Illuminati Jews Still Covering for 1980's Satanism

March 13, 2013

220px-TheMcMartinTrial.jpgIn the 1980s, the McMartin family, who operated a preschool in California, were charged with hundreds of acts of sexual abuse of children.When the trial ended with no convictions in 1990, it was the longest & most expensive criminal trial in American history. Hollywood and the mass media portrayed the case as "mass hysteria over imaginary Satanic ritual abuse." Believe what we tell you; not what you see. That's how Cabalism works.


Indictment: The McMartin Trial, rebroadcast on Hebrew Box Office Wednesday, casts the abusers as the victims: John J. O'Connor, writing for The New York Times: "This is a portrait of mass hysteria, fueled by panic-stricken parents, overzealous prosecutors, irresponsible talk shows and an out-of-control tabloid press..."Is Indictment balanced? Is it fair to the other side? No. As [writer] Mr. [Abby] Mann puts it, "What other side?" Watch it and shudder."

The film is cited as a watershed in the shift of ideas about satanic ritual abuse in the United States, recasting [McMartin teacher] Ray Buckey as a victim of a hysterical conspiracy rather than a child abuser.


Bob Constantine: "Oliver Stone, took to the bandwagon with a film made for HBO, written by Abby Mann, theorizing that hysteria in Manhattan Beach CA was kindled when one child returned home from school one afternoon with "a red bottom" -- this would be the son of Judy Johnson, and he hadn't been spanked -- he was bleeding from the anus."



Read this article in conjunction with "Incest Survivor Exposed Illuminati Satanism"  - We have a pattern of satanic ritual abuse practiced by Illuminati Jews and their cohorts, and covered up by the mass media. In essence, the Illuminati Jewish mass media has indoctrinated Americans to believe satanic ritual abuse of children is a figment of parents' imagination.

First Comment below: "Judges, police, and even other psychologists were involved in the Satanic activity the kids reported."


By Bob Constantine
McMartin Preschool Revisited
(edited & abridged by henrymakow.com)


But why should certain members of the corporate press, and segments of the legal and psychiatric professions, go to such lengths to suppress evidence of organized child abuse at McMartin?

 The traumatic crimes reported by the toddlers bear an uncanny resemblance to mind control programming, a specialty of certain classified federal agencies and cult cut-outs on the black budget payroll.

nursery.jpgThe children are often ridiculed because some of their charges are impossible. Tunnels under the preschool? Too ludicrous to consider. But as it happens, there were tunnels, confirmed in 1993 by a team of five scientists from leading universities. The unearthing of the tunnels, like much of the critical evidence, never made it to the courtroom. They have been discreetly excluded from newspaper accounts.

 Filling the void, Debbie Nathan, a widely published skeptic of ritual abuse, heaped ridicule on the tunnel allegations in the Village Voice in June 1990. She maintained the McMartin site had already been "painstakingly probed for tunnels. None were found." Nathan's account is a fabrication.

 In fact, recalls Dr. Roland Summit, who contributed to the final report on the tunnel excavation, parents started digging and prosecutors, reluctantly forced to a showdown, "commissioned a superficial search of open terrain." District Attorney Ira Reiner then declared the tunnel stories unfounded "without going under the concrete floor of the preschool."

 "Experts" courted by the press snaffled at the suggestion that animals were killed to frighten children at McMartin and other preschools around the country. It was not until 1993 that a study by the National Center for Child Abuse and Neglect confirmed that children are not only threatened in day care settings, "most threats are very specific in terms of what the consequence of disclosure will be and how the threat will be carried out.... The use of such severe threats is obviously quite frightening to young children and is effective in preventing disclosure. In fact, it appears that threats used in day care center cases may go beyond what is usually needed to silence victims, and may in some instances be made for purposes of psychological terror in and of itself."13

tunnels.jpg(left, digging for tunnels)

Most reporters in Southern California pooh-poohed evidence of coercion, but there was a great, gaping silence when the tunnels were found. "I asked my daughter," recalls Jackie MacGauley, a mother of two children who attended the preschool, "'How could they have taken you to these places without being seen?' And she answered me as though I was silly to ask such a question. She said, 'Through the tunnels, of course.'"

The Los Angeles Times ran a spate of features poking fun of the excavation team until actual evidence of tunnels was discovered. Then the Times  ran a brief news item, one paragraph long, dryly noting that "evidence" of tunnels had been found, and never mentioned the subject again. The local Beach Reporter covered the story without a blush: "parents began to dig with shovels, allegedly in an area pointed out by a nine-year-old former student of the McMartin preschool, who told them to dig behind a cement planter in the northeast corner. When parents unearthed several broken turtle shells and a few bones, they stopped digging and notified the district attorney's office."15

Once the entrance was exposed, Stickel used remote sensing equipment to read the terrain conductivity of the empty lot next to the preschool. The survey was conducted by a respected geophysicist, Robert Beer, working with an electromagnetic scanner. The tunnel opening was found precisely where children said it would be.

That's the moment editors at the Times chose to pull reporters off the story. All other news outlets rapidly followed suit. But the excavators cleared the foreign soil and followed the tunnel anyway...

A total of 77 animal bones were found buried at the McMartin site, an assortment of the osteo-remains of domestic cattle, chickens, dogs and a single rabbit.17

nathan.jpgHowever, Debbie Nathan, left, the hide-bound "skeptic" of ritual abuse, a scion of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation, told another story. The McMartin site, she insisted, had already been "painstakingly probed for tunnels" by the D.A.'s office. (Not so, as we've seen). "None were found. [The McMartin] parents have invested years believing in demonic conspiracies and underground nursery tunnels. (Until recently the parents were still digging. They came up with Indian artifacts)." No mention of Bynum's independent findings. No mention of the dig as it happened in the real world. She reserves much of her scorn for former FBI agent Ted Gunderson and Jackie MacGauley.

Nathan seems not to realize that Gunderson and MacGauley brought in Stickel and his geological team to defuse accusations they were directly engaged in the dig. They weren't. The search for the tunnels was independent, and scores of volunteers pitched in.

Nathan's refrain of "no evidence" is hollow. She has been known to contort around the facts of ritual abuse in a grotesque parody of journalism and is frequently blind to critical evidence. Nathan continues to find "no evidence" of abuse at McMartin despite the nightmares, the acting-out, medical molestation reports and sexual infections. The tunnel excavation, she assures with psychic certainty (and a sniff of condescension), is a "hoax." To come to the point: Nathan's propaganda, repeated in the New York Times and a host of other corporate publications, happened to conceal a classified mind control operation the CIA and Pentagon had undertaken thirty years before....

----

mcmartin.jpg(left, Virginia McMartin during trial)

Feb 5/2004

THE MCMARTIN PRESCHOOL CASE WAS NOT A HOAX!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My daughter attended the McMartin Preschool 20 years ago. She was 2 and a half. She is now 22.

In the Spring of 1990 a group of parents gained access to the preschool property and decided to look for tunnels the children had described. Many children said they were taken into tunnels under the school, abused, and transported away from the property into the community.

I still live here in Manhattan Beach.

There were hundreds of families who filed police reports and 42 families whose children were chosen to testify.

I hired an archaeologist and he and his team uncovered 3 sections of tunnels directly under the preschool building foundation. The fact that tunnels were found was reported in the news.

A year later I commissioned a formal report. I arranged to pay the archaeologist $3,000 to write the formal report, $1000 in donations, $1000 from Gloria Steinem and $1,000 from me.
I contacted many publishers. No one would publish it.

Technology has changed since then and publishing is not the major expense it used to be. I have had copies made at my own expense and sent them out on request, but I cannot do this on a large scale.

I am disabled and have no other income than Social Security. I had to file bankruptcy in 1993 because of a carpetbagger X FBI con man who embezzled $30,000 from me.

Since then the group False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF) has said "there are no tunnels." This false statement is repeated often by anyone researching the trial.

THIS REPORT NEEDS TO BE OUT THERE!

Hundreds of children are being called liars. This untruth is used DAILY to "prove" children are simply LIARS. It is used to set pedophiles free!

Sadistic (ritual) abuse DID happen at the McMartin Preschool!

If you are a parent or someone who cares about the safety of children, please contact me about getting this report published!
I don't want to make money on this. I just want the truth out there!!! Please copy this plea and distribute it widely.

Thank you for your help!

Sincerely,
Jackie McGauley

Interview with Jackie McGauley

CIA and Satanism -

The Franklin Scandal

Related - by William Ramsey

Liberals Liberate Child Killers - West Memphis Three

 Hollywood and Mas media Covers Up West Memphis Three Satanist Killers

1974 Satanic Ritual Murder Still Unresolved


First Comment by S:


I realize this is anecdotal, but I grew up not far from Manhattan Beach, CA.  When I was in high school (in the early- to mid-1980s), my best friend's dad was a child psychologist who was involved with treating some of the victims involved in the McMartin preschool case early on.   Though he did not go into too much detail and he only spoke to me about it once, I very clearly remember that he told us that the case was much bigger than was being reported, and that judges, police, and even other psychologists were involved in the Satanic activity the kids reported.  He lamented that the professionals working ostensibly on behalf of the kids in fact had their own agenda, and were doing further damage to them.  I remember he was worried that, if he were to tell the truth, it could ruin him or worse, but that he couldn't live with himself if he aided in the cover up.

The McMartin case was one of my earliest encounters with the duplicitous nature of what is often presented as "news".  Before the Internet, it was very difficult to obtain perspectives that differed from the dominant one presented by the media, and other than combing through stacks at some dusty university library, the general public had only "nonfiction" exposes such as  Jeffery Victor's  "Satanic Panic" to rely upon. 




Comments for "Illuminati Jews Still Covering for 1980's Satanism "

Dan said (March 14, 2013):

The only "Illuminati Jews" involved in what the media now routinely laugh off as 'Satanic Panic' of the 1980's were involved in the coverup - the Satanic network perps were predominantly Naziphile Satanists embedded in military intelligence. They were enabled under aegis of National Security, based on the totalitarian logic that politicians must be blackmailed lest they interfere with State Department policies.

I was there, and I can assure you 'Satanic Panic' was a coverup ploy that worked only with massive help from news networks and Hollywood.
What we actually witnessed was a very real Satanic Tsunami.


Kristine said (March 14, 2013):

There is no mention in the report about the McMartin case of Lieutenant Colonel Dr. Michael Aquino, a self-proclaimed satanist, now allegedly dead. He was named by Paul Bonacci as the ring-leader of child-kidnappings (see > Johnny Gosch) and porn-rings specializing in snuff-films. This high-ranking Army man was one of the inventors of psychological operations. He was treasured by the US elite.

It is more or less a fact that all military bases in the United States are connected by a vast tunnel systems served by trains that can achieve a speed of up to 1,000 mph. That these tunnels lead to amongst other institutions hospitals, churches and day care centers is also a well-known fact. Somehow, though, the perps of these crimes against humanity always manage to deny proven facts through "plausible denial" and stupid people who cannot bear the truth believe them.

One big problem is that those who are courageous enough to step up to the plate for the children (for example) and tell the truth often "die" suddenly (http://de.scribd.com/doc/31856111/Child-Abuse-sanctioned-Mae-Brussel-and-Michael-Aquino); the "authorities" are all in league with one another and therefore justice will never be served until Judgement Day.


Bill said (March 14, 2013):

Why is it that I can find no pictures documenting what the archeologist found at the McMartin pre-school? Something stinks here and you have no documentation to speak of. There is no question that kids were abused! But if you are going to write an articles please link it to substance. Without archeology pictures the discoveries in my mind the tunnels are a mute point and should not be discussed. So much evidence could have been brought to bear if it was documented with pictures and explanations.

I looked and looked for pictures on the internet, guess what? I could not find ONE! If in fact the parents did spend that much money looking for evidence you should fine hundreds of photos indicting these scoundrels from hell. If it was my kid I would have plastered the internet with the findings and used hundreds of picture Hummmmm............

--
Bill

You make an excellent point. I have emailed Jackie about this. Only explanation I can think of is that this case ended in failure in 1990 and the Internet didn't take off until 7-8 years later, when the central participants may have been intimidated or given up for other reasons.

Henry



Al Thompson said (March 14, 2013):

These bastards are the biggest assholes on the face of the earth and this is why I think government is the most worthless enterprise on the
planet. My thinking is that the local cops and politcal bums were in on it.

Wayne Satz was the main reporter on it, and I noticed a similar situation in Huntington Beach California and when I brought it up to law enforcement, then just passed the buck and put me on a merry-go-round. I called Wayne Satz at ABC Eyewitness News and I told him what I was observing, and he told me that his mind could not bear another story like this one. He profusely apologized but he said he couldn't take anymore. Then, a few years later, he passed away allegedly from a heart attack.

The wrath of God is coming upon child molesters, it isn't a matter of time, it is just when it is going to happen. This kind of behavior comes back and spills over on everyone.

In my opinion, all government people are pieces of shit because they support such an evil system; and so are the people who vote for them.

And the tolerance for fornication is helping to feed child molesting. So when people pander to fornicators or homosexuals they are feeding
the beast of child molestation. Sorry, but I vividly remember this case and I had my own experience with "law enforcement." I almost
vomit whenever I see some guy in his freaking ice cream suit (police) who protects the thug judges or lawyers.

Government has no authority for anything and they never deserved it. No government is better than what we have now.

http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2012/07/pandering-to-homosexuals.html


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at