Illuminati Jews Still Covering for 1980's Satanism
March 13, 2013
Indictment: The McMartin Trial, rebroadcast on Hebrew Box Office Wednesday, casts the abusers as the victims: John J. O'Connor, writing for The New York Times: "This is a portrait of mass hysteria, fueled by panic-stricken parents, overzealous prosecutors, irresponsible talk shows and an out-of-control tabloid press..."Is Indictment balanced? Is it fair to the other side? No. As [writer] Mr. [Abby] Mann puts it, "What other side?" Watch it and shudder."
The film is cited as a watershed in the shift of ideas about satanic ritual abuse in the United States, recasting [McMartin teacher] Ray Buckey as a victim of a hysterical conspiracy rather than a child abuser.
Bob Constantine: "Oliver Stone, took to the bandwagon with a film made for HBO, written by Abby Mann, theorizing that hysteria in Manhattan Beach CA was kindled when one child returned home from school one afternoon with "a red bottom" -- this would be the son of Judy Johnson, and he hadn't been spanked -- he was bleeding from the anus."
Read this article in conjunction with "Incest Survivor Exposed Illuminati Satanism" - We have a pattern of satanic ritual abuse practiced by Illuminati Jews and their cohorts, and covered up by the mass media. In essence, the Illuminati Jewish mass media has indoctrinated Americans to believe satanic ritual abuse of children is a figment of parents' imagination.
First Comment below: "Judges, police, and even other psychologists were involved in the Satanic activity the kids reported."
By Bob Constantine
McMartin Preschool Revisited (edited & abridged by henrymakow.com)
But why should certain members of the corporate press, and segments of the legal and psychiatric professions, go to such lengths to suppress evidence of organized child abuse at McMartin?
The traumatic crimes reported by the toddlers bear an uncanny resemblance to mind control programming, a specialty of certain classified federal agencies and cult cut-outs on the black budget payroll.
The children are often ridiculed because some of their charges are impossible. Tunnels under the preschool? Too ludicrous to consider. But as it happens, there were tunnels, confirmed in 1993 by a team of five scientists from leading universities. The unearthing of the tunnels, like much of the critical evidence, never made it to the courtroom. They have been discreetly excluded from newspaper accounts.
Filling the void, Debbie Nathan, a widely published skeptic of ritual abuse, heaped ridicule on the tunnel allegations in the Village Voice in June 1990. She maintained the McMartin site had already been "painstakingly probed for tunnels. None were found." Nathan's account is a fabrication.
In fact, recalls Dr. Roland Summit, who contributed to the final report on the tunnel excavation, parents started digging and prosecutors, reluctantly forced to a showdown, "commissioned a superficial search of open terrain." District Attorney Ira Reiner then declared the tunnel stories unfounded "without going under the concrete floor of the preschool."
"Experts" courted by the press snaffled at the suggestion that animals were killed to frighten children at McMartin and other preschools around the country. It was not until 1993 that a study by the National Center for Child Abuse and Neglect confirmed that children are not only threatened in day care settings, "most threats are very specific in terms of what the consequence of disclosure will be and how the threat will be carried out.... The use of such severe threats is obviously quite frightening to young children and is effective in preventing disclosure. In fact, it appears that threats used in day care center cases may go beyond what is usually needed to silence victims, and may in some instances be made for purposes of psychological terror in and of itself."13
(left, digging for tunnels)
Most reporters in Southern California pooh-poohed evidence of coercion, but there was a great, gaping silence when the tunnels were found. "I asked my daughter," recalls Jackie MacGauley, a mother of two children who attended the preschool, "'How could they have taken you to these places without being seen?' And she answered me as though I was silly to ask such a question. She said, 'Through the tunnels, of course.'"
The Los Angeles Times ran a spate of features poking fun of the excavation team until actual evidence of tunnels was discovered. Then the Times ran a brief news item, one paragraph long, dryly noting that "evidence" of tunnels had been found, and never mentioned the subject again. The local Beach Reporter covered the story without a blush: "parents began to dig with shovels, allegedly in an area pointed out by a nine-year-old former student of the McMartin preschool, who told them to dig behind a cement planter in the northeast corner. When parents unearthed several broken turtle shells and a few bones, they stopped digging and notified the district attorney's office."15
Once the entrance was exposed, Stickel used remote sensing equipment to read the terrain conductivity of the empty lot next to the preschool. The survey was conducted by a respected geophysicist, Robert Beer, working with an electromagnetic scanner. The tunnel opening was found precisely where children said it would be.
That's the moment editors at the Times chose to pull reporters off the story. All other news outlets rapidly followed suit. But the excavators cleared the foreign soil and followed the tunnel anyway...
A total of 77 animal bones were found buried at the McMartin site, an assortment of the osteo-remains of domestic cattle, chickens, dogs and a single rabbit.17
However, Debbie Nathan, left, the hide-bound "skeptic" of ritual abuse, a scion of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation, told another story. The McMartin site, she insisted, had already been "painstakingly probed for tunnels" by the D.A.'s office. (Not so, as we've seen). "None were found. [The McMartin] parents have invested years believing in demonic conspiracies and underground nursery tunnels. (Until recently the parents were still digging. They came up with Indian artifacts)." No mention of Bynum's independent findings. No mention of the dig as it happened in the real world. She reserves much of her scorn for former FBI agent Ted Gunderson and Jackie MacGauley.
Nathan seems not to realize that Gunderson and MacGauley brought in Stickel and his geological team to defuse accusations they were directly engaged in the dig. They weren't. The search for the tunnels was independent, and scores of volunteers pitched in.
Nathan's refrain of "no evidence" is hollow. She has been known to contort around the facts of ritual abuse in a grotesque parody of journalism and is frequently blind to critical evidence. Nathan continues to find "no evidence" of abuse at McMartin despite the nightmares, the acting-out, medical molestation reports and sexual infections. The tunnel excavation, she assures with psychic certainty (and a sniff of condescension), is a "hoax." To come to the point: Nathan's propaganda, repeated in the New York Times and a host of other corporate publications, happened to conceal a classified mind control operation the CIA and Pentagon had undertaken thirty years before....
(left, Virginia McMartin during trial)
THE MCMARTIN PRESCHOOL CASE WAS NOT A HOAX!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My daughter attended the McMartin Preschool 20 years ago. She was 2 and a half. She is now 22.
In the Spring of 1990 a group of parents gained access to the preschool property and decided to look for tunnels the children had described. Many children said they were taken into tunnels under the school, abused, and transported away from the property into the community.
I still live here in Manhattan Beach.
There were hundreds of families who filed police reports and 42 families whose children were chosen to testify.
I hired an archaeologist and he and his team uncovered 3 sections of tunnels directly under the preschool building foundation. The fact that tunnels were found was reported in the news.
A year later I commissioned a formal report. I arranged to pay the archaeologist $3,000 to write the formal report, $1000 in donations, $1000 from Gloria Steinem and $1,000 from me.
I contacted many publishers. No one would publish it.
Technology has changed since then and publishing is not the major expense it used to be. I have had copies made at my own expense and sent them out on request, but I cannot do this on a large scale.
I am disabled and have no other income than Social Security. I had to file bankruptcy in 1993 because of a carpetbagger X FBI con man who embezzled $30,000 from me.
Since then the group False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF) has said "there are no tunnels." This false statement is repeated often by anyone researching the trial.
THIS REPORT NEEDS TO BE OUT THERE!
Hundreds of children are being called liars. This untruth is used DAILY to "prove" children are simply LIARS. It is used to set pedophiles free!
Sadistic (ritual) abuse DID happen at the McMartin Preschool!
If you are a parent or someone who cares about the safety of children, please contact me about getting this report published!
I don't want to make money on this. I just want the truth out there!!! Please copy this plea and distribute it widely.
Thank you for your help!
Interview with Jackie McGauley
CIA and Satanism -
The Franklin Scandal
Related - by William Ramsey
Liberals Liberate Child Killers - West Memphis Three
Hollywood and Mas media Covers Up West Memphis Three Satanist Killers
1974 Satanic Ritual Murder Still Unresolved
First Comment by S:
I realize this is anecdotal, but I grew up not far from Manhattan Beach, CA. When I was in high school (in the early- to mid-1980s), my best friend's dad was a child psychologist who was involved with treating some of the victims involved in the McMartin preschool case early on. Though he did not go into too much detail and he only spoke to me about it once, I very clearly remember that he told us that the case was much bigger than was being reported, and that judges, police, and even other psychologists were involved in the Satanic activity the kids reported. He lamented that the professionals working ostensibly on behalf of the kids in fact had their own agenda, and were doing further damage to them. I remember he was worried that, if he were to tell the truth, it could ruin him or worse, but that he couldn't live with himself if he aided in the cover up.
The McMartin case was one of my earliest encounters with the duplicitous nature of what is often presented as "news". Before the Internet, it was very difficult to obtain perspectives that differed from the dominant one presented by the media, and other than combing through stacks at some dusty university library, the general public had only "nonfiction" exposes such as Jeffery Victor's "Satanic Panic" to rely upon.