notes."

CONCLUSION

We are complicit in the suppression of free energy technologies. The truth is right in front of our faces: a quick YouTube search pulls up MANY videos of water powered cars.

If we want free energy we need to stand behind the inventors. As Stanley Meyer once told an audience, 'If me and you could come together in accord, no political institution in the word, no multinationalist groups could defeat us.' 
 
-----------

Related-

In 1917, John Andrew demonstrated this to the United States Department of the Navy. Accused of being a fraud by the investigating commission, he put a few drops of a crystal-clear concentrate into ten litres of both freshwater and sea water and challenged the investigators to test the mixture in an internal combustion engine. Boiling with indignation, he then left the test laboratory. When the test motor started, the significance of this ideal source of power became quite apparent. A subsequent search for the inventor found him murdered in his living room. from   Inventors of Water-Powered Cars

Car Got 100 miles per gal- Inventor Murdered



Additional Information from Dan:

"The Water Engine" is a radio drama by David Mamet, later made into a film.  Written in 1976, Mamet set the story at the time of the 1933 Chicago's World's Fair.[1]   Based on the composite of stories of independent inventors, Mamet shows the standard procedures used to suppress inventions that threaten the monopolies of power. Synopsis - a lowly machinist working in an factory makes a working prototype of a water power engine in his spare time.  He merely wants to sell it to the corporation so he can retire.   What hasn't occurred to him is that the corps don't want a free-fuel engine. Worse, they can't let the world find out that it's even possible.


[1]  Mamet chose the 1933 Chicago's World's Fair as the background meme for the play because is is famous for it's 'World of the Future' promises of solving all problems through technology - in the future!  Sponsored by the big monopolies of the time of course: General Motors, General Electric, IBM, AT&T, DuPont and Dow Chemical, etc.
We're aware that public will never know that a free-fuel engine had already been invented, the world would never hear of the ill-fated inventor or his invention.

One must wonder why the TV movie version was broadcast on Illuminatus Ted Turner's network.   Is it 'revelation of the method' to discourage people from 'getting any ideas'?

The Water Engine (1992 TV movie) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105788/

Johnson 1921 small.gifLeft, 1921 Johnson rotary steam turbine automobile engine.



First Comment by David K:

If Stan Meyer had not been so greedy and tried to get patents for his invention he could still be alive and the world could be a different place. Imagine instead he put detailed and precise plans out on the internet so anyone could build the device? Hundreds of companies could have started manufacturing it and individuals could have built it themselves and not even told the authorities they had one. If the plans spread on the net fast enough the Illuminati would have been powerless to stop it. And think about it, if he put the plans out there and simply stated "anyone who uses these plans to make money please send 10% of net profit to me", he would have still become filthy rich.

Maybe in his day this would have still been dangerous as everyone would know who he is but now with bitcoins someone could do this and remain completely anonymous, get their money, save the world and live happily ever after. Hopefully we will see something like this happen one day. People making these kinds of inventions need to try to remain anonymous... Do not go on television showing off your invention, put it out on the net with detailed plans and stay anonymous.

Now talking about bitcoins and other crypto coins for that matter, this could seriously be our hope of getting away from Illuminati control. If we all start using bitcoins we can trade without tax and with complete anonymity across the planet. And if you look at the fact that there is a limited number of bitcoins and all cryptos to be found and the world economy is growing and more people are finding out about bitcoins its not hard to see that the value can and will continue to grow for a very long time. In January this year bitcoins sold for $13 and today they sell for around $700 and it is sure that they will continue to rise. Anyone who wants freedom from the Illuminati needs to get on the Bitcoins and Litecoins and Feather coins etc. It is the way of the future. It may not be an ideal solution but there is currently nothing else even close to crypto currencies in potential for freeing up the economy to move away from Illuminati control.


Jim Perloff:


This article is spot-on. Many American conservatives continue to live under the illusion that their country is a land of unbridled free enterprise, where "any boy can get to be President" and any idea, if ingenious and pursued with hard work, will succeed.  This is not the case.  Few people or ideas will rise to the top without Illuminati approval.  I learned this the hard way a few years ago when I--believing in the "land of free enterprise" myself-- invested in a small company that had developed a genuinely revolutionary product, only to see it killed when no capital would support it. There are many parallels to this article--in medicine, for example, where developers of cancer cures have been suppressed and/or assassinated. Free enterprise is allowed to thrive only in certain approved areas--such as software technology, because the Illuminati want us to move into a surveillance age where are all money and information will become digital.



 

Comments for " Water-Powered Cars & Inventors Killed "

Joyce said (November 22, 2013):

It is true that oil is one of the cartels enriching the "elite" , who I prefer to call the Parasites.
But there are other cartels, such as the medical-pharmaceutical cartel, the big agriculture cartel, etc.

All of these cartels are but symptoms of the true disease, which is the paper fiat money cartel. All we have to do to take away the power of the parasites is to declare all their money and credit worthless. After all, it has no more value than their first product; snake oil.


Doug P said (November 22, 2013):

I'm skeptical about this article. The one guy who said a member of the illuminati drove up and merely threatened him to stop working on his projects ? What would stop them from burning his house down with his family in it, his notes, his workshop, all his science buddies homes and their familiesand in it to destroy all traces - if what the alternative science folks are saying is true, certainly they are a big enough threat to justify that. They have done far worse for far less.

But, most importantly, the by-products of a typical fuel burning reaction are CO2, water, some carbon monoxide which is hot and light and goes straight up, bonds with ozone and comes back down as beautiful CO2. Fuel is cheap, they just tax and regulate the hell out of it. There is no end to the supply of oil. Tax the additives out of fuel and you have a clean beautiful cheap and virtually unlimited source of power.

People that make rockets don't even fool around with that stuff - too unstable. I hope ordinary people don't get ideas of fooling around with stuff most science people would be afraid of.

World war two piston planes had a War Emergency Power feature that had water going into the engine. I bet there are lots of people around that laugh at all this the way I laugh at some audio technologies.

I always vote that we should stay firmly grounded in reality and on undisputable well known proof and avoid all forms of speculation. We can still win in the court of public opinion, maybe one day we can have a population that understands what the law is. If we had that we would real courts of law and win tomorrow. We have enough evidence to bring down the illuminati without risking the use of reputation destroying untested speculation. Lets get out of the faith arena - it doesn't belong in science, most of what people know about science is really faith. Funny how they replace real faith with science too - get us thinking we are monkeys which isn't scientific at all.

There are a million ways to bend reason. You can bet they are using every single one of them.


James T-1 said (November 22, 2013):

I appreciate that many folks are saying exactly what should be done, that the plans etc. shouldn't be shared with anyone except the general
public, and widely so, but there are a couple of problems I would like to call attention to:

1. Even if detailed plans were released to the public, unless it can be easily made from material available at wal-mart with minimum
effort, it likely won't be built except by a minority of motor heads,eccentrics, and survivalists, because the bulk of people have been
trained to be slothful and rely on nanny government for everything.

Radioshack and other stores have been neutered over the past couple of decades to the point where actual invention from the materials
available are slim to none, if it takes any degree of trouble or special ordering of parts, the general public likely won't want to
build it, and won't want to understand building it. This isn't to discourage anyone from doing so, on the contrary, I'd like to see a
water enegine etc. spread uncontrolled, but this is to call attention to the reality that the general public has been made functionally
mentally disabled.


James T -2 said (November 22, 2013):

2. Bitcoins et al are *not* so decentralized as people think, and are already controlled currency... how? Because bitcoins are simply
magnetic data, they can and will vanish in crashes or power outages, and thus be irretrievable (I had a friend who lost three bitcoins due to such a technical issue), thus those who control the Electricity
will control bitcoins. I personally think the bitcoins will be utilized as a weapon, both to steal from those that invest in them and
leave them with little or nothing (since the coins have no presence in the real world, nor any real value in the same) as well as a larger
means of economic control, possibly utilized in a final stage crash to bring down the present economic model (and any vestige of good that
was part of it) or to make crashes at will. People would do better to invest in Books on how to do/make/repair items/things and gain skills
(such as making clean potable water), as well as practical value resources (think beeswax etc.) rather than worthless rocks or yellow
metal, which are worth far more than any wad of ugly yellow metal or ephemeral mirage of magnetic data that can be there one moment and
gone the next.

That said, it would be nice if inventors would keep vaulted copies of their research and documentation, not in a hard drive, nor a metal
safe, but in someplace only they know where to look. If good men cease doing good because they are bullied, then how can we expect to
have any good come about?


Art Granda said (November 22, 2013):

JG says below,

"The Petro Dollar is the World Currency of today, and will continue to be, as long as the House of Rothchild deems it necessary for fiscal control of the world. The only way oil will be replaced as the world's primary energy source is if this new source of energy is monopolized and under their control. And don't look for this to happen anytime in the near future."


100% agree. As it turns out, we do indeed live in a Matrix not too unlike the movie.

From the science of the 80's and 90's we weren't expected to be driving around burning gasoline in the 2000's. We still do, the same way we did in the 50s … by a relatively inefficient internal combustion engine.

How many of us sit at ridiculous traffic signals with not a single vehicle crossing the green light side of the intersection? It's maddening in 2013 with tech permeating every crevice of society to be forced into ZERO miles per gallon sitting at useless lights. Who benefits from all this? (big oil)

These days .. 28 mpg on the highway is considered good for a full size pickup truck (for instance). Believe it or not, that same truck was getting 36 mpg on the highway in the 80's with a normally aspirated engine (carburetor). My late 70's air cooled VW super beetle easily managed 45+ mpg on the highway, lets see VW match that today.

In 50 years we'll be "jacked in" to our cars via implantable microchips, the Goog will be driving us everywhere … and below it all will be an internal combustion engine chugging gas at the rate of a whopping 7 mpg!!!


Adrian said (November 22, 2013):

The Japanese web site is selling kits and books. There is not a single reference from satisfied customers.

Not one of these "inventors", when faced with “persecution”, published their “secret sauce”, condemning humanity to a world minus “free
energy”!!!

This means they were either all scams or all fueled by terrible greed placed before the suffering of billions due to energy poverty.

In either case, best to be avoided.


Paul said (November 22, 2013):

Like most people in urban areas, I keep seeing more and more electric cars on the road, and I really have the question the wisdom of moving from petroleum to electricity for automobiles. The electric grid is already overtaxed as it is, is prone to failure during storm or earthquake (vide the Midwest this week) and is powered largely either by coal or nuclear energy, both of which are highly "un-renewable".

I know you have readers who will take issue with this, but there's convincing evidence (if you dig for it) that the oil cartels have known for a long time that petroleum reserves are in fact renewable. An analogy I hear used frequently is that true origin of petroleum is rather like honey from a hive of honeybees: if you take it, the bees will produce more to replenish what was taken.

Petroleum is obviously not the best source of energy, it's dirty and (to use a metaphor) if "God" put it down there in the earth, it's probably there for a good reason. By pumping so much of it up to the surface, we're probably doing damage to Earth's ecosystem in ways we don't even begin to appreciate. But renewable or not, there is still plenty of petroleum to go around, and moving to something that's genuinely scarce, like coal or uranium, doesn't seem like a step in the right direction.


ZZ said (November 21, 2013):

As always indomitable. You got it right. The water electrolyse [water fuel cells] works! You can check it yourself, mounting a simple device in your car [diesel or gas], adding electrolysed water to the fuel [before the injection pump] and thus reduce the fuel consumption by 20%. The rig is approved and many trucks, public transport and even police cars run on it in usa.

But to the topic. There are a multitude of disinfo agents and crooks out there. There are a variety of patents granted for a multitude of unconventional power generators, I checked it personally. It is all correct. BUT: if you want to do anything in the field yourself, you will meet first disinfo, than crooks and then secret service on your path.

We have here a very bright guy, machinery engineer, he built a revolutionary car safety bumper, with energy retrieval. Wanted to patent it. Denied. All his work confiscated and he lost a couple of years for legal battles. Finally sold his patent abroad.

If you really want to make a difference, announce on your site FREE UNIVERSAL PUBLICATION, TRAINING AND SUPPORT FOR ALL FREE ENERGY DISCOVERIES AND APPLIANCES under only one condition: the author supplies complete technical documentation plus working proof of concept that it works plus the licence for distribution [anonymous preferably].

It won't work otherwise. It should be in public domain, free. All freelancers will be crushed or killed and you have no time to spare for crooks. If there is a legitimate free energy inventor out there - please speak up. Give your invention for free, otherwise it will come to nought. For crooks and businessmen I do not have time presently. Businessmen they drink my wine, come and dig my earth. There must be some kind of a way out of here..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLV4_xaYynY


JG said (November 21, 2013):

Throughout recent years alternative energy has been allowed to exist, but under strict control.
People who do own electronic cars get a tax bill from the government annually to compensate for lost tax revenue at the pump.

Solar energy is making a comeback but will never be "state of the art" for new home manufacturing. It also will never be coded in to law as being mandatory for builders.

Alternative fuels are also here but under control. Your car can now burn "flex fuel corn" instead of "unleaded" for about 40 cents a gallon cheaper but you also loose 5 miles per gallon on the road in the process. This cancels out it's value.

The Petro Dollar is the World Currency of today, and will continue to be, as long as the House of Rothchild deems it necessary for fiscal control of the world. The only way oil will be replaced as the world's primary energy source is if this new source of energy is monopolized and under their control. And don't look for this to happen anytime in the near future.


Cara said (November 21, 2013):

I noted that the article said a direct hit to the "iiluminati" would be finding a different energy source. Well, every, single thing that we get from black oil, we could get from hemp. Now there is no wonder why marijuana and hemp are still, very much public enemy number 1. Not only would it wake people up, but if used industrially, it would free us from "the man" in every aspect. Something which "they" quite obviously know and do not want.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at